The American revolution did virtually all of that first and without the Reign of Terror. *NM*
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 25/07/2016 06:40:09 PM
View original post
View original postWhat the fuck was good about that disgusting orgy of murder and degeneracy? What good came out of it, except in the eyes of those arbitrarily prejudiced against monarchy, and of course, the eternal anti-Catholicism of every good leftist pseudo-intellectual...
View original postConsidering that both Tom and yourself take such a view of it, I'm going to assume that you're genuinely not aware of how very differently Europeans view the French Revolution, and not merely being flippant. Also, 'arbitrarily prejudiced against monarchy' is pretty hilarious from the mouth of an American patriot.
View original postWhat good came out of it? Oh, I don't know, democracy, the notion of universal human rights, a solid corpus of laws which in many cases remain in existence to this day, the beginning of the end of global slavery, and I could go on for a while. Certainly, all those things probably could have happened in a more gradual way without the Reign of Terror, the slaughter in the Vendee and the Napoleonic wars, but if you're going to focus on the longer-term consequences, I see more good ones than bad.
View original postAnd I think you'll find that aside from the British - or even there, among those who can look beyond the shallow obsession with Wellington and Waterloo that I mentioned - many West-Europeans have a fairly positive view of Napoleon. Aside from the astonishing military prowess, his rule cemented the democratization of the French Revolution and wrote law books in many places that didn't really have much of a rule of law before. On many subjects, plenty of European countries still have almost identical laws because Napoleon's laws were good enough that nobody bothered to change them since.
View original post
View original postAs far as Tom's claim, there is the destabilization of the order in Europe, and the rise of Napoleon, and his subsequent actions. The excesses of both the Revolution and the dictator so horrified the sane world that republicanism and constitutionalism were given a dirty name in Europe, which couldn't help but delay needed reforms and impede legitimate movements for increased freedom. The French Revolution inspired most subsequent revolutionary movements, and most reactionary excesses of the 19th century could be attributed to reflexive & legitimate fears of another Reign of Terror. The Parisian communists of 1871, and Lenin both drew inspiration from the Revolution (Lenin even asked "Where are we going to find our own Fouquier-Tinville?" - a needless concern as it turned out).
View original postBy 'sane world' I take it you mean the monarchs of Europe, and by 'destabilization of order in Europe' you mean that those pesky peasants got uppity and started clamouring for their rights? Of course things got out of hand, but your argument, in essence, seems to boil down to 'the French and European people should have just sit back and waited until their rulers were ready to give them their rights and constitutions gradually'. Which, once again, is pretty hilarious coming from an American patriot. Napoleon crowned himself emperor, yes, but singling him out for being a dictator seems rather silly considering that all of his foreign opponents and allies were hereditary monarchs as well, and that Napoleon did establish the rule of law and protection of citizens' rights before any of his opponents except Britain had any intention of doing the same.
View original post
View original postThe Revolution also helped sell Europe on the notions of universal conscription and total war, and Napoleon's innovations in organization reshaped military thinking over the next century, leading to the general staff methods that helped propel the reluctant monarchs into World War One.
View original postFair enough, but if you're so insistent that all the good would've happened anyway and with less bloodshed, I don't know why you're so sure that such military innovations and total war would not have happened without the Revolution.
View original post
View original postBut even if it had no legacy, it was a period of national evil which exceeded the Holocaust in depravity and scope, lacking only the technical accomplishments of Shoah (though arguably, the latter could not have happened without the French pioneering the modern atrocity state & dictatorship). Even had a true constitutional republic come about instead of Napoleon, it would not have justified what was done by the Revolutionaries. For someone who affects such moral indignation over the Nationalists' actions during the Spanish Civil War, these questions are rather disingenuous. If nothing else, the most recent Spanish episodes of national pride were in Napoleon's invasion, and their people's resistance. The members of Nationalist coalition were unquestionably aware of the resemblance of the two so-called Republics, and the Spanish Republicans didn't help their cause by committing so many of the same atrocities and clerical persecutions.
View original postI assume you're familiar with the Constitution of Cadiz. In Spain like elsewhere, it took the upheaval of the French Revolution and Napoleon's invasion before the citizens could take a stand against their absolute monarchs and write a constitution. Which was then promptly squashed again by the reactionaries after Napoleon was defeated. Certainly the French Revolution involved a lot of violence, but it inspired democratization all over Europe - and the rest of the world. Being itself inspired by the American revolution, of course.
View original post'Period of national evil' is ridiculous except for the actual Reign of Terror, which, as nasty as it was, lasted for less than a year. I'm not even going to comment on the Holocaust comparison.
We need stricter truck control laws!
15/07/2016 04:31:07 PM
- 923 Views
secretly everyone here loves moondog *NM*
15/07/2016 11:09:32 PM
- 326 Views
No no no!
18/07/2016 10:07:46 PM
- 640 Views
BEST. BASTILLE DAY. EVER!
18/07/2016 11:12:22 PM
- 652 Views
The French Revolution was one of the greatest catastrophes in history
21/07/2016 03:22:28 PM
- 522 Views
You know, I've been reading this book on Talleyrand...
22/07/2016 12:03:34 AM
- 530 Views
Re: You know, I've been reading this book on Talleyrand...
23/07/2016 03:54:25 AM
- 662 Views
I found Thomas Carlyle's book on the French Revolution quite interesting
23/07/2016 04:53:29 AM
- 611 Views
Yeah, that's definitely on the list of books on the subject to read. *NM*
23/07/2016 09:43:12 AM
- 274 Views
Wow. You really do live in an alternate universe - but in this case maybe one many Americans share.
23/07/2016 10:40:27 AM
- 587 Views
As someone who just took a final on matrimonial regimes, the Code Civil is NOT a net good. *NM*
24/07/2016 03:24:35 AM
- 287 Views
I'd be interested to hear more about that. What are the bad sides? *NM*
24/07/2016 06:35:06 PM
- 259 Views
I'm not defending a depraved mob and conquest-hungry military dictatorship
25/07/2016 02:58:13 PM
- 628 Views
And I'm not comparing the French and American Revolutions, as such. Just noting that...
25/07/2016 06:57:17 PM
- 625 Views
The American revolution did virtually all of that first and without the Reign of Terror. *NM*
25/07/2016 06:40:09 PM
- 437 Views
Yes, because the Americans rebelled against someone four thousand miles away.
25/07/2016 07:00:20 PM
- 499 Views
Distance was an issue but who lead them was a major factor as well
26/07/2016 05:41:13 PM
- 549 Views
Was the UK civil wars of the 17th century really that great in comparison to the French chaos of the
23/07/2016 11:24:21 AM
- 537 Views