Public or private.
Because either way, the system does need work.
Because either way, the system does need work.
I think the health insurance industry is being unfairly pinned as the bad guy in this whole situation though. I think the real roots of our country's health care problems tend to come from several sources.
One, the people: The frivolous law suits for malpractice and other types of tort are a major drain on the health care system and result in dramatically higher health care costs across the board. Between the cost of malpractice insurance, and the amount of money spent on settlements in the various lawsuits against the health care industry, it becomes nearly impossible for them to charge any less than they currently do for health care.
Two, pharmaceutical companies. The absurd amounts of money that they are permitted to charge for their drugs is crippling to insurance companies and people alike. This issue is one that is much more difficult to solve in my mind, because in all honesty many of the advances made in health care are made by these companies, and they are able to make these advances because they make so much money off of their overpriced pills. Cut their profits on the prescriptions, and you cut how much money they have to spend on research, and eventually slow down the pace of innovation in the health care industry. I think more oversight in the industry, a shorter period of exclusivity on the drugs, and control of advertising could help dramatically, but may not be enough.
I won't say that the insurance companies are without fault, and that they don't participate in some unsavory practices. What I will say about that though, is that the oversight in that industry is considerably more strict than it is for pharmaceutical companies, or lawsuits. Much of what they do is forced upon them by the incredibly high prices of health care. If costs were controlled more effectively, then cost of insurance, and the numbers of people that the companies are able to extend coverage to would dramatically increase. The way the system works right now, the companies are forced to be extremely exclusionary in their practices just to make sure they are able to make a profit. Their profit margins are too slim to be able to extend coverage to more people than they already do. Fix the other problems, and provide a little more oversight to the insurance industry, and I think that the entire health care situation will dramatically improve.
Senate Finance Committee Votes Against Government-Run Health Insurance Plan
29/09/2009 09:08:40 PM
- 763 Views
I just hope this doesn't squash all health-care reform attempts
29/09/2009 09:12:15 PM
- 486 Views
It definitely needs work, but not scrapped.....
29/09/2009 09:16:32 PM
- 491 Views
Opinion polls with health care have huge swings depending on how it's phrased
29/09/2009 09:28:28 PM
- 560 Views
Polls are horrid evidence in my mind
29/09/2009 09:32:58 PM
- 489 Views
Re: Polls are horrid evidence in my mind
29/09/2009 10:12:26 PM
- 656 Views
Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
29/09/2009 10:29:13 PM
- 443 Views
Re: Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
29/09/2009 11:21:21 PM
- 542 Views
Re: Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
29/09/2009 11:40:42 PM
- 550 Views
his statements on health care are precisely my point, but much more well stated. *NM*
29/09/2009 11:54:29 PM
- 205 Views
Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO
29/09/2009 11:44:58 PM
- 540 Views
Re: Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO
30/09/2009 12:28:36 AM
- 522 Views
that the private sector has a long history of abusing both customer and employee *NM*
30/09/2009 03:46:03 AM
- 199 Views
That's indisbutable
30/09/2009 05:55:45 PM
- 511 Views
It doesn't work at all
30/09/2009 04:27:44 AM
- 549 Views
i have yet to see any evidence of malpractice insurance being a driving cost of health care
30/09/2009 05:27:34 AM
- 558 Views
When the malpractice insurance can cost well over $100k a year of course it effects the costs.
30/09/2009 06:21:29 AM
- 537 Views
it's not THAT they pay malpractice
30/09/2009 02:00:04 PM
- 420 Views
but doctors are *required* to buy malpractice insurance
30/09/2009 04:13:08 PM
- 469 Views
that's completely moot to the situation malpractice insurance causes.
30/09/2009 04:21:42 PM
- 437 Views
hooray, we're going to continue in mediocrity when it comes to our health
29/09/2009 10:15:00 PM
- 549 Views
That is a decade old and horribly discredited citation
29/09/2009 11:46:51 PM
- 629 Views
regardless, we still spend a lot more on health care while having too many uncovered people
29/09/2009 11:56:24 PM
- 460 Views
My objection, in this context, is strictly about references
30/09/2009 12:13:40 AM
- 467 Views
i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 12:54:25 AM
- 510 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 01:15:30 AM
- 568 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 12:24:45 PM
- 556 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 06:29:09 PM
- 544 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 10:57:36 PM
- 525 Views
Interesting...
01/10/2009 12:09:35 AM
- 459 Views
Hooray! The government isn't going to get directly involved and make HC even worse! *NM*
30/09/2009 01:03:50 AM
- 200 Views