considering that nobody in Congress is losing pay or their job, it's a good precedent IMHO
moondog Send a noteboard - 03/04/2013 10:43:45 PM
this is the biggest joke of the sequester: everyone but Congress loses on the government budget cuts. as of now it's a largely symbolic gesture, and i'm sure very shortly we'll hear a republican rep or senator decry this as symbolism. but i highly doubt they will put their own money up even after they complain about the arbitrariness of the cuts on programs they like. it's much easier for them all to sit on the sidelines and cry than to prevent people losing their jobs.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
President Obama and Defense Secretary Hagel take pay cuts to lessen impact of sequester
- 03/04/2013 09:47:45 PM
722 Views
Well, it's more of a CYA-against-bad-press symbolic gesture than an impressive one.
- 03/04/2013 10:15:40 PM
613 Views
considering that nobody in Congress is losing pay or their job, it's a good precedent IMHO
- 03/04/2013 10:43:45 PM
466 Views
I don't care about any quantities under a million
- 04/04/2013 03:40:25 AM
489 Views
the president can't pass a budget you know.... 
- 04/04/2013 04:45:38 AM
501 Views
- 04/04/2013 04:45:38 AM
501 Views
No, but he is required by law to submit one, and he has not.
- 05/04/2013 06:10:24 PM
525 Views
good job getting your analysis from right wing media and pushing the lies they tell you
- 05/04/2013 07:04:05 PM
650 Views
good job on displaying more of your ignorance or willful blindness
- 06/04/2013 03:34:27 PM
511 Views
They need to cut hundreds of billions, not millions; and not over a fake 10 year period either. *NM*
- 05/04/2013 06:13:37 PM
249 Views
yes, because everyone knows the way out of recession is to prevent job creation 
*NM*
- 05/04/2013 07:04:49 PM
260 Views
*NM*
- 05/04/2013 07:04:49 PM
260 Views
Federal spending can not create real, sustainable, job growth. *NM*
- 06/04/2013 03:39:52 PM
287 Views
it doesn't have to, that's why they call it "stimulus" *NM*
- 06/04/2013 04:08:04 PM
275 Views
Yeah, and I can call your mama, your daddy, but it don't change who they are. *NM*
- 07/04/2013 01:15:05 AM
258 Views
Yes we need to cut hundreds of billions of dollars
- 06/04/2013 03:17:01 AM
484 Views
Not really
- 06/04/2013 03:54:56 PM
485 Views
as long as debt and/or deficit is less than GDP they are manageable
- 06/04/2013 04:30:42 PM
616 Views
You do know why we use 10 year time periods with cbo numbers right? *NM*
- 06/04/2013 03:17:41 AM
266 Views
Yeah, so they can claim a dime of imaginary savings is a dollar. *NM*
- 06/04/2013 03:37:39 PM
246 Views
No anything past 10 years in projections are a joke.
- 07/04/2013 03:02:32 AM
544 Views
Anything past 1 year is a joke/lie becuase the next Congrees will do what it wants regardless. *NM*
- 07/04/2013 03:08:39 PM
278 Views
Ya know, semi-tangent but I just had an amusing notion about elected official pay
- 10/04/2013 07:12:56 PM
552 Views
it would require a constitutional amendment, but i think we could get it to pass.... *NM*
- 10/04/2013 11:24:26 PM
265 Views