The Civil Rights laws of the 50s & 60s only affected 10% of the population. Why did we need them?
Cannoli Send a noteboard - 29/01/2013 11:53:08 PM
Two of the four questions Snyder took after speaking Friday, Jan. 25, at a luncheon in Amway Grand Plaza Hotel dealt with the controversial bill that the Republican-led state Legislature passed in lame-duck session last month. The gist of his responses: Michiganders aren’t going to be working union jobs anyway, so stop making right to work a divisive, political issue.
“Over 90 percent of the jobs that you’re looking at aren’t going to be in a situation where right to work is even relevant," Snyder said in the hotel’s Ambassador Ballroom.
“Over 90 percent of the jobs that you’re looking at aren’t going to be in a situation where right to work is even relevant," Snyder said in the hotel’s Ambassador Ballroom.
isn't it great to know that the law republicans rammed through with minimal discussion only affects 10% of the workforce population? even though they claimed they needed the law to compete on a national level with other states, and that it would help the state economy, the governor and other republicans finally admit that it really only affects a small minority of jobs in the state. if that's the case, why did it need to be passed? you typically don't pass laws to deal with something that only affects 10% of the population so adversely unless it's a matter of public safety and/or protection. neither of which are applicable in this case, as far as i can tell.
The flip side of your complaint is to wonder why you are pissing and moaning about this law. The only people hurt by a right to work law are the union parasites (i.e. bosses and staff) who make their money off of union dues and thus have a vested interests in forcing workers to join unions. The right to work laws allow workers to decide for themselves if they think the benefits of unionism outweigh the costs. The majority of your complaints on this particular case have been procedural ones, which is hypocrisy of the highest order coming from a union supporter, given the traditional levels of political corruption in which unions have been known to engage.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
michigan governor admits "right to work" law was not necessary
- 29/01/2013 11:12:20 PM
512 Views
The Civil Rights laws of the 50s & 60s only affected 10% of the population. Why did we need them?
- 29/01/2013 11:53:08 PM
263 Views
probably because the Constitution demanded it. that pesky equality thing applies equally to all....
- 30/01/2013 12:08:58 AM
241 Views
I really have not seen anyone so stupid on these boards in a long time. You reason like a union thug
- 03/02/2013 12:03:31 AM
386 Views
Right to Work laws are very important.....
- 30/01/2013 12:29:29 AM
249 Views
*NM*
Modern unions are morally corrupt and antique, don't pretend you disagree
- 30/01/2013 02:38:39 AM
239 Views
legislating their ability to exist does nothing to address this problem.... *NM*
- 30/01/2013 03:05:09 AM
110 Views
then it is good thing that isn't what they did. Kind of like what you quoted isn't what was said
- 30/01/2013 04:32:40 AM
229 Views
Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't realize they banned unions. Oh wait, THEY DIDN'T.
- 30/01/2013 05:29:50 AM
236 Views
Again the GOP "fixes" programs with problems like vets "fix" horses with broken legs.
- 02/02/2013 07:50:10 PM
355 Views