Active Users:358 Time:27/04/2025 09:54:14 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
The technology is still a big improvement over current methods. Aemon Send a noteboard - 21/02/2013 05:01:31 PM
We already do a lot of carbon capture / sequestration (generally it's put into big underground reservoirs), so this technology doesn't introduce a new problem. Obviously we can't shove tons of CO2 underground forever, but if we're going to do it in the short term, it's still better to do so cheaply and efficiently. And I mean really, all this has to do is get us by until fusion power becomes economical, and that shouldn't be too difficult. After all, fusion is only 20 years away. ;)
Reply to message
Coal - One of the Cleanest Energy Sources in the World! Anonymous2000 - 20/02/2013 09:41:02 PM 1183 Views
This could mean great news for me personally Timthetrolloc - 20/02/2013 09:50:39 PM 851 Views
I wonder if it could work on other fuels? Isaac - 20/02/2013 10:18:08 PM 870 Views
Uh, not quite... HyogaRott - 21/02/2013 02:45:03 AM 736 Views
Do we also need our oceans to be 30% more acidic? *NM* Roland00 - 21/02/2013 03:40:19 AM 473 Views
But the CO2 levels in our atmosphere are 20% higher than 50 years ago Floffe - 21/02/2013 08:49:29 AM 956 Views
There's a certain irony to being criticized on this one from that sector Isaac - 21/02/2013 05:37:37 PM 926 Views
aplogies HyogaRott - 21/02/2013 09:58:46 PM 792 Views
No problem *NM* Isaac - 21/02/2013 10:47:10 PM 365 Views
It seems pretty dubious. It still produces CO2. Ghavrel - 21/02/2013 10:02:55 AM 742 Views
i can think of three uses for excess CO2 moondog - 21/02/2013 03:16:42 PM 838 Views
Every single one of those increases atmospheric carbon. Ghavrel - 22/02/2013 12:39:00 AM 765 Views
The technology is still a big improvement over current methods. Aemon - 21/02/2013 05:01:31 PM 765 Views
Oh, I agree. My point is just that sequestration will remain an issue. *NM* Ghavrel - 22/02/2013 12:39:25 AM 354 Views
Well dense CO2 is easier to get rid of Isaac - 21/02/2013 06:08:33 PM 722 Views
Pretty sure putting it in the dirt would increase atmospheric levels, though. EDIT: Never mind. Ghavrel - 22/02/2013 12:40:38 AM 751 Views
Interesting. Bergioyn - 21/02/2013 09:57:27 AM 739 Views
Probably too little, too late. Dannymac - 21/02/2013 04:09:45 PM 832 Views
The excessive regulation is on coal use, not production. HyogaRott - 21/02/2013 05:00:28 PM 771 Views
Nope. Dannymac - 25/02/2013 05:26:39 AM 729 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes