i think the main problem here is that the terrorist label fits but you are too beholden to your party's interests to allow it to stand. i get it, you're a team player and always have been -- at least here in a public space. if you agree with the tactic, that is certainly your right. but you can't sit here and argue that the tactic of both taking the government hostage to issue political demands and threatening default on top of that are not severely destructive to the future of America. ted cruz can stand on the floor of the Senate and proclaim that Obamacare is equivalent to nazism, or paul broun can proclaim Obamacare will be "the destruction of everything", but seizing control of the federal government and issuing demands is "just a budget negotiation". sorry, the real world doesn't work like that.
one of your own put it best when he said "We have to get something out of this. And I don't know what that even is." your people don't know why they shut down the government, and have even less clue how to get out of it without having the Dems bail them out, which of course would be "capitulating" or something. even grover "drown government in a bathtub" norquist is against shutdown and default. the writing is on the wall for apparently everyone but the House gop to read that this shutdown/default fight is nothing less than insanity.
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman