There is zero evidence to support Zimmerman's version of their initial encounter
Jay Sherman Send a noteboard - 19/07/2013 09:32:24 PM
View original post
If Martin had been afraid for his safety he could have simply go into his house. There was more than enough time. If Zimmerman had assaulted martin first he managed to do so ineffectively that he didn't leave a mark on him. The physical evidence and the only eyewitness to actually see the fight show Martin beating on Zimmerman while the only injuries to Martin where scraped knuckles and a gun shot wound. The rest is just made up narrative of people "know" happened based on their own personal bias and prejudiced. Just like the argument that we know Martin was profiled. Only evidence? He was black and lets not forget it happened in the south. Sounds like a clear cut case of racial bias and bigotry just got twisted in 180 is all.
If Martin had been afraid for his safety he could have simply go into his house. There was more than enough time. If Zimmerman had assaulted martin first he managed to do so ineffectively that he didn't leave a mark on him. The physical evidence and the only eyewitness to actually see the fight show Martin beating on Zimmerman while the only injuries to Martin where scraped knuckles and a gun shot wound. The rest is just made up narrative of people "know" happened based on their own personal bias and prejudiced. Just like the argument that we know Martin was profiled. Only evidence? He was black and lets not forget it happened in the south. Sounds like a clear cut case of racial bias and bigotry just got twisted in 180 is all.
If Zimmerman had not had a gun and he would not have shot Martin it would have been a pretty simple case to convict martin of assault. If Martin had not been black the case never would have went to court.
None of the eyewitnesses could positively identify who was on top of whom during the fight, so using their testimony as truth is kind of hard to reconcile. But if some stranger followed you in his car, got out of his car and pursued you on foot, would you have just run home? Martin was shot several houses away from home, it was not a matter of simply "go into his house". Otherwise I'm sure he would have thought of that. The main point still stands: There is no place in this story for Martin to be afraid of Zimmerman. Everyone who has been 100% on Zimmerman's side (not just that the acquittal was the correct verdict but willfully choosing to believe Zimmerman's story) will not allow for Martin to be a scared teenager. For whatever reason, people like yourself place a lot of credibility in Zimmerman that he does not deserve.
Zimmerman = Not Guilty
- 14/07/2013 04:04:07 AM
1859 Views
Any charge, other than stupidity, was rediculous. *NM*
- 14/07/2013 04:24:09 AM
536 Views
But hey...
- 14/07/2013 05:35:11 AM
1081 Views
And THAT is the scary precendent this case sets for the populace
- 14/07/2013 05:28:03 PM
1212 Views
Oh puhleeze... can you get any more rediculous? *NM*
- 14/07/2013 07:22:52 PM
661 Views
HyogaRott baby, you are hurting me here. Can you please stop this?
- 14/07/2013 11:29:00 PM
970 Views
Re: And THAT is the scary precendent this case sets for the populace
- 14/07/2013 07:32:26 PM
1016 Views
So it was okay that he was on top of a guy, pounding his head into the pavement?
- 14/07/2013 06:45:17 PM
949 Views
If you can believe Zimmerman's side of the story is 100% truth, I have a bridge for sale...
- 15/07/2013 05:35:08 PM
1081 Views
Silly post - following someone around is not legal justification for physical assault.
- 15/07/2013 12:47:54 AM
890 Views
And lying about self-defense should not be grounds for acquittal of all charges, but there you go *NM*
- 15/07/2013 05:43:15 PM
591 Views
I think it all really has to do with reasonable doubt
- 16/07/2013 01:08:24 PM
973 Views
The burden of proof should have been on the shooter to prove lethal force was necessary
- 16/07/2013 06:52:17 PM
826 Views
So, you prefer "guilty until proven innocent"?
- 16/07/2013 06:54:56 PM
847 Views
Yes, and I also eat babies for breakfast and make sure I kick at least one puppy a day *facepalm*
- 16/07/2013 07:13:11 PM
1096 Views
Re: The burden of proof should have been on the shooter to prove lethal force was necessary
- 16/07/2013 07:18:36 PM
906 Views
Re: The burden of proof should have been on the shooter to prove lethal force was necessary
- 16/07/2013 07:21:42 PM
944 Views
Re: The burden of proof should have been on the shooter to prove lethal force was necessary
- 16/07/2013 07:30:39 PM
946 Views
The kid decided to beat a man who had a gun and got shot for it
- 15/07/2013 03:46:38 AM
973 Views
In a sane world, here is how their interaction plays out
- 15/07/2013 05:44:26 PM
926 Views
Yes. And the fact that he didn't simply ask him what he was doing, tells me he was racial profiling
- 15/07/2013 08:59:41 PM
922 Views
The only way that statement makes sense is if it is sarcasm
- 16/07/2013 12:46:59 PM
864 Views
You are suggesting that it is better to shoot first rather than engage in diplomacy
- 16/07/2013 07:05:32 PM
934 Views
And you continue to ignore all the evidence that supports the theory that Martin attacked Zimmerman
- 16/07/2013 07:20:55 PM
922 Views
You are defending a known liar with a history of domestic violence
- 16/07/2013 07:23:11 PM
996 Views
Actually I am not defending anyone (except the rule of law).
- 16/07/2013 08:00:38 PM
924 Views
You keep insisting that Martin started the fight, giving him no chance of his own self-defense right
- 16/07/2013 09:25:17 PM
887 Views
Please, Please, PLEASE actually read the laws of Florida that I have posted a link to for you.
- 16/07/2013 09:41:15 PM
918 Views
I have read the laws you linked to, I fail to see how they cannot also apply to Martin
- 16/07/2013 10:40:46 PM
873 Views
You failed to identify any laws. *NM*
- 16/07/2013 10:49:20 PM
511 Views
I saved it for the reply to Isaac below if you really need it *NM*
- 16/07/2013 11:07:53 PM
657 Views
Re: I have read the laws you linked to, I fail to see how they cannot also apply to Martin
- 17/07/2013 03:41:58 AM
917 Views
And tomorrow I get to preach about the Good Samaritan.
- 14/07/2013 05:26:50 AM
1138 Views
Where's your forgiveness?? Judge not lest ye be judged.
- 14/07/2013 07:10:14 PM
907 Views
Did I say a thing about Zimmerman? No.
- 14/07/2013 08:44:26 PM
1049 Views
Oh my gosh. I'm so sorry. Which neighborhood watch were you referring to?
- 15/07/2013 12:46:44 AM
1027 Views
Float your concept of grace in front of your priest sometime.
- 15/07/2013 04:31:34 AM
890 Views
What concept of grace is that? Where did I discuss anything remotely touching on grace?
- 19/07/2013 12:10:12 PM
883 Views
Time to climb to the roof of the city morgue and light the Dexter signal. *NM*
- 15/07/2013 04:41:35 AM
620 Views
You'd think the rain of venom in here would make everyone's soapbox too slippery to stand on
- 15/07/2013 01:05:41 PM
933 Views
would that be true for most of politics as well? *NM*
- 16/07/2013 12:58:33 PM
558 Views
Depends on the case, but those aren't individual life and death criminal trials
- 16/07/2013 01:52:00 PM
844 Views
when the president gets involved it is safe to polotics are at play.
- 16/07/2013 06:23:54 PM
904 Views
That's not an unfair remark but it justifies criticizing him, not also getting involved in the case
- 16/07/2013 06:59:53 PM
918 Views
When a case shows glaring holes in the law, it should by nature cause those laws to be reconsidered
- 16/07/2013 07:18:57 PM
996 Views
I'm not sure what those 'glaring holes' are, but a specific person shouldn't be needed to show them
- 16/07/2013 08:18:38 PM
900 Views
To assist you with Isaac's request, here is the link to the Laws in Florida
- 16/07/2013 08:23:14 PM
923 Views
It is a bit difficult to not use the case when the specificity of the case is the problem....
- 16/07/2013 11:06:59 PM
977 Views
I sympathize with that but I think it remains a moral necessity to do so
- 17/07/2013 12:14:39 AM
1053 Views
Re: I sympathize with that but I think it remains a moral necessity to do so
- 17/07/2013 05:29:56 PM
1036 Views
You are asking for what already exists, and are/were in force at the time.
- 17/07/2013 06:33:54 PM
1037 Views
I think you've over-personalized this case
- 17/07/2013 08:00:50 PM
998 Views
I think this case is simply the closest example at hand of a perceived lack of justice
- 17/07/2013 10:34:38 PM
1020 Views
Re: I think this case is simply the closest example at hand of a perceived lack of justice
- 18/07/2013 01:39:17 AM
1164 Views
Jury Instruction 3 - w/ link to pdf of model FL jury instruction for all criminal cases
- 18/07/2013 09:51:47 PM
925 Views
Your logical error is failing to realize that me following you does NOT meet the statutes
- 17/07/2013 04:01:52 AM
942 Views
Why do you insist on stating things that have been demonstrated to be false?
- 16/07/2013 08:19:08 PM
732 Views
Well said.
- 17/07/2013 02:25:36 PM
1060 Views
it is possible to discuss a case based on what the evidence shows
- 17/07/2013 06:03:05 PM
1017 Views
Of course it is possible, one just fails to see how it can serve any good end
- 17/07/2013 09:43:02 PM
909 Views
That just brings us full circle to my orignal reply to you
- 18/07/2013 02:52:15 AM
956 Views
Re: That just brings us full circle to my orignal reply to you
- 18/07/2013 04:09:51 AM
1060 Views
are agree with your general concept
- 18/07/2013 05:20:41 PM
1197 Views
My concern all along has been what the laws actually are, and to clear the air of the BS.
- 18/07/2013 06:06:21 PM
919 Views
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/frame_game/2013/07/trayvon_martin_verdict_racism_hat
- 18/07/2013 02:04:36 AM
999 Views
Perhaps one day black people will have the same rights as whites in the US
- 15/07/2013 05:30:00 PM
1048 Views
Congratulations on making one of the dumbest statemets of the year. *NM*
- 15/07/2013 09:00:46 PM
600 Views
You have tried retroatcively making Martin a criminal here, despite him doing nothing wrong
- 15/07/2013 10:52:32 PM
938 Views
I really shouldn't bother but I will try one more time to introduce you to rational thought.
- 16/07/2013 05:31:12 AM
835 Views
So you support attacking creepy crackers who you think are following you?
- 16/07/2013 12:56:52 PM
925 Views
The law suggests that if I fear for my safety, I am justified in attacking first in self-defense
- 18/07/2013 11:00:58 PM
1026 Views
there is zero evidience to support that assumption
- 19/07/2013 04:25:15 AM
868 Views
There is zero evidence to support Zimmerman's version of their initial encounter
- 19/07/2013 09:32:24 PM
944 Views
Sorry but you have your facts wrong Martin was identified as the person top
- 20/07/2013 01:32:00 AM
876 Views
Let's see - Martin was using drugs.....
- 16/07/2013 04:56:13 PM
917 Views
Funny how black victims are rare enough to be famous.
- 19/07/2013 12:24:12 PM
871 Views
Please cite the legal statutes Trayvon Martin violated before Zimmerman approached him
- 19/07/2013 10:24:59 PM
956 Views
Do you have any actual facts to prove Zimmerman mad his story or is it pure bias?
- 20/07/2013 04:21:55 PM
926 Views