View original post
It is possible to support background checks and limitations on magazine capacity, and still support the right to bear arms. Just sayin'
It is possible to support background checks and limitations on magazine capacity, and still support the right to bear arms. Just sayin'

Just to be clear...
20/04/2013 03:32:07 AM
- 1180 Views
Of course it is
20/04/2013 04:18:27 AM
- 574 Views
But, they is us
23/04/2013 03:13:27 AM
- 753 Views
First of all, I don't believe that 90% of the population support it
23/04/2013 04:55:02 AM
- 791 Views
Just to be clear it is possible to support freedom of the press &support censorship of the internet
20/04/2013 05:03:26 AM
- 699 Views
Well played
23/04/2013 03:20:34 AM
- 843 Views

No you really can't
23/04/2013 05:59:04 PM
- 744 Views
That's the most amusingly incomprehensible attempt at constitutional analysis I've read in a while. *NM*
26/04/2013 10:47:18 AM
- 301 Views
How so? It made sense to me
26/04/2013 03:10:11 PM
- 584 Views
Presumption of innocence isn't part of the constitution.
26/04/2013 09:30:17 PM
- 626 Views
I think that's being a bit pedantic, to be kind
26/04/2013 11:13:33 PM
- 826 Views
I am not trying to pick a fight with you or anyone else. I'm very curious.
29/04/2013 02:34:19 PM
- 652 Views
Same. Willing to hear counterarguments, though. *NM*
21/04/2013 02:59:33 PM
- 357 Views
about 90% of the country agrees with that but still Obama can't close the deal.
21/04/2013 04:24:15 PM
- 810 Views
the fact that 90% support it should be obvious that most see it as *a* solution
22/04/2013 05:32:42 PM
- 612 Views
the fact that Obama can get a bil through the senate when it has 90% support show a fialure ot lead
23/04/2013 04:29:07 AM
- 701 Views
the fact that Obama can get a bil through the senate when it has 90% support show a fialure ot lead
23/04/2013 04:29:13 AM
- 699 Views
Yep
23/04/2013 03:47:12 AM
- 812 Views
90% also believes constanly blaiming others for your own failure is a sign of weakness
23/04/2013 04:55:53 AM
- 674 Views
You're smarter than this
23/04/2013 06:41:09 AM
- 597 Views
but is wasn't heavily favored it just polls well
24/04/2013 05:56:41 PM
- 704 Views
..and that is where the misinformation comes into play
24/04/2013 07:35:51 PM
- 659 Views
And that reply makes my point
26/04/2013 05:49:53 PM
- 728 Views
The point is that background checks already exist on every commercial firearm transaction.
27/04/2013 05:16:41 AM
- 755 Views
but we all know there is no correlation between having a gun and shooting someone with it
22/04/2013 05:30:12 PM
- 684 Views
I wonder which other Constitutional rights should require a background check to excercise? *NM*
22/04/2013 08:56:15 PM
- 254 Views
How about just the ones that can have potentially lethal consequences for other citizens?
23/04/2013 03:56:25 AM
- 718 Views
Just to be clear: another hypocrisy of the right wing
04/05/2013 06:37:31 PM
- 840 Views
When posting into dead threads it helps to A) Be on topic or B) Make intelligent points
04/05/2013 08:08:46 PM
- 4903 Views