Until you read the e-mails you have no clue whether it was classified information or not
Roland00 Send a noteboard - 31/10/2016 08:40:49 PM
Until you read the e-mails you have no clue whether it was classified information or not. Until you read the e-mails you have no clue if the e-mails are work related to Huma or not. For example they can be personal Huma e-mails but you can't investigate this information till you get a warrant to read Huma's e-mail.
The 650,000 number is not the number of Huma e-mails but the total amount of e-mails on this device.
So, uh, we're just not gonna talk about H. Clinton being back under FBI investigation, huh? *NM*
- 30/10/2016 02:37:33 AM
697 Views
Until Comey clarifies, there's nothing to talk about - just speculate.
- 30/10/2016 10:00:56 AM
546 Views
Do the math, Hillary is a known crook.....
- 31/10/2016 02:21:40 AM
605 Views
You are bringing your biases and projections into this
- 31/10/2016 02:17:21 PM
624 Views
Nice summary, and thanks for the defense. Though I'm sure he didn't mean it like that. 
*NM*
- 31/10/2016 06:52:45 PM
221 Views
*NM*
- 31/10/2016 06:52:45 PM
221 Views
I fher ex husband is carrying a laptop with claddified infomration it doesn't matter if they are new *NM*
- 31/10/2016 08:17:33 PM
350 Views
Until you read the e-mails you have no clue whether it was classified information or not
- 31/10/2016 08:40:49 PM
589 Views
If there are no classfied email on that laptop Comey needs to resign. *NM*
- 31/10/2016 08:51:06 PM
471 Views
But until we get a warrant (which did not occur until Sunday evening) how was Comey supposed to know
- 31/10/2016 09:12:18 PM
537 Views
Because they would not know they needed a warrant unless they saw emails making then think they did *NM*
- 01/11/2016 05:04:17 PM
292 Views
being an ex-House member, he *IS* allowed classified information if it's meant for him
- 31/10/2016 08:53:43 PM
539 Views
Being a CURRENT House memebr does not automatically give you a security clearance...
- 01/11/2016 11:28:50 AM
503 Views
neither does having "claddified infomration" automatically presume criminal activity
- 01/11/2016 04:43:24 PM
676 Views
This is where you are actually wrong....
- 01/11/2016 06:04:57 PM
484 Views
so you have read the contents of the emails in question? that is the larger point here
- 02/11/2016 08:05:53 PM
539 Views
No we're going to talk about the colossal nerve of the FBI to do anything that might hurt her *NM*
- 31/10/2016 10:13:44 AM
220 Views
Her top aide's husband using a laptop containing classfied documnets fro sexting with a minor?
- 31/10/2016 08:14:59 PM
469 Views
Or the allegations of rape leveled against Trump?
- 04/11/2016 01:06:10 AM
662 Views
But they have no problem doing so at the most convenient time for his electoral opponent?
- 04/11/2016 11:08:39 AM
566 Views
don't forget the bribery, ties to russia, white supremacy, illegal use of charity, etc etc
- 04/11/2016 06:06:55 PM
603 Views
Comey does new 2nd letter, new e-mails does not change its conclusion from months ago / july.
- 06/11/2016 08:52:58 PM
690 Views