Active Users:1126 Time:22/11/2024 07:59:58 PM
Until Comey clarifies, there's nothing to talk about - just speculate. Legolas Send a noteboard - 30/10/2016 10:00:56 AM

There may be something serious or there may not. At the moment I'm giving the benefit of the doubt both to Comey - in the sense that he may have had legitimate reasons for timing his letter as he did - and to Clinton in the sense that if there's nothing more serious than with the earlier batches of emails, then there's no reason why this should change anyone's opinion of her.

Reply to message
So, uh, we're just not gonna talk about H. Clinton being back under FBI investigation, huh? *NM* - 30/10/2016 02:37:33 AM 697 Views
Until Comey clarifies, there's nothing to talk about - just speculate. - 30/10/2016 10:00:56 AM 547 Views
Nods *NM* - 30/10/2016 04:46:35 PM 243 Views
Do the math, Hillary is a known crook..... - 31/10/2016 02:21:40 AM 605 Views
You are bringing your biases and projections into this - 31/10/2016 02:17:21 PM 624 Views
I fher ex husband is carrying a laptop with claddified infomration it doesn't matter if they are new *NM* - 31/10/2016 08:17:33 PM 350 Views
being an ex-House member, he *IS* allowed classified information if it's meant for him - 31/10/2016 08:53:43 PM 540 Views
Being a CURRENT House memebr does not automatically give you a security clearance... - 01/11/2016 11:28:50 AM 503 Views
neither does having "claddified infomration" automatically presume criminal activity - 01/11/2016 04:43:24 PM 676 Views
This is where you are actually wrong.... - 01/11/2016 06:04:57 PM 485 Views
More interesting then anything.... - 01/11/2016 06:08:19 PM 507 Views
so you have read the contents of the emails in question? that is the larger point here - 02/11/2016 08:05:53 PM 539 Views
In theory, I agree with you... - 03/11/2016 03:48:58 PM 529 Views
Re: In theory, I agree with you... - 04/11/2016 06:01:55 PM 526 Views
I do love how, for the Dems, he went from... - 31/10/2016 02:17:42 PM 527 Views
Ewww. *NM* - 04/11/2016 04:06:37 PM 206 Views
she's not under any investigation whatsoever - 31/10/2016 06:00:14 PM 502 Views

Reply to Message