Active Users:1101 Time:22/11/2024 09:08:26 AM
Us and most Vaticanists it appears DomA Send a noteboard - 13/03/2013 11:49:29 PM

View original postJorge Bergoglio chose the name of Pope Francis I today, March 13.

They all let the fact a candidate once rejected supposedly isn't put forward again in future conclaves blind them to Bergoglio's chances this time around.

It's not a very surprising choice, though. He had gained as much as 40 votes against Ratzinger in 2005, apparently, and many had foreseen this conclave would come down to a contest between the Italians and the faction that's long been wanting a non European. From the number of votes, it looks like the non-Europeans regrouped behind a single candidate fairly quickly, and pushed through. Bergoglio also has much in common with a bunch of the non European papabile like Ouellet and several of the more "morally" conservative US Cardinals.

But well... good news as far as I'm concerned. I can't be happier to have lost and dreaded a bit Ouellet being elected, though I told myself the local media must have exaggerated his chances. I don't care that much about any Pope, but I couldn't stand that bigot, homophobic misogynist and like a lot of people here was very happy when Ratzinger finally recalled him to Rome, but I feared how omnipresent he would be locally if elected. I've heard, seen and read all I ever wanted to know about the flyspeck village he was born in, that spent the last weeks whining on all tribunes about their fears they'd lose their quiet way of life if he got elected and how complicated to have all the international media in the 417 souls village, and that today are suddenly "very sad" he wasn't elected. :rolleyes:

I wonder if the Mayor's press conference will make it to YouTube; the English version read syllable by syllable was... epic. Poor guy.


Reply to message
It's the Zany Popetastic Sede Vacante Supergame! - 07/03/2013 06:00:53 PM 1226 Views
I will try my hand at it. - 07/03/2013 06:04:08 PM 858 Views
Well... I think there is a fair chance that I'll score 0 points. - 07/03/2013 07:39:54 PM 809 Views
There's a fair chance any of us will score 0 points. - 07/03/2013 09:47:49 PM 832 Views
That's gonna an epic fail - 07/03/2013 08:09:16 PM 1001 Views
Paul David Hewson, 1 April, Pope Bono I - 07/03/2013 09:54:50 PM 858 Views
Take your fake answer elsewhere if you're not going to play seriously. *NM* - 07/03/2013 11:48:57 PM 525 Views
*is chastened* That was the only remotely possible answer I could come up with w/o research. *MN* - 08/03/2013 04:13:44 AM 905 Views
So go do the research! It can't take as long to perform as one of your standard diatribes... *NM* - 08/03/2013 09:29:57 PM 463 Views
Tomorrow; I am running on fumes and trying to tell Demotic from demotic at the moment. - 08/03/2013 10:03:52 PM 964 Views
Re: It's the Zany Popetastic Sede Vacante Supergame! - 08/03/2013 12:06:51 AM 904 Views
I'll go with Cardinal Turkson, Benedict XVII, March 22nd - 08/03/2013 12:10:32 AM 897 Views
Re: It's the Zany Popetastic Sede Vacante Supergame! - 08/03/2013 02:21:51 AM 1071 Views
Eh, why not? - 08/03/2013 02:26:37 AM 1046 Views
Hugo Chavez *NM* - 08/03/2013 09:46:22 AM 533 Views
Re: It's the Zany Popetastic Sede Vacante Supergame! - 08/03/2013 03:17:22 PM 780 Views
White Smoke *NM* - 13/03/2013 06:43:56 PM 483 Views
Congratulations! We have all tied with 0 points out of a possible 200. - 13/03/2013 07:27:24 PM 998 Views
Victory - 13/03/2013 07:40:03 PM 916 Views
Or Lando. - 13/03/2013 08:56:11 PM 1176 Views
I am very particular about my Landos. *NM* - 13/03/2013 09:59:44 PM 516 Views
I was shocked it happened so soon. - 13/03/2013 07:46:08 PM 930 Views
Us and most Vaticanists it appears - 13/03/2013 11:49:29 PM 962 Views
Pope Suburban (the First) - 14/03/2013 02:09:44 AM 842 Views
I love that you guessed after it happened and still got it wrong - 14/03/2013 02:18:53 PM 841 Views
so sue me! - 16/03/2013 06:31:40 PM 947 Views
I had the feeling it was going to be one of the Latin Americans - 14/03/2013 06:16:10 PM 804 Views

Reply to Message