I certainly debunked the closing lines of your previous post quite smoothly:
"Islam CAN be a religion of peace, but only when the practitioners of it publicly rise up AGAINST those who would have it be something else and make it be one. Unfortunately, they have never done this, and I seriously doubt it will occur in my lifetime."
Of course, if by "points" you mean a watered-down version of what you actually write, some kind of summary of your posts if one were to filter the exaggerations and hyperbole and downright nonsense out, then those may well stand, yes.
All the same, you have to admit, those pictures from Iran are great. Never saw those before.
For every "point" you raised there are many more that go in the opposite direction. The Saudi Mullah you referenced also declared that all christian churches in the Arabian Peninsula should be destroyed (BTW: there are no christian churches allowed in Saudi Arabia). Imagine the outcry if the Pope made a similar statement about all the mosques in Italy.
As for picture captions, I take them with a very large grain of salt. Don't forget that the original caption of the picture of Ambassador Stevens described it as a bunch of helpful Libyans taking him to the hospital, when in fact they were dragging his raped corpse through the streets...
When a religion has as one of its tenants that it is not only allowed, but encouraged to lie to people who are not of your faith, it makes it rather hard to believe what they say. If you ignore their words, but instead look at their actions...