Active Users:406 Time:04/04/2025 11:54:16 AM
Re: It is for fiction, yes. Isaac Send a noteboard - 17/07/2013 11:48:43 AM

View original post
View original postGreeks a nice one cause you can bust out 'Archon', one of those titles that sounds properly bad ass and isn't as overused as Emperor or King. It sounds interesting, its alway more fun to read stuff by people you know. I'd offer myself as an alpha reader but my only two modes are usually 'I liked it' or the sorts of extreme nitpicking that don't help a story, I think last time I unloaded on someone for their insistence on having railroads, which typically weigh about a hundred tons a league, but having steel armor so incredibly expensive only nobles could afford it even though the odds of a reader giving a shit were minimal, and I'm about ten times worse with sci-fi.


View original postWait, so they had a 19th-century style, iron-built, steam railway in an otherwise medieval fantasy environment?

Well its been done a time or two I'm not actually sure if you're being sarcastic or not so I'll assume not. The Bessemer Process isn't complex, not even as much as a lot of routinely employed tech from the general fantasy era-mish-mash. The actual device could be explained to any competent engineer of almost any era and built. Iron ore is anything but uncommon, production has always been about labor and fuel. Steel had already been getting cheaper and more plentiful for a century or so before Bessmeer but right on the spot it dropped to about a fifth the price, but that was invented in 1850 something, we already had railroads by then but they didn't really get cheap until then. Bessemer itself doesn't matter, its just the highest tech steel production means I know I could show and explain to someone from antiquity. What matters is that you can make around a million suits of heavy jousting armor with the same metal as a you'd need to drop a rail line from Paris to Berlin, and if you had the typical fantasy-Europe with the big cities connected by a ten thousand or so kilometers of rail nobody is going to be dragging peasant clad in cloth and armed with pitchforks off to war, led by a few nobles in shining armor.

Now steam engines are another story, those aren't that terribly complicated but they're complicated enough that anyone smart enough to make them is going to be thinking about other applications and modifications. Of course someone can always wave the magic wand and have it powered by a magic widget.

That's what I meant about nitpicking though, a person could shoehorn in a reason why metal was still rare but they still had railroads, and they probably not even need to bother at all.

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
A question related to ancient Greek words - 16/07/2013 09:58:53 PM 944 Views
Tom's your man for this one, I'd say, maybe Danny or Gabriel - 16/07/2013 10:50:49 PM 692 Views
It is for fiction, yes. - 16/07/2013 11:12:04 PM 653 Views
Re: It is for fiction, yes. - 17/07/2013 01:17:19 AM 742 Views
Re: It is for fiction, yes. - 17/07/2013 10:34:36 AM 607 Views
Re: It is for fiction, yes. - 17/07/2013 11:48:43 AM 703 Views
That would bug the hell out of me. - 17/07/2013 03:49:12 PM 686 Views
I'd bet few readers would notice or care though - 17/07/2013 05:26:12 PM 771 Views
Thanks. - 18/07/2013 04:34:23 PM 634 Views
Language is a great way to set a game up. - 18/07/2013 05:55:49 PM 685 Views
It adds some flavor and style - 18/07/2013 06:23:01 PM 565 Views
50 = pentêkonta. Year = etos. - 17/07/2013 12:00:09 AM 762 Views
Nice. - 17/07/2013 12:06:59 AM 618 Views
"Fifty years old" is πεντηκονταετης or πεντηκοντουτης - 18/07/2013 12:20:58 PM 556 Views
If I'm converting the letters correctly ... - 18/07/2013 04:20:49 PM 627 Views
The answer is Pentakron... - 18/07/2013 06:02:11 PM 699 Views
Re: The answer is Pentakron... *NM* - 18/07/2013 06:02:34 PM 284 Views

Reply to Message