Active Users:2562 Time:22/01/2025 10:44:50 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Pretty sure putting it in the dirt would increase atmospheric levels, though. EDIT: Never mind. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 22/02/2013 12:40:38 AM
EDIT: I looked it up, and apparently it's very stable. Neat idea.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

This message last edited by Ghavrel on 22/02/2013 at 12:41:37 AM
Reply to message
Coal - One of the Cleanest Energy Sources in the World! Anonymous2000 - 20/02/2013 09:41:02 PM 1125 Views
This could mean great news for me personally Timthetrolloc - 20/02/2013 09:50:39 PM 802 Views
I wonder if it could work on other fuels? Isaac - 20/02/2013 10:18:08 PM 817 Views
Uh, not quite... HyogaRott - 21/02/2013 02:45:03 AM 689 Views
Do we also need our oceans to be 30% more acidic? *NM* Roland00 - 21/02/2013 03:40:19 AM 452 Views
But the CO2 levels in our atmosphere are 20% higher than 50 years ago Floffe - 21/02/2013 08:49:29 AM 906 Views
There's a certain irony to being criticized on this one from that sector Isaac - 21/02/2013 05:37:37 PM 882 Views
aplogies HyogaRott - 21/02/2013 09:58:46 PM 745 Views
No problem *NM* Isaac - 21/02/2013 10:47:10 PM 345 Views
It seems pretty dubious. It still produces CO2. Ghavrel - 21/02/2013 10:02:55 AM 699 Views
i can think of three uses for excess CO2 moondog - 21/02/2013 03:16:42 PM 784 Views
Every single one of those increases atmospheric carbon. Ghavrel - 22/02/2013 12:39:00 AM 712 Views
The technology is still a big improvement over current methods. Aemon - 21/02/2013 05:01:31 PM 713 Views
Oh, I agree. My point is just that sequestration will remain an issue. *NM* Ghavrel - 22/02/2013 12:39:25 AM 331 Views
Well dense CO2 is easier to get rid of Isaac - 21/02/2013 06:08:33 PM 674 Views
Pretty sure putting it in the dirt would increase atmospheric levels, though. EDIT: Never mind. Ghavrel - 22/02/2013 12:40:38 AM 704 Views
Interesting. Bergioyn - 21/02/2013 09:57:27 AM 689 Views
Probably too little, too late. Dannymac - 21/02/2013 04:09:45 PM 783 Views
The excessive regulation is on coal use, not production. HyogaRott - 21/02/2013 05:00:28 PM 726 Views
Nope. Dannymac - 25/02/2013 05:26:39 AM 678 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes