I'd like to see some additional sourcing and corroboration on this one as well because, on its face, such an instruction appears to be contrary to actual Florida black letter law (776.041.2 which explicitly states when an "aggressor" can claim self defense).
Additionally, the word "follow" appears nowhere in the self defense statute.
Zimmerman = Not Guilty
14/07/2013 04:04:07 AM
- 1782 Views
Any charge, other than stupidity, was rediculous. *NM*
14/07/2013 04:24:09 AM
- 504 Views
But hey...
14/07/2013 05:35:11 AM
- 1006 Views
And THAT is the scary precendent this case sets for the populace
14/07/2013 05:28:03 PM
- 1134 Views
Oh puhleeze... can you get any more rediculous? *NM*
14/07/2013 07:22:52 PM
- 627 Views
HyogaRott baby, you are hurting me here. Can you please stop this?
14/07/2013 11:29:00 PM
- 885 Views
Re: And THAT is the scary precendent this case sets for the populace
14/07/2013 07:32:26 PM
- 934 Views
So it was okay that he was on top of a guy, pounding his head into the pavement?
14/07/2013 06:45:17 PM
- 910 Views
If you can believe Zimmerman's side of the story is 100% truth, I have a bridge for sale...
15/07/2013 05:35:08 PM
- 1008 Views
Silly post - following someone around is not legal justification for physical assault.
15/07/2013 12:47:54 AM
- 817 Views
And lying about self-defense should not be grounds for acquittal of all charges, but there you go *NM*
15/07/2013 05:43:15 PM
- 558 Views
I think it all really has to do with reasonable doubt
16/07/2013 01:08:24 PM
- 892 Views
The burden of proof should have been on the shooter to prove lethal force was necessary
16/07/2013 06:52:17 PM
- 756 Views
So, you prefer "guilty until proven innocent"?
16/07/2013 06:54:56 PM
- 764 Views
Yes, and I also eat babies for breakfast and make sure I kick at least one puppy a day *facepalm*
16/07/2013 07:13:11 PM
- 1015 Views
Re: The burden of proof should have been on the shooter to prove lethal force was necessary
16/07/2013 07:18:36 PM
- 833 Views
Re: The burden of proof should have been on the shooter to prove lethal force was necessary
16/07/2013 07:21:42 PM
- 854 Views
Re: The burden of proof should have been on the shooter to prove lethal force was necessary
16/07/2013 07:30:39 PM
- 864 Views
The kid decided to beat a man who had a gun and got shot for it
15/07/2013 03:46:38 AM
- 883 Views
In a sane world, here is how their interaction plays out
15/07/2013 05:44:26 PM
- 851 Views
Yes. And the fact that he didn't simply ask him what he was doing, tells me he was racial profiling
15/07/2013 08:59:41 PM
- 845 Views
The only way that statement makes sense is if it is sarcasm
16/07/2013 12:46:59 PM
- 790 Views
You are suggesting that it is better to shoot first rather than engage in diplomacy
16/07/2013 07:05:32 PM
- 854 Views
And you continue to ignore all the evidence that supports the theory that Martin attacked Zimmerman
16/07/2013 07:20:55 PM
- 828 Views
You are defending a known liar with a history of domestic violence
16/07/2013 07:23:11 PM
- 916 Views
Actually I am not defending anyone (except the rule of law).
16/07/2013 08:00:38 PM
- 845 Views
You keep insisting that Martin started the fight, giving him no chance of his own self-defense right
16/07/2013 09:25:17 PM
- 806 Views
Please, Please, PLEASE actually read the laws of Florida that I have posted a link to for you.
16/07/2013 09:41:15 PM
- 837 Views
I have read the laws you linked to, I fail to see how they cannot also apply to Martin
16/07/2013 10:40:46 PM
- 802 Views
You failed to identify any laws. *NM*
16/07/2013 10:49:20 PM
- 482 Views
I saved it for the reply to Isaac below if you really need it *NM*
16/07/2013 11:07:53 PM
- 620 Views
Re: I have read the laws you linked to, I fail to see how they cannot also apply to Martin
17/07/2013 03:41:58 AM
- 833 Views
And tomorrow I get to preach about the Good Samaritan.
14/07/2013 05:26:50 AM
- 1070 Views
Where's your forgiveness?? Judge not lest ye be judged.
14/07/2013 07:10:14 PM
- 834 Views
Did I say a thing about Zimmerman? No.
14/07/2013 08:44:26 PM
- 969 Views
Oh my gosh. I'm so sorry. Which neighborhood watch were you referring to?
15/07/2013 12:46:44 AM
- 934 Views
Float your concept of grace in front of your priest sometime.
15/07/2013 04:31:34 AM
- 805 Views
What concept of grace is that? Where did I discuss anything remotely touching on grace?
19/07/2013 12:10:12 PM
- 817 Views
Time to climb to the roof of the city morgue and light the Dexter signal. *NM*
15/07/2013 04:41:35 AM
- 584 Views
You'd think the rain of venom in here would make everyone's soapbox too slippery to stand on
15/07/2013 01:05:41 PM
- 849 Views
would that be true for most of politics as well? *NM*
16/07/2013 12:58:33 PM
- 524 Views
Depends on the case, but those aren't individual life and death criminal trials
16/07/2013 01:52:00 PM
- 768 Views
when the president gets involved it is safe to polotics are at play.
16/07/2013 06:23:54 PM
- 823 Views
That's not an unfair remark but it justifies criticizing him, not also getting involved in the case
16/07/2013 06:59:53 PM
- 836 Views
When a case shows glaring holes in the law, it should by nature cause those laws to be reconsidered
16/07/2013 07:18:57 PM
- 926 Views
I'm not sure what those 'glaring holes' are, but a specific person shouldn't be needed to show them
16/07/2013 08:18:38 PM
- 828 Views
To assist you with Isaac's request, here is the link to the Laws in Florida
16/07/2013 08:23:14 PM
- 849 Views
It is a bit difficult to not use the case when the specificity of the case is the problem....
16/07/2013 11:06:59 PM
- 895 Views
I sympathize with that but I think it remains a moral necessity to do so
17/07/2013 12:14:39 AM
- 962 Views
Re: I sympathize with that but I think it remains a moral necessity to do so
17/07/2013 05:29:56 PM
- 960 Views
You are asking for what already exists, and are/were in force at the time.
17/07/2013 06:33:54 PM
- 964 Views
I think you've over-personalized this case
17/07/2013 08:00:50 PM
- 880 Views
I think this case is simply the closest example at hand of a perceived lack of justice
17/07/2013 10:34:38 PM
- 934 Views
Re: I think this case is simply the closest example at hand of a perceived lack of justice
18/07/2013 01:39:17 AM
- 1076 Views
Jury instructions
18/07/2013 04:12:29 AM
- 1027 Views
Jury Instruction 3 - w/ link to pdf of model FL jury instruction for all criminal cases
18/07/2013 09:51:47 PM
- 855 Views
Your logical error is failing to realize that me following you does NOT meet the statutes
17/07/2013 04:01:52 AM
- 855 Views
Why do you insist on stating things that have been demonstrated to be false?
16/07/2013 08:19:08 PM
- 643 Views
Well said.
17/07/2013 02:25:36 PM
- 981 Views
it is possible to discuss a case based on what the evidence shows
17/07/2013 06:03:05 PM
- 967 Views
Of course it is possible, one just fails to see how it can serve any good end
17/07/2013 09:43:02 PM
- 836 Views
That just brings us full circle to my orignal reply to you
18/07/2013 02:52:15 AM
- 870 Views
Re: That just brings us full circle to my orignal reply to you
18/07/2013 04:09:51 AM
- 983 Views
are agree with your general concept
18/07/2013 05:20:41 PM
- 1111 Views
My concern all along has been what the laws actually are, and to clear the air of the BS.
18/07/2013 06:06:21 PM
- 844 Views
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/frame_game/2013/07/trayvon_martin_verdict_racism_hat
18/07/2013 02:04:36 AM
- 920 Views
Perhaps one day black people will have the same rights as whites in the US
15/07/2013 05:30:00 PM
- 971 Views
Congratulations on making one of the dumbest statemets of the year. *NM*
15/07/2013 09:00:46 PM
- 566 Views
You have tried retroatcively making Martin a criminal here, despite him doing nothing wrong
15/07/2013 10:52:32 PM
- 855 Views
I really shouldn't bother but I will try one more time to introduce you to rational thought.
16/07/2013 05:31:12 AM
- 750 Views
So you support attacking creepy crackers who you think are following you?
16/07/2013 12:56:52 PM
- 853 Views
The law suggests that if I fear for my safety, I am justified in attacking first in self-defense
18/07/2013 11:00:58 PM
- 922 Views
there is zero evidience to support that assumption
19/07/2013 04:25:15 AM
- 788 Views
There is zero evidence to support Zimmerman's version of their initial encounter
19/07/2013 09:32:24 PM
- 856 Views
Sorry but you have your facts wrong Martin was identified as the person top
20/07/2013 01:32:00 AM
- 803 Views
Let's see - Martin was using drugs.....
16/07/2013 04:56:13 PM
- 844 Views
Funny how black victims are rare enough to be famous.
19/07/2013 12:24:12 PM
- 786 Views
Please cite the legal statutes Trayvon Martin violated before Zimmerman approached him
19/07/2013 10:24:59 PM
- 885 Views
Do you have any actual facts to prove Zimmerman mad his story or is it pure bias?
20/07/2013 04:21:55 PM
- 846 Views