Active Users:3645 Time:22/01/2025 05:44:43 PM
Yeah, I am trying to catch up now. Joel Send a noteboard - 10/08/2013 08:18:26 AM

The upside of departing for a half a year or so is that now I see as many "new" CMB posts as in wotmanias old days. I would feel worse about necroing if there were anything but tumbleweeds to disturb; what is it, like, 4 posts/day now? If there is a better argument to merge all the MBs, I cannot think of it.

Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
An NSFW question. - 16/04/2013 03:11:37 AM 1272 Views
Wait, what was your question again? *NM* - 16/04/2013 05:11:01 AM 381 Views
No. - 16/04/2013 05:49:20 AM 785 Views
I don't think so but quite possibly - 16/04/2013 05:50:00 AM 787 Views
"I just read it for the san serif." *NM* - 16/04/2013 08:11:45 PM 365 Views
I always wonder how "I just read it for the articles" can even come up - 16/04/2013 10:09:03 PM 797 Views
Probably with the old Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issues - 17/04/2013 11:43:04 AM 806 Views
That would make sense - 17/04/2013 01:32:34 PM 863 Views
That doesn't mean there's no swimsuit issue... - 17/04/2013 06:52:53 PM 828 Views
I think my brain almost melted from that first one - 17/04/2013 09:05:45 PM 737 Views
Because from Playboys very start Hefner tried to legitimize it with serious articles/interviews. - 10/08/2013 05:09:37 AM 662 Views
Good to hear from you again... I think... but you do realize I posted this 4 months ago right? *NM* - 10/08/2013 06:16:16 AM 370 Views
Yeah, I am trying to catch up now. - 10/08/2013 08:18:26 AM 646 Views
Nah, you just read something on a *different* web site... *NM* - 17/04/2013 04:36:44 AM 393 Views
BwAhAHHAhAhAhAaa.... - 22/04/2013 05:33:55 AM 748 Views
- 23/04/2013 03:17:53 AM 956 Views
Re: An NSFW question. - 24/04/2013 01:06:52 PM 697 Views
I would never read if that was true *NM* - 24/04/2013 05:16:13 PM 359 Views

Reply to Message