Active Users:1222 Time:22/11/2024 03:46:12 PM
Just because it might destroy the world doesn't make it WW III. Legolas Send a noteboard - 30/06/2015 08:15:01 PM

It would still just be a regional war, with Putin resembling Ahmadinejad or Kim Jong-Un much more than Krushchev; nuclear bombs alone do not a great power make.

You're the first to say in every argument - rightly - that Russia isn't the Soviet Union. It's much weaker on its own, and perhaps more importantly has merely a fraction of its global support. Its economy would crumble within months in the case of a war; it's really just Brazil with nukes and a megalomaniac dictator. Or, to use your favourite bogeyman, kind of like what you'd get if somehow Erdogan built an empire joining Turkey with Iraq and a nuclear Iran.

Anyway, besides that I do see your point - much like Brazil, it does need to be taken seriously and not needlessly antagonized in its aspirations of having at least a small zone of influence. And whether we like it or not, the nukes do make that rather more important than it is for Brazil.

I'm thinking it would be a pretty good move for the EU to add Russian to its list of official languages right about now, and to take various other steps to reduce the tension and undermine Russian propaganda. I'm not sure if Eastern Ukraine is salvageable anymore, but at least the Russian speakers in the Baltics are.

Reply to message
Excellent article on the threat of a nuclear war. - 30/06/2015 05:42:09 PM 865 Views
But Tom, Russia is BAD! - 30/06/2015 06:49:29 PM 415 Views
We didn't hang Hussein, his people did - 30/06/2015 07:48:15 PM 438 Views
So, might makes right? - 01/07/2015 12:56:24 PM 446 Views
Like elections wars matter even cold ones - 03/07/2015 12:08:09 AM 385 Views
Just because it might destroy the world doesn't make it WW III. - 30/06/2015 08:15:01 PM 434 Views
Should it be allowed to make that zone of influence none voluntary? - 03/07/2015 12:15:15 AM 397 Views

Reply to Message