Active Users:1084 Time:22/11/2024 11:11:21 PM
it would require a constitutional amendment, but i think we could get it to pass.... *NM* moondog Send a noteboard - 10/04/2013 11:24:26 PM

View original post
You get that check box if you want $3 to Presidential election campaign fund, I find myself wondering how effective a similar check box would be for annual congressional/presidential pay?

Like, these guys make, Sen/house/Pres combined, somewhere around a billion dollars. I wonder how effective it would be if we left a tax checkbox "Check here if you want $5 to got to federal elected official pay" or "Check $0, $1, $5, $10, $25" and people can do a bit of that voting with their pocket book thing.

So you pay all of them exactly minimum wage, and we total up all the cash allocated on the tax returns. There's something like 160 million filed each year IIRC. You divide that evenly, or proportionally (Pres/VP get a bigger share etc) and that's what they make, min wage plus whatever the citizens feel like giving them when they are filing their taxes. Same as the Pres Fund, it is not a donation coming directly from your own taxes, so nobody would be checking it to personally save money.

Personally, I think the idea is brilliant


"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
President Obama and Defense Secretary Hagel take pay cuts to lessen impact of sequester - 03/04/2013 09:47:45 PM 723 Views
The sequester was Obama's idea, so he should CYA. - 04/04/2013 12:16:59 AM 529 Views
The US economony only lost 3.1 percent between 2008 to 2009 - 04/04/2013 03:55:05 AM 561 Views
We do need to cut, cut, cut... - 10/04/2013 03:38:45 PM 661 Views
I don't care about any quantities under a million - 04/04/2013 03:40:25 AM 490 Views
the president can't pass a budget you know.... - 04/04/2013 04:45:38 AM 502 Views
No, but he is required by law to submit one, and he has not. - 05/04/2013 06:10:24 PM 526 Views
good job getting your analysis from right wing media and pushing the lies they tell you - 05/04/2013 07:04:05 PM 651 Views
good job on displaying more of your ignorance or willful blindness - 06/04/2013 03:34:27 PM 512 Views
quoting from the second article you linked..... - 06/04/2013 04:23:48 PM 477 Views
*SIGH* - 07/04/2013 12:58:12 AM 559 Views
They need to cut hundreds of billions, not millions; and not over a fake 10 year period either. *NM* - 05/04/2013 06:13:37 PM 249 Views
Yes we need to cut hundreds of billions of dollars - 06/04/2013 03:17:01 AM 485 Views
Not really - 06/04/2013 03:54:56 PM 485 Views
as long as debt and/or deficit is less than GDP they are manageable - 06/04/2013 04:30:42 PM 617 Views
Deficits - 07/04/2013 01:13:41 AM 481 Views
Deficits are a big deal with times are good - 07/04/2013 03:40:36 AM 496 Views
Re: Not really - 07/04/2013 03:29:59 AM 766 Views
Ya know, semi-tangent but I just had an amusing notion about elected official pay - 10/04/2013 07:12:56 PM 552 Views
it would require a constitutional amendment, but i think we could get it to pass.... *NM* - 10/04/2013 11:24:26 PM 266 Views
I'm not sure it would, it could be made voluntary too - 10/04/2013 11:41:54 PM 520 Views

Reply to Message