The most reasonable thing would be to cut a bitch.
LiterateDog Send a noteboard - 16/11/2013 02:47:42 AM
I'm of two minds about this. I generally support lax land use regulation unless something is clearly a hazard or nuisance. But, I also wouldn't want to be in your situation. It's tricky. If the law allows for it, block it. If not, then you might have to at the very least monitor Miss E very closely and at the most extreme, follow Meg's advice and move.
I'm not very helpful, I know. But I do feel bad for you!
"I'll blow whomever I want, whenever I want, as long as I can still breathe and kneel."
-Samantha Jones, SatC
-Samantha Jones, SatC
What would you do?
15/11/2013 07:33:08 PM
- 2196 Views
Don't they need to apply for planning permission to do that?
15/11/2013 10:10:35 PM
- 953 Views
Also doesn't she need to apply for change of use to holiday let from residential?
15/11/2013 10:12:59 PM
- 904 Views
The most reasonable thing would be to cut a bitch.
16/11/2013 02:47:42 AM
- 1006 Views
Perhaps I don't grasp the gravity of the situation.
16/11/2013 03:52:15 PM
- 921 Views
It's more irritating that grave, but I do worry about security to an extent.
16/11/2013 07:47:02 PM
- 832 Views
Uh...isn't the nature of ownership that you can do what you want to with your property?
16/11/2013 10:27:05 PM
- 785 Views
Not always, according to what title deeds and zoning restrictions say. *NM*
16/11/2013 10:32:20 PM
- 397 Views
Well, then you do some research before you start a shit storm with your neighbors. *NM*
18/11/2013 03:42:43 PM
- 414 Views
Which obviously we have done, Tim being who he is and all. *NM*
18/11/2013 04:49:45 PM
- 427 Views
Well, so what is the neighbor doing wrong? *NM*
18/11/2013 05:50:25 PM
- 434 Views
It depends on interpretation, from what I understand.
18/11/2013 07:17:03 PM
- 853 Views
Well, I'm not licensed in Scotland
19/11/2013 03:04:02 PM
- 802 Views
How is a short-term holiday rental not a business?
19/11/2013 06:01:50 PM
- 934 Views
For zoning purposes it's being used as a residence. Don't be daft.
20/11/2013 02:24:54 PM
- 828 Views
The essence of the question was "Would you think it worth the bother to seek an injunction?"
19/11/2013 07:01:30 PM
- 1019 Views
I am a fan of British English usually, but not in the case of "flat". And yes, I'd go for interdict
20/11/2013 02:27:19 PM
- 826 Views
Though I always thought interdict was the Pope excommunicating an entire nation. *NM*
20/11/2013 02:30:23 PM
- 439 Views
Yes, but subject to limitations.
19/11/2013 07:03:40 PM
- 1147 Views
Yes, restrictive covenants. And those things can be unreasonable and still legal.
20/11/2013 02:29:45 PM
- 836 Views
I would get the garden monitored with a camera
17/11/2013 04:00:51 AM
- 854 Views