View original post
It is possible to support background checks and limitations on magazine capacity, and still support the right to bear arms. Just sayin'
It is possible to support background checks and limitations on magazine capacity, and still support the right to bear arms. Just sayin'
Just to be clear...
20/04/2013 03:32:07 AM
- 1089 Views
Of course it is
20/04/2013 04:18:27 AM
- 517 Views
But, they is us
23/04/2013 03:13:27 AM
- 681 Views
First of all, I don't believe that 90% of the population support it
23/04/2013 04:55:02 AM
- 718 Views
Just to be clear it is possible to support freedom of the press &support censorship of the internet
20/04/2013 05:03:26 AM
- 641 Views
Well played
23/04/2013 03:20:34 AM
- 781 Views
No you really can't
23/04/2013 05:59:04 PM
- 678 Views
That's the most amusingly incomprehensible attempt at constitutional analysis I've read in a while. *NM*
26/04/2013 10:47:18 AM
- 271 Views
How so? It made sense to me
26/04/2013 03:10:11 PM
- 521 Views
Presumption of innocence isn't part of the constitution.
26/04/2013 09:30:17 PM
- 553 Views
I think that's being a bit pedantic, to be kind
26/04/2013 11:13:33 PM
- 765 Views
I am not trying to pick a fight with you or anyone else. I'm very curious.
29/04/2013 02:34:19 PM
- 576 Views
yes *NM*
20/04/2013 06:26:27 AM
- 346 Views
about 90% of the country agrees with that but still Obama can't close the deal.
21/04/2013 04:24:15 PM
- 748 Views
the fact that 90% support it should be obvious that most see it as *a* solution
22/04/2013 05:32:42 PM
- 534 Views
the fact that Obama can get a bil through the senate when it has 90% support show a fialure ot lead
23/04/2013 04:29:07 AM
- 636 Views
the fact that Obama can get a bil through the senate when it has 90% support show a fialure ot lead
23/04/2013 04:29:13 AM
- 633 Views
Yep
23/04/2013 03:47:12 AM
- 754 Views
90% also believes constanly blaiming others for your own failure is a sign of weakness
23/04/2013 04:55:53 AM
- 634 Views
You're smarter than this
23/04/2013 06:41:09 AM
- 537 Views
but is wasn't heavily favored it just polls well
24/04/2013 05:56:41 PM
- 633 Views
..and that is where the misinformation comes into play
24/04/2013 07:35:51 PM
- 588 Views
And that reply makes my point
26/04/2013 05:49:53 PM
- 663 Views
The point is that background checks already exist on every commercial firearm transaction.
27/04/2013 05:16:41 AM
- 683 Views
but we all know there is no correlation between having a gun and shooting someone with it
22/04/2013 05:30:12 PM
- 624 Views
I wonder which other Constitutional rights should require a background check to excercise? *NM*
22/04/2013 08:56:15 PM
- 240 Views
How about just the ones that can have potentially lethal consequences for other citizens?
23/04/2013 03:56:25 AM
- 651 Views
Just to be clear: another hypocrisy of the right wing
04/05/2013 06:37:31 PM
- 767 Views
When posting into dead threads it helps to A) Be on topic or B) Make intelligent points
04/05/2013 08:08:46 PM
- 4819 Views