"As it is currently constructed/funded" is one HELL of a qualifier.
Joel Send a noteboard - 04/03/2013 04:41:30 AM
View original postSocial security began with a 7:1 of workers to retirees and has steadily fallen ever since. As it is currently constructed/funded it is completely unsustainable. Yeah it has lasted 75 years, and can definitely make it another 25, probably close to 50, but not any further without completely restructuring it. My generation has the "honor" of being the first to loose money one it and it is only going to go further downhill, faster, from now on. I get the fact that you don't understand the math, blame your local school system for that deficiency. You can either break out a basic math textbook (paying particular attention to the chapter on compound interest) or believe someone who does understand it.
I never said it does not need restructing, just the opposite, actually, partly for the reasons you state. There is a REASON the retiree:worker ratio has fallen so sharply: Because US life expectancy has RISEN so sharply. I am not saying we must or should raise retirement age all the way to 78, but c'mon, life expectancy went up 13 years and retirement age only went up 2 (and even THAT increase will not be completely phased in until 2027)? Of course that is a mathematical nightmare. HOWEVER, that does NOT mean
View original postSocial Security was a bad plan when it was proposed & implemented. It is a worse plan today, and in the future it will simply be legalized theft.
You made a HUGE logical leap, from "SS can no longer work the way it has since creation 75 years to go" to "SS never could, never did and never will work." It is the difference between saying, "my car needs a new transmission" and "cars cannot move."
View original postIt is so bad that I would gladly sign away any right to the money that has been taken from me thus far, and any call I could have on any of the social safety nets in the future if they would just let me out of it. Give me that 15% to save on my own and Uncle Sam will never need worry about me again. Hell, just give me 7.5, and I'll let them have the other half. In 22 years I could retire and have about the same monthly income that I receive now from just responsibly investing that 7.5% instead of giving it to the government hoping that they will protect me.
Yes, but you would gladly do that whether or not SS were sustainable on the current on any basis, and we both know it. You are not saying, "Unless we change its structure so it is solvent again I want out," but simply, "I want out." So write your Congressman, but do not hold your breath, because most of the country is not willing to give Worldcom and Bear-Stearns their retirement money, even those who have it to give.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Can You Name the Largest US Program to ANNUALLY Collect More Than It Spent for 75 Straight Years?
- 28/02/2013 11:03:18 PM
1370 Views
Medicare? *NM*
- 28/02/2013 11:38:22 PM
548 Views
No, Medicare has only been around about half as long.
- 28/02/2013 11:56:32 PM
858 Views
Medicare has its own problems, and caused many more. You really do not want to have this debate.
- 03/03/2013 03:03:15 PM
794 Views
No, I do not, because Medicare and torts are invariably scapegoated for all problems with healthcare
- 04/03/2013 12:52:37 AM
848 Views
I can argue with anyone on this (and have) btut first we need to break out that dictionary
- 04/03/2013 04:45:06 AM
772 Views
I am sure you can and have; ability to form arguments does not automatically grant them validity.
- 11/03/2013 09:56:11 PM
836 Views
Like I said, short conversation, once everyone uses the same definitions.
- 13/03/2013 03:28:52 PM
841 Views
From the way you're shitting yourself with glee, I'm going to say Social Security.
- 01/03/2013 12:45:50 AM
967 Views
Also unlike Ponzis, Social Security was not meant to profit—it just did anyway. For 75 years.
- 01/03/2013 01:55:46 AM
811 Views
It is a "Ponzi" by definition, any argument to the contrary just makes you look ignorant.
- 02/03/2013 12:02:46 PM
876 Views
Wait: An insurer is saying insurance is a Ponzi scheme? 
- 04/03/2013 12:56:30 AM
839 Views
- 04/03/2013 12:56:30 AM
839 Views
You are making even lese sense than usual... Quite an acomplishment. *NM*
- 04/03/2013 03:31:39 AM
511 Views
Maybe, but my math usually checks, and I never have to explain what I omitted.
- 11/03/2013 09:55:50 PM
928 Views
My math ALWAYS "checks" - it isn't personal, you are just making absolutely no sense, *NM*
- 13/03/2013 03:27:11 PM
452 Views
It's the world's greatest Ponzi scheme, since the government forces us to give money to it.
- 01/03/2013 01:05:05 PM
803 Views
Yes, "government forcing people to give money" defines a Ponzi; speeding tickets are Ponzis. 
- 01/03/2013 03:53:02 PM
895 Views
- 01/03/2013 03:53:02 PM
895 Views
Good lord my friend.....
- 02/03/2013 04:19:35 AM
838 Views
I will just link what Isaac said; maybe then you will pay attention to it.
- 02/03/2013 04:56:34 AM
883 Views
I really think you terribly misread what I said *NM*
- 02/03/2013 06:59:56 AM
458 Views
I really do not think I did.
- 04/03/2013 01:43:02 AM
916 Views
I'm pretty confident you have
- 04/03/2013 11:49:19 AM
900 Views
We evidently disagree on what constitutes a Ponzi scheme.
- 11/03/2013 09:56:27 PM
825 Views
No, I agree with a clear definiton, you seem not to want to absorb that
- 11/03/2013 10:24:47 PM
979 Views
Re: Yes, "government forcing people to give money" defines a Ponzi; speeding tickets are Ponzis.
- 02/03/2013 12:22:34 PM
894 Views
- 02/03/2013 12:22:34 PM
894 Views
Fraud="money contributed is NOT invested for the contributor, but instead redistributed to others"?
- 04/03/2013 12:51:30 AM
831 Views
You can try and misrepresent what I have said all you want, you are still wrong.
- 04/03/2013 03:45:24 AM
903 Views
Dude, how is QUOTING you misrepresenting you?! And why must I ALWAYS ask that in these threads?
- 11/03/2013 09:56:18 PM
869 Views
- 11/03/2013 09:56:18 PM
869 Views
Okay, that's a really weird or naive standard to judge SS by
- 01/03/2013 05:25:11 PM
848 Views
Great; will you put that on a postcard to Cannoli, A2K, Rick Perry and the rest of your party? 
- 01/03/2013 07:39:44 PM
874 Views
- 01/03/2013 07:39:44 PM
874 Views
I don't think I'd be telling them anything they don't already know... I mostly agree with them
- 02/03/2013 05:38:56 AM
996 Views
Means testing is flat out WRONG, and the contribution limit is a sticky debate
- 02/03/2013 12:43:09 PM
805 Views
Tell that to him not me, I didn't express an opinion and my implied one obviously doesn't favor it
- 02/03/2013 05:28:14 PM
923 Views
I was, I just hit the repy under the wrong post. He was the first to bering the two topics up. *NM*
- 03/03/2013 04:09:34 AM
452 Views
It is insurance against old age poverty, not a longevity lottery.
- 04/03/2013 02:00:24 AM
902 Views
It is not insurance, it is a pension plan, that also contains an overpriced LT disability insurance.
- 04/03/2013 04:00:42 AM
908 Views
Social Security Insurance; says so right on the label.
- 11/03/2013 09:53:33 PM
1047 Views
You can call it BedroomWindowVitamins but it does not change what it acutally IS.
- 13/03/2013 04:34:42 PM
817 Views
"Sustainable"=/="profitable;" bankruptcy was not always a given, as your fellows claim..
- 04/03/2013 01:35:04 AM
808 Views
Sustainable often means profitable, they are not universally synonmous but both at once is ideal
- 04/03/2013 12:25:45 PM
796 Views
That is the IDEAL, but NOT point: Sustainability needs no profit, yet profit ensures sustainability.
- 11/03/2013 09:56:48 PM
1267 Views
Your attacks on republican ideals would have more credit if you understood them
- 02/03/2013 04:27:34 AM
860 Views
An ironic charge, since their defenses of those ideals typically suffer from the same defect.
- 02/03/2013 04:51:32 AM
840 Views
- 02/03/2013 04:51:32 AM
840 Views
I'm rubber you're glue, whatever you say bounces of me and sticks to you. nyah, nyah, nyah
- 02/03/2013 12:58:10 PM
776 Views
"Unsustainable"=/="meeting monthly obligations for 75 YEARS and still having $2.5 trillion left."
- 04/03/2013 01:03:09 AM
896 Views
Please look up the definition of sustainable. Hint: "its worked so far" isn't it.
- 04/03/2013 04:25:19 AM
865 Views
"As it is currently constructed/funded" is one HELL of a qualifier.
- 04/03/2013 04:41:30 AM
926 Views
You just don't get it, or apparently are so in love with your political ideology you won't.
- 04/03/2013 04:58:15 AM
725 Views
I believe if you check civilizations record you will find the human population has steadily risen.
- 04/03/2013 05:08:38 AM
802 Views
*sigh*
- 04/03/2013 12:15:22 PM
795 Views
Birth RATES have fallen; POPULATION steadily rose in every period except the Black Deaths peak.
- 11/03/2013 09:56:36 PM
1070 Views
Ironic that you would make my point while arguing against
- 04/03/2013 06:12:29 PM
740 Views
?
- 11/03/2013 09:56:59 PM
906 Views
you mistate his posistion and then rationalize that you know what he really meant
- 13/03/2013 12:06:44 PM
753 Views
aH yes the great liberal investmetn/retirement plan that offers me a NEGATIGVE rate of return...
- 02/03/2013 11:51:50 AM
777 Views
Do you sincerely believe people earning $14,560/year can afford investing 4% of it?
- 04/03/2013 12:53:30 AM
935 Views
*sigh*
- 04/03/2013 03:43:08 AM
773 Views
I tried it with compound interest; $44.80/month at 4% for 50 years still does not get to $1.25 mill.
- 04/03/2013 04:24:51 AM
844 Views
Here are some clues.
- 04/03/2013 04:37:39 AM
721 Views
It is math, not the Riddle of the Sphinx: EIther it adds up or does not.
- 04/03/2013 05:02:39 AM
857 Views
Math is simple - Either you know how to calculate it or you don't
- 04/03/2013 11:55:24 AM
943 Views
SS is supposed to supplement a proper pension, not provide your sole income after retirement
- 05/03/2013 03:53:03 AM
727 Views
Did you bother to actually read anything?
- 05/03/2013 02:32:16 PM
793 Views
do *YOU* know what "living in poverty" means?
- 05/03/2013 05:49:14 PM
861 Views
Re: do *YOU* know what "living in poverty" means? --- yeah, I've BEEN there.
- 05/03/2013 08:01:33 PM
829 Views
how about respond to a post with logic and civility instead of being a troll for once?
- 05/03/2013 11:03:00 PM
933 Views
All I have used is civility and logic, or least as much civility as was warrented.
- 06/03/2013 04:28:04 AM
867 Views
yeah, it's my fault for stooping to your level....
- 08/03/2013 07:22:24 PM
914 Views
Re: yeah, it's my fault for stooping to your level....
- 10/03/2013 01:42:26 PM
791 Views
i'm not going to keep going in circles so i will finish with this....
- 11/03/2013 10:08:53 PM
1099 Views
"Rah! Rah! Rah!" Can we please cut out all this blather and bile?
- 05/03/2013 11:53:41 PM
804 Views