Every single one of those increases atmospheric carbon.
Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 22/02/2013 12:39:00 AM
The carbon in coal is locked beneath the ground. When we bring it up and burn it, the CO2 that is generated is now added to the atmosphere. Even if you inject it into plants, when those plants die and decay the levels of CO2 will go up.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
Coal - One of the Cleanest Energy Sources in the World!
- 20/02/2013 09:41:02 PM
1183 Views
I wonder if it could work on other fuels?
- 20/02/2013 10:18:08 PM
870 Views
Uh, not quite...
- 21/02/2013 02:45:03 AM
735 Views
But the CO2 levels in our atmosphere are 20% higher than 50 years ago
- 21/02/2013 08:49:29 AM
956 Views
There's a certain irony to being criticized on this one from that sector
- 21/02/2013 05:37:37 PM
926 Views
It seems pretty dubious. It still produces CO2.
- 21/02/2013 10:02:55 AM
742 Views
i can think of three uses for excess CO2
- 21/02/2013 03:16:42 PM
838 Views
Every single one of those increases atmospheric carbon.
- 22/02/2013 12:39:00 AM
765 Views
The technology is still a big improvement over current methods.
- 21/02/2013 05:01:31 PM
764 Views
Oh, I agree. My point is just that sequestration will remain an issue. *NM*
- 22/02/2013 12:39:25 AM
354 Views
Well dense CO2 is easier to get rid of
- 21/02/2013 06:08:33 PM
722 Views
Pretty sure putting it in the dirt would increase atmospheric levels, though. EDIT: Never mind.
- 22/02/2013 12:40:38 AM
750 Views
Probably too little, too late.
- 21/02/2013 04:09:45 PM
832 Views