You summed it up well. I now feel no need to respond to his idiocy. Thank you. *NM*
everynametaken Send a noteboard - 20/11/2014 03:06:39 AM
View original post
I don't know enough about the situation in Ferguson to espouse a position on it (although that doesn't appear to have stopped you), but trying every single person who is so much as suspected of murder would grind our legal system to a halt. It would also, in federal cases, be a clear violation of the Fifth Amendment. The case in question is, I believe, a state case, but Missouri also uses a grand jury system. Whether that's a provision of the state constitution, as it is in my state, I don't know. In any event, casually dismissing one of the pillars of criminal law in the US is idiotic.
I don't know enough about the situation in Ferguson to espouse a position on it (although that doesn't appear to have stopped you), but trying every single person who is so much as suspected of murder would grind our legal system to a halt. It would also, in federal cases, be a clear violation of the Fifth Amendment. The case in question is, I believe, a state case, but Missouri also uses a grand jury system. Whether that's a provision of the state constitution, as it is in my state, I don't know. In any event, casually dismissing one of the pillars of criminal law in the US is idiotic.
And the idea of putting on a jury trial for every single police officer who shoots a person is so incomprehensibly stupid that I am having trouble believing you actually stopped to think about that sentence for more than half a second.
This was just an embarrassing post to read, in all.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
these things should be simple: shoot someone dead -> face a jury trial to determine your guilt
18/11/2014 11:38:11 PM
- 1050 Views
That's a viewpoint completely divorced from reality.
19/11/2014 07:03:07 AM
- 586 Views
You summed it up well. I now feel no need to respond to his idiocy. Thank you. *NM*
20/11/2014 03:06:39 AM
- 349 Views
Do you ever really feel the need? Or is it just satisfying sometimes? *NM*
20/11/2014 03:48:34 AM
- 262 Views
When it's in print, you need to set the record straight. But yeah, what you said too.
20/11/2014 11:05:40 AM
- 629 Views
It's particularly annoying because I think there's an important discussion to be had
21/11/2014 01:19:35 AM
- 548 Views
Exactly. I said the same thing the first time he posted a hysterical jeremiad on this topic.
21/11/2014 01:34:23 AM
- 579 Views
It's comforting to know that after a decade of being a member of this community, I still double post *NM*
21/11/2014 01:19:35 AM
- 290 Views
let me amend it, then: MURDER someone -> face a jury trial
25/11/2014 10:55:34 PM
- 559 Views
At some point you will have to tell me what being on the grand jury was like.
26/11/2014 06:46:06 AM
- 543 Views
The evdience presented to the grand jury has been released and complety vindicates Wilosn
26/11/2014 02:50:03 PM
- 547 Views
Who indicted Brown for jaywalking & petty theft, or asked for the death penalty for those crimes?
19/11/2014 10:42:53 PM
- 709 Views
He is facing a jury
22/11/2014 06:01:28 AM
- 619 Views
facing a jury implies cross examination. a grand jury is at the mercy of the DA running it
25/11/2014 09:58:46 PM
- 582 Views
Re: facing a jury implies cross examination. a grand jury is at the mercy of the DA running it
26/11/2014 05:59:41 AM
- 644 Views
nice to see you are still not allowing facts to cloud your judgment
29/11/2014 12:30:42 PM
- 622 Views