Active Users:1124 Time:22/11/2024 09:48:23 AM
You do realize that resorting to personal attacks reveal an inability to make sound arguments? *NM* Helene Send a noteboard - 02/01/2013 06:01:33 PM
Reply to message
When guns are a big national issue, how do reporters & pundits not know facts about them? - 21/12/2012 05:33:14 PM 1538 Views
You don't hunt by walking into a classroom and shooting 20 deer - 21/12/2012 05:56:16 PM 991 Views
You're actually not right on that one - 21/12/2012 07:49:53 PM 919 Views
That wasn't the point I was making - 21/12/2012 09:49:40 PM 865 Views
You should probably clarify it then - 21/12/2012 10:47:26 PM 1021 Views
His post was perfectly clear. Yours seemed like a response to an entirely different post. - 21/12/2012 10:53:39 PM 1177 Views
Explain that remark, it is not obvious to me *NM* - 21/12/2012 11:00:10 PM 529 Views
I think - 21/12/2012 11:13:34 PM 852 Views
Thats' easy, there is simply no such thing as a 'hunting rifle' - 21/12/2012 11:17:41 PM 860 Views
I'd say the expert gunsmith - 21/12/2012 11:28:02 PM 906 Views
I thought I was being perfectly clear. - 21/12/2012 10:57:35 PM 870 Views
Re: I thought I was being perfectly clear. - 21/12/2012 11:25:04 PM 921 Views
Oh I wasn't commenting on the standard of people here - 21/12/2012 11:29:36 PM 841 Views
you're largely correct, which is why we need stronger laws on ownership not guns per se - 21/12/2012 09:39:14 PM 831 Views
I can't think of a better reason than self defense - 21/12/2012 10:33:26 PM 890 Views
He is right about Australia - 21/12/2012 10:46:27 PM 868 Views
No kidding - 21/12/2012 10:59:28 PM 855 Views
If you knew all that - 21/12/2012 11:02:38 PM 879 Views
I think you are on the right track, but to the wrong destination; "lethal weapon" is redundant. - 21/12/2012 11:05:29 PM 862 Views
My read is that the 2nd Amendment not only allows, but mandates, cop-killer bullets. - 22/12/2012 12:45:04 AM 902 Views
Does the Second Amendment protect the rights of felons and the mentally incompetent to have guns? - 22/12/2012 02:35:16 AM 1067 Views
Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands. - 22/12/2012 03:02:18 AM 795 Views
Re: Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands. - 22/12/2012 04:12:30 AM 853 Views
umm... - 22/12/2012 12:41:31 PM 767 Views
1997 North Hollywood Shootout - 22/12/2012 04:07:39 AM 931 Views
Laws against murder failed to prevent that, too; clearly they are ineffective and should be repealed - 22/12/2012 06:02:24 AM 985 Views
Such laws were never intended for prevention, they define actions that will be punished. *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:57:57 PM 560 Views
So do laws against getting a gun without screening, training and certification. - 23/12/2012 02:01:32 PM 806 Views
Then CHANGE the Constitution, don't ignore it. *NM* - 26/12/2012 03:12:11 PM 495 Views
I am not suggesting either changing or ignoring the Constitution. - 26/12/2012 04:01:02 PM 913 Views
Yes you are. - 26/12/2012 08:06:01 PM 715 Views
Learn logic, and stop needlessly trying to teach me grammar. - 26/12/2012 08:55:25 PM 877 Views
Lear to read, and I won't have to - 27/12/2012 04:28:59 PM 940 Views
You are wrong. - 22/12/2012 12:14:40 PM 890 Views
That explains much; I read somewhere Brits are averse to it. - 22/12/2012 01:17:15 PM 812 Views
We're also averse to being wrong. - 22/12/2012 02:53:49 PM 891 Views
So you say... - 22/12/2012 03:32:16 PM 812 Views
guns r stpid *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:39:30 AM 581 Views
What bemuses me about this thing with Adam Lanza, is that his mother had 5 registered guns - 23/12/2012 07:10:26 AM 908 Views
She was asleep with him in the house. - 23/12/2012 02:24:47 PM 881 Views
LOOK, look, there is another one... - 26/12/2012 03:13:45 PM 821 Views
I find the absolutist ant/pro-gun positions equally dangerous and absurd. - 26/12/2012 04:20:37 PM 796 Views
So we should just *kinda* ignore the Constitution *this* time... But what about NEXT time... - 26/12/2012 08:08:12 PM 782 Views
No, we should enact gun regulation the Constitution explicitly empowers. - 26/12/2012 09:02:12 PM 797 Views
Which would be... NONE. *NM* - 27/12/2012 04:31:53 PM 499 Views
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state...." - 28/12/2012 05:14:49 PM 790 Views
*see previous grammar lesson* *NM* - 28/12/2012 10:31:43 PM 484 Views
The instant it becomes relevant, I shall. - 28/12/2012 11:45:01 PM 984 Views
Your point being? - 27/12/2012 10:47:29 AM 779 Views
As a father, I would rather kill my own child than have him kill 26 other people. - 27/12/2012 04:35:02 PM 736 Views
And as a father, you are somehow clairvoyant? - 28/12/2012 07:43:08 AM 793 Views
Nice flippant unthinking reply, you and moondog should get together. *NM* - 28/12/2012 04:55:14 PM 541 Views
How is my reply flippant? Your statement was unthinking, not mine. - 29/12/2012 06:59:04 AM 832 Views
YOU asked if it would have been better for her to kill her own child instead, I answered. - 29/12/2012 03:52:02 PM 844 Views
I asked if a shoot out between mother and son had been better, not whether she should have killed - 29/12/2012 08:54:09 PM 775 Views
You make no sense. - 31/12/2012 06:07:50 PM 848 Views
I make no sense to you because you probably just don't understand my point. - 01/01/2013 08:09:11 AM 927 Views
Maybe the heat death of the univers occurs before you finally have a cohearant thought - 01/01/2013 07:34:31 PM 840 Views
You do realize that resorting to personal attacks reveal an inability to make sound arguments? *NM* - 02/01/2013 06:01:33 PM 594 Views
That is not an ad hominem attack, and your prior post was not very logically coherent - 02/01/2013 08:59:16 PM 922 Views
Instead of actually showing why my arguments would be incoherent or why I'm immature, he just said - 05/01/2013 02:02:23 AM 921 Views
He did not - 05/01/2013 01:39:40 PM 1228 Views
Facts are irrelevant when FUD is the order of the day. - 24/12/2012 04:34:18 PM 786 Views
It irritates me too. *NM* - 01/01/2013 01:55:05 PM 503 Views

Reply to Message