I was rather hoping when they put "raise retirement to 68 or 70", they mean in the near future.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 10/10/2013 09:36:22 PM
View original postI dop like how the only real answer offered to fix the social security problem is to tell young people they have to keep payiong for their grandparents at the current rate but they will have to work until they or 68 or 70. The boomers created the problem let them take the hit.
And not just for those starting their career only now - it's hard to see how that could have much of an effect on the deficit in the time period that they're talking about. If you're going to wait that long and let people retire at 65 (and join Medicare at 65) until then, they'll have to retire at 80, more like.
Holy Crap. I fixed the budget deficit.
08/10/2013 09:41:41 PM
- 1128 Views
Mine was 26% new taxes and 74% cuts. Capping Medicare goes a LOOOONG way.
09/10/2013 02:15:32 AM
- 638 Views
78% taxes, 22 % cuts
09/10/2013 10:03:32 AM
- 664 Views
In this country, we shoot people like you.
10/10/2013 08:41:41 PM
- 643 Views
Well, that's not very nice, is it? *NM*
10/10/2013 09:44:43 PM
- 286 Views
Neither is taking away the money that people have earned at confiscatory rates. *NM*
11/10/2013 12:04:54 AM
- 278 Views
there are other things in life besides love of money.... *NM*
11/10/2013 09:54:47 PM
- 238 Views
So your personal view on the value of money entitles you to steal it from others? *NM*
12/10/2013 05:18:47 AM
- 273 Views
"I got mine, fuck everyone else" is that really what you believe?
15/10/2013 09:03:37 PM
- 572 Views
How about "I earn mine, you earn yours"? *NM*
15/10/2013 09:08:32 PM
- 263 Views
i guess i wonder where you would go if you think the US rates are "confiscatory", that's all *NM*
17/10/2013 05:52:14 PM
- 245 Views
If onlt it were that simple
10/10/2013 06:01:35 PM
- 628 Views
I was rather hoping when they put "raise retirement to 68 or 70", they mean in the near future.
10/10/2013 09:36:22 PM
- 605 Views