Active Users:617 Time:18/12/2024 03:24:04 PM
Would you like to die on the word of one snitch who lowered his own sentence by implicating another? LiterateDog Send a noteboard - 30/09/2015 09:28:03 PM

I know you can be a bit of an apologist for the police and the State, but c'mon, you really think this guy should be killed by the State on so little evidence? This case STINKS.I don't care what a jury found. They find lots of bullshit all the time. Juries are neither holy nor infallible.They didn't see all the evidence, and because of procedure, never will. All current, known evidence says this man is plausibly innocent, and yet he is going to DIE. You can't even send someone down for a short jail term unless there is no reasonable doubt per a jury, but you'd have the State in essence murder this fellow on a "probably/maybe" just to be "tough on crime". We KNOW there are a lot of people how have been murdered by the state. Not executed, but murdered, because we KNOW now that they were indeed innocent. Killing an innocent is murder, no matter under whose agency it happens. Do you want to add another person to this list? I guess, if this case is anything to go by, it has become "better to let 10 innocent men die than let one guilty man go free". Aren't you so proud?

"I'll blow whomever I want, whenever I want, as long as I can still breathe and kneel."
-Samantha Jones, SatC
This message last edited by LiterateDog on 30/09/2015 at 09:35:26 PM
Reply to message
will an innocent man be executed tomorrow? - 29/09/2015 10:52:46 PM 1553 Views
sounds nuts *NM* - 30/09/2015 08:11:26 AM 300 Views
For those of you no paying attention moondog is full of shit - 30/09/2015 08:55:43 PM 589 Views
Would you like to die on the word of one snitch who lowered his own sentence by implicating another? - 30/09/2015 09:28:03 PM 540 Views
I actually don't support the death penalty in this or most cases - 01/10/2015 02:01:04 PM 614 Views
Then actually have quite a bit of common ground. - 01/10/2015 05:49:05 PM 558 Views
If there is reasonsable doubt, and there is, - 01/10/2015 01:45:12 PM 551 Views
he was not convicted on physical evidence so why would expect it to link him? - 01/10/2015 05:39:40 PM 536 Views
On basically eye-witness testimony alone? - 01/10/2015 05:44:23 PM 544 Views
Bask in my new-found Golden Glory! - 01/10/2015 05:39:48 PM 545 Views
More! - 01/10/2015 05:40:41 PM 564 Views
Re: More! - 05/10/2015 02:51:47 PM 480 Views
Fail! - 05/10/2015 06:13:45 PM 502 Views
Re: Fail! - 05/10/2015 06:14:19 PM 531 Views
Um - 05/10/2015 06:35:09 PM 540 Views
Of course I did! - 05/10/2015 07:45:25 PM 544 Views
Teeheehee - 05/10/2015 07:58:58 PM 503 Views
Just checking this still works... - 06/11/2015 03:01:53 PM 941 Views
It appears to. - 06/11/2015 04:59:29 PM 478 Views
Posting for the sake of posting. - 06/11/2015 04:59:11 PM 499 Views

Reply to Message