My placeholder has been updated with my response to your post.
Can liberals all stop their posturing about adhering to science?
05/06/2015 12:04:13 AM
- 1215 Views
It's not really a difficult concept to understand, man
05/06/2015 02:23:34 PM
- 650 Views
Some people feel like they are women, though born as men. So they take steps to live
05/06/2015 04:47:14 PM
- 637 Views
The issue is science, and you respond with ...feelings? The point called, and it misses you too.
05/06/2015 09:31:09 PM
- 663 Views
Are you seriously claiming your post is motivated by science?
05/06/2015 10:39:01 PM
- 520 Views
No, by hypocrites citing science as a trump card when it suits them & ignoring it on other issues
06/06/2015 12:33:53 AM
- 639 Views
If you want to accuse liberals of ignoring science there so many better examples
09/06/2015 04:35:58 PM
- 641 Views
gender issues aside the evidence of evolution is undeniable to the extreme
05/06/2015 08:37:37 PM
- 521 Views
Well then why do scientists feel the need to make up their own fake evidence?
05/06/2015 09:16:40 PM
- 567 Views
The specifics and our understanding always changes
05/06/2015 09:50:39 PM
- 572 Views
"A better fit" doesn't sound much like testable hypotheses and observable data
06/06/2015 12:38:49 AM
- 707 Views
Science and absolute, unquestioned fact...
06/06/2015 11:16:10 AM
- 581 Views
The theory is refined that is all
08/06/2015 07:11:40 PM
- 557 Views
Refined is probably a better word for it (though some can be overturned)
09/06/2015 08:47:22 AM
- 548 Views
We can find Naederthal DNA in modern humans
08/06/2015 07:01:01 PM
- 513 Views
We share 1/3 of the DNA of flowers. Where are those in our ancestral tree?
09/06/2015 02:20:46 PM
- 544 Views
Americas (Christian?!) "accepted religious standards" can and have been changed to vindicate robbers
15/06/2015 03:37:12 AM
- 526 Views
So? My point is that liberals would not allow you to teach that in a public school
15/06/2015 01:43:43 PM
- 457 Views
Liberals consistently teach that in schools, despite conservatives calling it “revisionist history”
17/06/2015 10:00:48 AM
- 573 Views
The problem with the "there can not spontanous life" argument is
15/06/2015 02:29:06 PM
- 502 Views
"when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth"
17/06/2015 10:02:00 AM
- 528 Views
will since omnipotent beings are ut side the realm of the possible we can eliminate that
17/06/2015 05:45:36 PM
- 583 Views
Who says omnipotent beings are outside the realm of possibility?
20/06/2015 03:59:44 AM
- 644 Views
You can always find unaswered question in science but that gives no weight to religion
22/06/2015 01:52:25 PM
- 504 Views
...I'm confused, are you claiming that no real fossils have been found?
07/06/2015 02:41:12 PM
- 541 Views
And they prove what, exactly?
07/06/2015 11:24:43 PM
- 643 Views
Er, well yeah, that's the point- Scientific knowledge keeps growing and challenging itself
08/06/2015 02:58:26 PM
- 587 Views
It's not at all the same.
09/06/2015 02:53:06 PM
- 548 Views
Dude, you're monologuing like a supervillain and going off on insane tangents.
09/06/2015 03:27:37 PM
- 646 Views
In fact, fossils are not even necessary sometimes -- we can see it over the course of generations
08/06/2015 09:06:23 PM
- 564 Views
That's not evolution, idiot.
09/06/2015 02:31:27 PM
- 554 Views
um, that's actually EXACTLY how natural selection works, thanks for arguing my point so nicely
10/06/2015 12:19:32 AM
- 530 Views
They're not changing. Same species, same characteristics. We're just finding different proportions.
13/06/2015 05:35:09 PM
- 465 Views
"It's not like they are going to run into difficulties later in life"? Seriously?
15/06/2015 03:36:42 AM
- 470 Views
Re: "It's not like they are going to run into difficulties later in life"? Seriously?
15/06/2015 02:23:36 PM
- 507 Views
I would not have expected to see you adhere to a scientist position
07/06/2015 03:06:11 AM
- 597 Views
I am not; I am criticizing the people who apply it inconsistently
07/06/2015 11:14:05 PM
- 638 Views
You are confusing science and scientism
08/06/2015 10:15:57 PM
- 520 Views
For what it is worth, I have encountered many people who satisfy those stated "scientism" criteria
15/06/2015 03:37:36 AM
- 484 Views
can republicans stop their posturing about adhering to morality?
08/06/2015 09:17:16 PM
- 558 Views
My own homosexual inclinations would not constitute hypocrisy in opposing deviant behavior
09/06/2015 02:14:56 PM
- 582 Views
at least you're finally open about your homosexual attraction to the former Bruce Jenner...
10/06/2015 12:05:10 AM
- 639 Views
"… in the latter times some shall depart from the faith… speaking lies in hypocrisy…"
15/06/2015 03:36:08 AM
- 598 Views
Good luck with that; (at least) two beloved long time RAFOlk are post-medically transgendered
15/06/2015 03:34:33 AM
- 430 Views
I find this entire discussion absolutely hilarious.
15/06/2015 04:19:31 PM
- 469 Views
well I am sucb a died in the wool liberal I just cant help myself
15/06/2015 06:25:57 PM
- 432 Views
...what? Attacking points is pretty much what debate IS.
16/06/2015 04:29:05 AM
- 495 Views
No...
17/06/2015 08:00:57 PM
- 477 Views
OK?
18/06/2015 04:03:32 AM
- 512 Views
Oh, I'm sorry.
18/06/2015 09:05:42 PM
- 577 Views
A thesis delayed till the SECOND paragraph is, at best, misplaced
20/06/2015 09:37:36 AM
- 554 Views
Bah, damn you for good points!
21/06/2015 09:33:49 PM
- 570 Views
Oh, man, been there, done that, got the T-shirt
22/06/2015 01:26:13 AM
- 494 Views
Heheh, thank you for understanding.
22/06/2015 09:23:11 PM
- 484 Views
The really fun part is when grammatical gender doesn't match the sex even for humans.
22/06/2015 10:30:33 PM
- 449 Views
"Mädchen" was my initial reference, changed because I think Spanish more accessible to Americans
24/06/2015 04:42:37 AM
- 510 Views
Re: Oh, I'm sorry.
20/06/2015 04:44:24 PM
- 630 Views
You're missing my whole issue with labeling.
21/06/2015 09:32:36 PM
- 563 Views
Had this post been the thread-starter it would have drawn far fewer complaints
24/06/2015 04:41:06 AM
- 813 Views
The sheer brazenness of the "calling bigots 'bigots' is offensive" "defense" continually amazes me
20/06/2015 04:03:46 AM
- 763 Views
This might be a complete non-sequitur, but...
21/06/2015 10:38:19 PM
- 450 Views