Then actually have quite a bit of common ground. 
LiterateDog Send a noteboard - 01/10/2015 05:49:05 PM
LiterateDog Send a noteboard - 01/10/2015 05:49:05 PM
View original post
I think the death penalty is much too arbitrary and except in cases like shooting police officers not an effective deterrent. I am certain it would be fairly easier to find multiple cases of murder committed in OK during that time that are more deserving of the death penalty and with stronger evidence. I was just objecting to the way moon presented his argument. The case against him much stronger than moonie wants to give admit. He was caught stealing from his boss and the next day his boss ends up dead and his friend did and claimed he paid him to do it. For good or bad we send people to prison for life on this sort of evidence all the time.
I think the death penalty is much too arbitrary and except in cases like shooting police officers not an effective deterrent. I am certain it would be fairly easier to find multiple cases of murder committed in OK during that time that are more deserving of the death penalty and with stronger evidence. I was just objecting to the way moon presented his argument. The case against him much stronger than moonie wants to give admit. He was caught stealing from his boss and the next day his boss ends up dead and his friend did and claimed he paid him to do it. For good or bad we send people to prison for life on this sort of evidence all the time.
Moondog likes to misrepresent things, it's true. I'm not sure he's misrepresenting it overly much in this case. But, it is what it is. I think this man should never have been convicted. Juries place way too much trust in eye-witness testimony. Add in the fact that the "witness" had every reason to lie and you should have plenty of reasonable doubt.
Moondog is an odd fellow. As are many leftists. They're happy to use the State to destroy people's lives when they don't agree with those people, or need those people's assets, but are squeamish when the police and/or prosecutors do it to (possible) criminals. Every regulation and tax his ilk support could, and sometimes do, lead to people in jail or dead. But they have no problem with that.
"I'll blow whomever I want, whenever I want, as long as I can still breathe and kneel."
-Samantha Jones, SatC
-Samantha Jones, SatC
will an innocent man be executed tomorrow?
- 29/09/2015 10:52:46 PM
1591 Views
It is a travesty that should disgust every decent person who hears about it. *NM*
- 30/09/2015 01:20:20 AM
316 Views
*NM*
For those of you no paying attention moondog is full of shit
- 30/09/2015 08:55:43 PM
620 Views
Would you like to die on the word of one snitch who lowered his own sentence by implicating another?
- 30/09/2015 09:28:03 PM
569 Views
I actually don't support the death penalty in this or most cases
- 01/10/2015 02:01:04 PM
645 Views
Then actually have quite a bit of common ground.
- 01/10/2015 05:49:05 PM
588 Views
- 01/10/2015 05:49:05 PM
588 Views
I'm not following the logical progression from "taxes" to "death." *NM*
- 02/10/2015 09:11:16 PM
313 Views
No? Hold a seance with Eric Garner's spirit. It might be able to clue you in.
- 04/10/2015 04:33:40 AM
585 Views
If there is reasonsable doubt, and there is,
- 01/10/2015 01:45:12 PM
588 Views
he was not convicted on physical evidence so why would expect it to link him?
- 01/10/2015 05:39:40 PM
571 Views
Bask in my new-found Golden Glory!
- 01/10/2015 05:39:48 PM
572 Views