Active Users:1120 Time:22/11/2024 02:55:23 PM
"... mandate[s]... a doctor who performs abortions have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital." - Edit 1

Before modification by Joel at 02/10/2013 01:55:15 AM


View original post
pro-choice fantics are every bit as radical and lacking in reason as the radical pro-life fantics.

As for your lack of understanding of Texas I really can't fault seeing how you are no damn forgiener but yumight want to find some rational news sources.


That Wikipedia statement has no less than FOUR independent citations (Texas Tribune, L.A. Times, The Eagle and the Austin American-Statesman.) I cannot decipher wtf that foreigner comment is supposed to mean, but I am a native Texan and know my home pretty well.
View original postThe "radical" new Texas abortion laws are nothing more than common sense changes accepted by most none radicalized and thinking people.

Uh huh. I missed the part where all other outpatient surgeons had to have admitting privileges at a hospital, because it is not like the Radical Republicans running the Lege these days would SINGLE OUT abortion for special treatment. Like, for example, by declaring a compelling state interest to prevent fetal pain, despite the fact the science on if/when fetal pain is even POSSIBLE remains very tenuous.

Still and so, Wendy Davis never once threatened (over objectiosn from half her party) to shut down all of Texas government just to get her own way.

The trouble with "my" news sources is evidently that they ARE news sources.

Return to message