Active Users:888 Time:22/11/2024 02:04:33 AM
The essence of the question was "Would you think it worth the bother to seek an injunction?" Tim Send a noteboard - 19/11/2013 07:01:30 PM

(Or an interdict, as it's called in Scotland.)

Would you go to court if necessary, or just let it slide?


View original postIf, however, there is a legally binding requirement that the owner get permission from all apartment owners to make the change for the door, why don't you just refuse to give the permission on the grounds that you are concerned about your child's safety and be done with it? If she doesn't stop after that, seek an injunction on those grounds.

I expect she is going to go ahead and do it anyway, unless she is interdicted. No-one has been approached for permission.


The apartment (or "flat" as you call it, despite the fact that it appears to have three dimensions)

I thought you were a fan of British English? We don't use "apartment".

Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt.

—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.

—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
Reply to message
What would you do? - 15/11/2013 07:33:08 PM 2201 Views
Hrm. - 15/11/2013 08:30:22 PM 888 Views
Re: Hrm. - 16/11/2013 09:57:02 AM 907 Views
Don't they need to apply for planning permission to do that? - 15/11/2013 10:10:35 PM 956 Views
For the door, yes. For the holiday let, I don't think so. - 16/11/2013 09:58:30 AM 907 Views
Hm. Tricky, that. - 15/11/2013 10:38:57 PM 981 Views
Re: Hm. Tricky, that. - 16/11/2013 09:59:57 AM 969 Views
If there is anything you can do to fight it, do so - 16/11/2013 01:25:28 AM 996 Views
Yes. - 16/11/2013 10:03:03 AM 944 Views
The most reasonable thing would be to cut a bitch. - 16/11/2013 02:47:42 AM 1007 Views
this sounds fully reasonable, yeah. - 16/11/2013 03:22:46 AM 1012 Views
Quite. - 16/11/2013 10:06:43 AM 859 Views
Cutting a bitch is always an answer. *NM* - 20/11/2013 02:20:06 PM 633 Views
Tough. - 16/11/2013 10:15:21 AM 924 Views
Re: Tough. - 16/11/2013 07:41:49 PM 865 Views
Perhaps I don't grasp the gravity of the situation. - 16/11/2013 03:52:15 PM 926 Views
It's more irritating that grave, but I do worry about security to an extent. - 16/11/2013 07:47:02 PM 836 Views
Re: I hear you. - 17/11/2013 03:50:44 PM 994 Views
Re: I hear you. - 18/11/2013 05:03:15 PM 908 Views
do you let your child play unsupervised now? - 16/11/2013 06:46:08 PM 841 Views
Not precisely. - 16/11/2013 08:01:54 PM 789 Views
Uh...isn't the nature of ownership that you can do what you want to with your property? - 16/11/2013 10:27:05 PM 787 Views
Not always, according to what title deeds and zoning restrictions say. *NM* - 16/11/2013 10:32:20 PM 402 Views
Well, then you do some research before you start a shit storm with your neighbors. *NM* - 18/11/2013 03:42:43 PM 416 Views
Which obviously we have done, Tim being who he is and all. *NM* - 18/11/2013 04:49:45 PM 429 Views
Well, so what is the neighbor doing wrong? *NM* - 18/11/2013 05:50:25 PM 437 Views
It depends on interpretation, from what I understand. - 18/11/2013 07:17:03 PM 859 Views
Well, I'm not licensed in Scotland - 19/11/2013 03:04:02 PM 807 Views
How is a short-term holiday rental not a business? - 19/11/2013 06:01:50 PM 936 Views
For zoning purposes it's being used as a residence. Don't be daft. - 20/11/2013 02:24:54 PM 832 Views
It's not being used as a residence. No-one is living there. - 20/11/2013 04:26:05 PM 886 Views
The essence of the question was "Would you think it worth the bother to seek an injunction?" - 19/11/2013 07:01:30 PM 1025 Views
Yes, but subject to limitations. - 19/11/2013 07:03:40 PM 1152 Views
I would get the garden monitored with a camera - 17/11/2013 04:00:51 AM 860 Views
Not a possiblity. *NM* - 18/11/2013 07:17:35 PM 496 Views
I can't see much you can do really... - 19/11/2013 03:01:40 AM 883 Views
Does the building have a factor? - 19/11/2013 11:38:43 AM 830 Views
Yes indeed. - 19/11/2013 07:13:06 PM 806 Views

Reply to Message