Active Users:1189 Time:22/11/2024 07:45:53 PM
He probably meant the math comment as good fun Roland00 Send a noteboard - 31/10/2016 07:55:18 PM

Legolas, if he really wanted to go after you, he would not going after your math skills he would go after your spelling

There may be a little amount of projection here

Reply to message
So, uh, we're just not gonna talk about H. Clinton being back under FBI investigation, huh? *NM* - 30/10/2016 02:37:33 AM 697 Views
Until Comey clarifies, there's nothing to talk about - just speculate. - 30/10/2016 10:00:56 AM 546 Views
Nods *NM* - 30/10/2016 04:46:35 PM 243 Views
Do the math, Hillary is a known crook..... - 31/10/2016 02:21:40 AM 605 Views
You are bringing your biases and projections into this - 31/10/2016 02:17:21 PM 624 Views
Nice summary, and thanks for the defense. Though I'm sure he didn't mean it like that. *NM* - 31/10/2016 06:52:45 PM 221 Views
He probably meant the math comment as good fun - 31/10/2016 07:55:18 PM 678 Views
I fher ex husband is carrying a laptop with claddified infomration it doesn't matter if they are new *NM* - 31/10/2016 08:17:33 PM 350 Views
being an ex-House member, he *IS* allowed classified information if it's meant for him - 31/10/2016 08:53:43 PM 539 Views
Being a CURRENT House memebr does not automatically give you a security clearance... - 01/11/2016 11:28:50 AM 503 Views
neither does having "claddified infomration" automatically presume criminal activity - 01/11/2016 04:43:24 PM 676 Views
This is where you are actually wrong.... - 01/11/2016 06:04:57 PM 484 Views
More interesting then anything.... - 01/11/2016 06:08:19 PM 507 Views
so you have read the contents of the emails in question? that is the larger point here - 02/11/2016 08:05:53 PM 539 Views
In theory, I agree with you... - 03/11/2016 03:48:58 PM 529 Views
Re: In theory, I agree with you... - 04/11/2016 06:01:55 PM 526 Views
I do love how, for the Dems, he went from... - 31/10/2016 02:17:42 PM 527 Views
Ewww. *NM* - 04/11/2016 04:06:37 PM 206 Views
she's not under any investigation whatsoever - 31/10/2016 06:00:14 PM 502 Views

Reply to Message