Active Users:1174 Time:22/11/2024 06:34:38 PM
Keep trying HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 06/03/2017 06:10:07 PM

It was for phone taps, not a computer.
"[In June], the FISA court reportedly turned down the Obama Justice Department’s request, which is notable: The FISA court is notoriously solicitous of government requests to conduct national-security surveillance (although, as I’ve noted over the years, the claim by many that it is a rubber-stamp is overblown). Not taking no for an answer, the Obama Justice Department evidently returned to the FISA court in October 2016, the critical final weeks of the presidential campaign. This time, the Justice Department submitted a narrowly tailored application that did not mention Trump. The court apparently granted it, authorizing surveillance of some Trump associates. It is unknown whether that surveillance is still underway, but the New York Times has identified – again, based on illegal leaks of classified information – at least three of its targets: Paul Manafort (the former Trump campaign chairman who was ousted in August), and two others whose connection to the Trump campaign was loose at best, Manafort’s former political-consulting business partner Roger Stone, and investor Carter Page."

Now this is all from "anonymous sources" but so is most everything that is being leveled at Trump so...

Reply to message
Trump wire tapping - 06/03/2017 02:36:15 AM 647 Views
It is an allegation, nothing more; even Trump has not offered ANY evidence - 06/03/2017 03:36:11 AM 780 Views
Ummm, try again - 06/03/2017 02:09:04 PM 616 Views
Even the lone unnamed source (i.e. The Guardians) does not corroborate Trumps claim - 06/03/2017 05:42:32 PM 765 Views
Keep trying - 06/03/2017 06:10:07 PM 486 Views
It is ONE anonymous source, who STILL never said, "phone tap," nor "Trump" - 06/03/2017 06:16:07 PM 645 Views
EVERYTHING for the last year has been anonymous sources... - 06/03/2017 09:49:27 PM 521 Views
anonymous sources are the new facts *NM* - 06/03/2017 09:59:06 PM 238 Views
It's just a baseless charge thrown out there to distract the press. - 06/03/2017 03:54:16 AM 533 Views
Yes and no - 06/03/2017 05:59:26 PM 622 Views
Philosophical question: if Trump isn't front page news, does he really exist? *NM* - 06/03/2017 06:18:19 AM 296 Views
That is when he is most real - 06/03/2017 06:03:11 PM 620 Views
Not far fetched. Obama did something similar to Merkel, did he not ? - 06/03/2017 08:34:40 AM 641 Views
It is not true until the NYT has an unnamed source *NM* - 06/03/2017 11:53:19 AM 289 Views
Actually, the whole thing is from one unnamed Guardian source (who did not say what Trump claims) - 06/03/2017 05:59:41 PM 649 Views
Source? *NM* - 06/03/2017 06:02:21 PM 224 Views
Sure; it is the one I linked in response to HyggaRott - 06/03/2017 06:08:29 PM 719 Views
So says the WP unamed source. And they call that fact checking - 06/03/2017 09:05:09 PM 540 Views
I watch too much "House of Cards".... - 06/03/2017 08:55:52 PM 569 Views

Reply to Message