thank you for having the reasonable approach to this
moondog Send a noteboard - 03/06/2014 07:56:49 PM
View original post
We sent him over there and I think we should have done what is reasonable to bring him back. Even he had been been captured on patrol I don't think we should have released five high value tragets and I think it shows a seriuos question in Obama's judgment, not that I really think he has any. If we had released some number of of low level prisoners as part of an actaul prisoner exchange that might be one thing but we released terrorist leaders.
We sent him over there and I think we should have done what is reasonable to bring him back. Even he had been been captured on patrol I don't think we should have released five high value tragets and I think it shows a seriuos question in Obama's judgment, not that I really think he has any. If we had released some number of of low level prisoners as part of an actaul prisoner exchange that might be one thing but we released terrorist leaders.
There does not to be an investigation into how he was captured and if he willing walked into the hands of the enemy he should be tried and locked away for life because we lost soldiers trying to recover him.
i completely agree that, if he truly deserted he should face his accusations in a tribunal/courtmartial. he still should have been brought back though, because that is the kind of thing the US used to stand for, and it's a shame that some people can't see past the partisan divide long enough to actually serve their country.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Obama negotiates with terrorists, gains the release of a US deserter and possible traitor.
- 03/06/2014 04:44:35 AM
1460 Views
I don't think it is that cut and dry
- 03/06/2014 01:00:16 PM
783 Views
Bull. Shit.
- 03/06/2014 04:46:08 PM
906 Views
he has right to a trial
- 03/06/2014 06:27:39 PM
742 Views
Well of course he does. I can't act as his judge, jury and executioner, either.
- 03/06/2014 06:45:58 PM
896 Views
I think he is guilty as hell
- 03/06/2014 11:24:02 PM
825 Views
I don't think he should have rot there, either.
- 04/06/2014 04:05:18 AM
729 Views
glad to see you put your politics above your country, tom
- 04/06/2014 07:32:55 PM
782 Views
You're full of shit, as usual.
- 04/06/2014 07:45:43 PM
708 Views
and you are more brainwashed, as usual
- 04/06/2014 07:56:29 PM
751 Views
You really are stupid, aren't you?
- 05/06/2014 05:26:38 PM
681 Views
once again, you don't know the details other than the prisoner exchange
- 05/06/2014 08:37:59 PM
761 Views
You expect someone to think rationally when it comes to Obama support? *NM*
- 07/06/2014 05:58:24 AM
486 Views
thank you for having the reasonable approach to this
- 03/06/2014 07:56:49 PM
761 Views
Obama is a weak fool
- 03/06/2014 04:04:58 PM
710 Views
They should impeach the fucking douchebag.
- 03/06/2014 04:48:28 PM
715 Views
I'm picturing you ranting to a half-empty bar as you wave a glass around, and it's amusing
- 05/06/2014 03:52:15 PM
740 Views
"Terrorists" doesn't seem accurate. Enemy combatants, okay, but even that was limited.
- 03/06/2014 05:56:15 PM
780 Views
Wasiq was involved with relations with al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups. He is a terrorist.
- 03/06/2014 06:09:22 PM
704 Views
That seems to be stretching the definition of the word.
- 03/06/2014 06:38:35 PM
852 Views
He was a Taliban commander, too, not just a guy who knew al-Qaeda members.
- 03/06/2014 06:50:37 PM
775 Views
the outrage comes from "Obama Derangement Syndrome", which is yet to make it into the DSM alas...
- 03/06/2014 07:48:09 PM
679 Views
Serious question....as Tom mentioned.....should Obama be impeached for this?
- 03/06/2014 06:55:24 PM
681 Views
stupid answer: yes, impeach Obama at your earliest convenience *NM*
- 03/06/2014 08:48:28 PM
489 Views
Funny that the military top brass agrees with it, then.
- 03/06/2014 08:51:48 PM
764 Views
Sec. Gates was against it when he was Sec. of Defense, Panetta said hell no. *NM*
- 04/06/2014 04:07:49 AM
377 Views
Yup, most top military leadership was against this reckless move. *NM*
- 04/06/2014 04:26:16 AM
383 Views
lots of republicans were for Bergdahl's release before they were against it
- 04/06/2014 07:42:45 PM
776 Views
you missed the one where they suggest trading high level captives for his return
- 04/06/2014 09:37:22 PM
713 Views
Oh wait, that's because it doesn't exist... *NM*
- 05/06/2014 06:18:11 AM
388 Views
so you must know all the details since you're secretly a top-level government official?
- 05/06/2014 08:41:14 PM
732 Views
Okay, but then is not now.
- 04/06/2014 05:43:25 PM
727 Views
The statements are that Panetta and Gates said to never release some of them.
- 04/06/2014 07:05:24 PM
744 Views
You do realize that there has been a quiet culling of our military's top brass over the last couple
- 07/06/2014 05:54:59 AM
863 Views
It's gross. Gates would never have agreed to the release of those 5.
- 07/06/2014 05:11:58 PM
656 Views
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
- 04/06/2014 09:29:15 PM
703 Views
Absolutely not.
- 05/06/2014 06:21:59 AM
682 Views
Re: Absolutely not.
- 05/06/2014 08:43:55 PM
706 Views
Do you have a guarantee to go with those twizzlers?
- 07/06/2014 03:57:17 AM
667 Views
Don't bother trying to debate him. He actually believes everything Obama says is the truth.
- 07/06/2014 05:13:47 PM
681 Views
You seem to have missed the concept of "Justified" in there
- 07/06/2014 11:36:25 PM
907 Views
no, i'm pretty sure i got it right
- 09/06/2014 09:37:49 PM
708 Views
Re: no, i'm pretty sure i got it right
- 10/06/2014 03:43:49 AM
803 Views
a few facts you are neglecting
- 11/06/2014 07:08:16 PM
613 Views
Do you even read my posts or are you just arguing with some imaginary conservative caricature?
- 11/06/2014 11:01:36 PM
826 Views