Re: Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO
Isaac Send a noteboard - 30/09/2009 12:28:36 AM
I did NOT anywhere near claim that ALL the Private Sector is corrupt. I also did NOT deny that the government was free of corruption and infact made it a point to say I was not saying that. But do I really have to throw a textbook at you to show that what I said still holds true throughout time? I would sincerely appreciate if you don't put words in my mouth and jump to extreme conclusions based on half of what I say. Of course if you did THAT you'd hardly be yourself, would you?
I am ONLY saying that I do not feel comfortable with the private sector running wild with no legal accountability with something as important and crucial to health as health insurance.
Or are you really going to make the leap that all government law and regulation is bad as well?
I am ONLY saying that I do not feel comfortable with the private sector running wild with no legal accountability with something as important and crucial to health as health insurance.
Or are you really going to make the leap that all government law and regulation is bad as well?
You are now putting words in my mouth, ironically. If you feel I did so, then that wasn't my intent. There is absolutely a place for government regulation in healtcare and insurance.If nothing else, we want no monopolies or cartels.
Please keep in mind that I am a blunt spoken person, if I put a question mark at the end of a sentence, it's a question, not an inference or an attempt to put words in your mouth. In all fairness, the one question mark was not a question, it was a statement on absurdity, I don't assume by any means you think politicians are shining beacons of decency and honor. Since 99% of the population would fall on the floor laughing at hearing someone say so with a straightface, I took as a given you were part of that 99%... I assume the other 1% is in fact deaf, and therefore couldn't hear the statement. I should probably start putting more emoticons in my replies so people know when I am being sarcastic.
You will have to clarify for me though, which particular thing you said "holds true through all time", I missed that, sorry, phones ringing off the hook and emails beeping so I wouldn't be surprised if I read right passed it.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Senate Finance Committee Votes Against Government-Run Health Insurance Plan
29/09/2009 09:08:40 PM
- 763 Views
I just hope this doesn't squash all health-care reform attempts
29/09/2009 09:12:15 PM
- 486 Views
It definitely needs work, but not scrapped.....
29/09/2009 09:16:32 PM
- 491 Views
Opinion polls with health care have huge swings depending on how it's phrased
29/09/2009 09:28:28 PM
- 560 Views
Polls are horrid evidence in my mind
29/09/2009 09:32:58 PM
- 488 Views
Re: Polls are horrid evidence in my mind
29/09/2009 10:12:26 PM
- 655 Views
Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
29/09/2009 10:29:13 PM
- 443 Views
Re: Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
29/09/2009 11:21:21 PM
- 541 Views
Re: Not that I totally disagree with you, but that being said
29/09/2009 11:40:42 PM
- 549 Views
his statements on health care are precisely my point, but much more well stated. *NM*
29/09/2009 11:54:29 PM
- 204 Views
Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO
29/09/2009 11:44:58 PM
- 540 Views
Re: Difference is that the law is subject to more checks and balances than the whims of a CEO
30/09/2009 12:28:36 AM
- 522 Views
that the private sector has a long history of abusing both customer and employee *NM*
30/09/2009 03:46:03 AM
- 198 Views
That's indisbutable
30/09/2009 05:55:45 PM
- 510 Views
It doesn't work at all
30/09/2009 04:27:44 AM
- 548 Views
i have yet to see any evidence of malpractice insurance being a driving cost of health care
30/09/2009 05:27:34 AM
- 557 Views
When the malpractice insurance can cost well over $100k a year of course it effects the costs.
30/09/2009 06:21:29 AM
- 536 Views
it's not THAT they pay malpractice
30/09/2009 02:00:04 PM
- 420 Views
but doctors are *required* to buy malpractice insurance
30/09/2009 04:13:08 PM
- 469 Views
that's completely moot to the situation malpractice insurance causes.
30/09/2009 04:21:42 PM
- 436 Views
hooray, we're going to continue in mediocrity when it comes to our health
29/09/2009 10:15:00 PM
- 548 Views
That is a decade old and horribly discredited citation
29/09/2009 11:46:51 PM
- 629 Views
regardless, we still spend a lot more on health care while having too many uncovered people
29/09/2009 11:56:24 PM
- 460 Views
My objection, in this context, is strictly about references
30/09/2009 12:13:40 AM
- 466 Views
i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 12:54:25 AM
- 510 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 01:15:30 AM
- 568 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 12:24:45 PM
- 554 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 06:29:09 PM
- 544 Views
Re: i understand your point about the reference
30/09/2009 10:57:36 PM
- 524 Views
Interesting...
01/10/2009 12:09:35 AM
- 459 Views
Hooray! The government isn't going to get directly involved and make HC even worse! *NM*
30/09/2009 01:03:50 AM
- 199 Views