Active Users:382 Time:26/04/2025 09:57:44 PM
You just don't get it, or apparently are so in love with your political ideology you won't. HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 04/03/2013 04:58:15 AM

Social Security was NEVER sustainable. The sustainability of the program when it was presented was an illusion. Its sustainability was based on the US population increasing WITHOUT END. This is a complete physical impossibility, not to mention contrary to all the recorded history of advancing civilizations. It is not now, nor was it ever, a perpetually sustainable program, BECAUSE it is structured as a Ponzi. As long as there is no capital investment and growth, it can not survive, PERIOD. It is simple math (though with VERY big numbers).

A secondary argument against the program is that it is a VERY bad program (just how bad it is becomes hidden behind those same really big numbers). For every person you can point to and say "see it helped this person" or "It kept that person out of poverty" I can point to that same person and run the numbers for them and show you how much money they COULD HAVE HAD instead with a real investment plan. It is a very basic time/value of money calculation.

With the exception of a few first generation SS retiree recipients everyone else for the last 65 years has been hosed.

Reply to message
Can You Name the Largest US Program to ANNUALLY Collect More Than It Spent for 75 Straight Years? - 28/02/2013 11:03:18 PM 1381 Views
It's the world's greatest Ponzi scheme, since the government forces us to give money to it. - 01/03/2013 01:05:05 PM 816 Views
Yes, "government forcing people to give money" defines a Ponzi; speeding tickets are Ponzis. - 01/03/2013 03:53:02 PM 907 Views
Good lord my friend..... - 02/03/2013 04:19:35 AM 850 Views
I will just link what Isaac said; maybe then you will pay attention to it. - 02/03/2013 04:56:34 AM 896 Views
I really think you terribly misread what I said *NM* - 02/03/2013 06:59:56 AM 464 Views
Yes he did. He has very poor reading comprehension skills. *NM* - 03/03/2013 01:07:59 AM 485 Views
I really do not think I did. - 04/03/2013 01:43:02 AM 930 Views
I'm pretty confident you have - 04/03/2013 11:49:19 AM 913 Views
We evidently disagree on what constitutes a Ponzi scheme. - 11/03/2013 09:56:27 PM 842 Views
No, I agree with a clear definiton, you seem not to want to absorb that - 11/03/2013 10:24:47 PM 1001 Views
It is neither an investment nor fraudulent. - 12/03/2013 02:34:09 AM 1063 Views
Okay, that's a really weird or naive standard to judge SS by - 01/03/2013 05:25:11 PM 868 Views
Great; will you put that on a postcard to Cannoli, A2K, Rick Perry and the rest of your party? - 01/03/2013 07:39:44 PM 886 Views
Your attacks on republican ideals would have more credit if you understood them - 02/03/2013 04:27:34 AM 874 Views
An ironic charge, since their defenses of those ideals typically suffer from the same defect. - 02/03/2013 04:51:32 AM 854 Views
I'm rubber you're glue, whatever you say bounces of me and sticks to you. nyah, nyah, nyah - 02/03/2013 12:58:10 PM 792 Views
"Unsustainable"=/="meeting monthly obligations for 75 YEARS and still having $2.5 trillion left." - 04/03/2013 01:03:09 AM 905 Views
Please look up the definition of sustainable. Hint: "its worked so far" isn't it. - 04/03/2013 04:25:19 AM 879 Views
"As it is currently constructed/funded" is one HELL of a qualifier. - 04/03/2013 04:41:30 AM 941 Views
You just don't get it, or apparently are so in love with your political ideology you won't. - 04/03/2013 04:58:15 AM 736 Views
I believe if you check civilizations record you will find the human population has steadily risen. - 04/03/2013 05:08:38 AM 815 Views
*sigh* - 04/03/2013 12:15:22 PM 813 Views
Birth RATES have fallen; POPULATION steadily rose in every period except the Black Deaths peak. - 11/03/2013 09:56:36 PM 1096 Views
Re: Declining birth rates are the key - 13/03/2013 04:47:41 PM 911 Views
Ironic that you would make my point while arguing against - 04/03/2013 06:12:29 PM 754 Views
? - 11/03/2013 09:56:59 PM 919 Views
aH yes the great liberal investmetn/retirement plan that offers me a NEGATIGVE rate of return... - 02/03/2013 11:51:50 AM 788 Views
Do you sincerely believe people earning $14,560/year can afford investing 4% of it? - 04/03/2013 12:53:30 AM 950 Views
*sigh* - 04/03/2013 03:43:08 AM 785 Views
I tried it with compound interest; $44.80/month at 4% for 50 years still does not get to $1.25 mill. - 04/03/2013 04:24:51 AM 858 Views
Here are some clues. - 04/03/2013 04:37:39 AM 733 Views
It is math, not the Riddle of the Sphinx: EIther it adds up or does not. - 04/03/2013 05:02:39 AM 872 Views
Math is simple - Either you know how to calculate it or you don't - 04/03/2013 11:55:24 AM 960 Views
Indeed. - 11/03/2013 09:53:59 PM 874 Views
Re: Indeed. - 13/03/2013 05:00:10 PM 1020 Views
SS is supposed to supplement a proper pension, not provide your sole income after retirement - 05/03/2013 03:53:03 AM 746 Views
Did you bother to actually read anything? - 05/03/2013 02:32:16 PM 810 Views
do *YOU* know what "living in poverty" means? - 05/03/2013 05:49:14 PM 874 Views
Re: do *YOU* know what "living in poverty" means? --- yeah, I've BEEN there. - 05/03/2013 08:01:33 PM 844 Views
how about respond to a post with logic and civility instead of being a troll for once? - 05/03/2013 11:03:00 PM 955 Views
All I have used is civility and logic, or least as much civility as was warrented. - 06/03/2013 04:28:04 AM 888 Views
yeah, it's my fault for stooping to your level.... - 08/03/2013 07:22:24 PM 926 Views
Re: yeah, it's my fault for stooping to your level.... - 10/03/2013 01:42:26 PM 806 Views
i'm not going to keep going in circles so i will finish with this.... - 11/03/2013 10:08:53 PM 1112 Views
No loss. - 13/03/2013 04:37:41 PM 743 Views
"Rah! Rah! Rah!" Can we please cut out all this blather and bile? - 05/03/2013 11:53:41 PM 817 Views
spoken like a true enemy of the state! - 06/03/2013 12:54:38 AM 785 Views
Re: spoken like a true enemy of the state! - 08/03/2013 03:04:37 PM 835 Views
I was not trolling, but clarifying. - 11/03/2013 09:53:48 PM 873 Views

Reply to Message