In a general sense I see this as the state protecting the rights of the individual...
Stephen Send a noteboard - 01/02/2013 07:35:05 PM
Specifically to not be harmed by giving a ridiculous name.
In this particular instance though I think its stupid. It's one thing to prevent parents from naming their kid Football or Track, and another to stop a relatively innocuous thing like Breeze or its Icelandic equivalent Blaer.
In this particular instance though I think its stupid. It's one thing to prevent parents from naming their kid Football or Track, and another to stop a relatively innocuous thing like Breeze or its Icelandic equivalent Blaer.
"I mean, if everyone had a soul, there would be no contrast by which we could appreciate it. For giving us this perspective, we thank you." - Nate
Ok. I thought living in America with the rise of the Federal Gov't was leading towards ...
- 01/02/2013 08:38:46 AM
813 Views
I think it's okay for a law to protect children from stupid parents
- 01/02/2013 09:26:53 AM
489 Views
As libertarian as I am in most things, I agree with you.
- 01/02/2013 02:26:21 PM
496 Views
Then you are not a libertarian *NM*
- 01/02/2013 02:44:14 PM
262 Views
In a general sense I see this as the state protecting the rights of the individual...
- 01/02/2013 07:35:05 PM
470 Views
I don't give a flying fuck what you think. *NM*
- 02/02/2013 05:14:45 PM
242 Views
I wonder why you haven't slit your wrists yet, with the vehemence of your posts lately
- 02/02/2013 09:05:07 PM
477 Views
if your parents are that stupid a bad names is the least of your problems *NM*
- 02/02/2013 04:27:43 PM
314 Views
I wouldn't give gov'ts a blank check on this but conceptually it isn't that bad
- 01/02/2013 04:59:28 PM
497 Views
Names can be like art. People have different opinions about their quality.
- 02/02/2013 03:52:25 PM
460 Views
But in this case the child, a minor, has no control over the name.
- 02/02/2013 05:19:35 PM
435 Views