How do you know Nancy Lanza was mentally incompetent?
Helene Send a noteboard - 29/12/2012 07:06:40 AM
Everything I've read about her made her sound perfectly reasonable. A bit of a gun enthusiast, but nothing particularly wrong with her. She had a troubled son, but she was a happy and generous person with a good head on her shoulders.
Uhm... so it would be better if either Nancy or Adam had the gun? It's a simple question, would or wouldn't the situation have been better if there hadn't been guns in either their hands? I think the situation would have been better if there hadn't been guns. Apparently you disagree? To be sure, I'm just asking about this situation, it's not an analogy for total gun bans across the US.
That really annoys me, because 90% of America rejects BOTH views and always will, but the small radical fringe demanding each makes the others alarmism plausible when both SHOULD be dismissed as absurd. We cannot have effective reasonable gun control because absolutists on both sides dominate the conversation, even though virtually no one supports either.
First of all, I'm not in the US, so what I think has no impact. Second of all, where on earth do I say all guns should be banned? I'm just saying that where you apparently prefer a shoot out between mother and son, I think it would have been better if neither of them had guns.
Oh no, there's a Dutch person with an opinion, which turns gun rights radicals into unreasonable people! That's really a bizarre position to take. Especially because I haven't said that I think all guns should be banned.
is actually better, according to you, than a situation where neither of them have guns?
Why must it be all or nothing? Guns for all or guns for none?
Uhm... so it would be better if either Nancy or Adam had the gun? It's a simple question, would or wouldn't the situation have been better if there hadn't been guns in either their hands? I think the situation would have been better if there hadn't been guns. Apparently you disagree? To be sure, I'm just asking about this situation, it's not an analogy for total gun bans across the US.
That really annoys me, because 90% of America rejects BOTH views and always will, but the small radical fringe demanding each makes the others alarmism plausible when both SHOULD be dismissed as absurd. We cannot have effective reasonable gun control because absolutists on both sides dominate the conversation, even though virtually no one supports either.
First of all, I'm not in the US, so what I think has no impact. Second of all, where on earth do I say all guns should be banned? I'm just saying that where you apparently prefer a shoot out between mother and son, I think it would have been better if neither of them had guns.
Gun rights radicals insist all gun control=gun bans, and I cannot dismiss them by saying, "no one wants to ban all guns," because, look, here you are.
Oh no, there's a Dutch person with an opinion, which turns gun rights radicals into unreasonable people! That's really a bizarre position to take. Especially because I haven't said that I think all guns should be banned.
This message last edited by Helene on 29/12/2012 at 07:07:35 AM
When guns are a big national issue, how do reporters & pundits not know facts about them?
21/12/2012 05:33:14 PM
- 1565 Views
You don't hunt by walking into a classroom and shooting 20 deer
21/12/2012 05:56:16 PM
- 1007 Views
You're actually not right on that one
21/12/2012 07:49:53 PM
- 939 Views
That wasn't the point I was making
21/12/2012 09:49:40 PM
- 879 Views
You should probably clarify it then
21/12/2012 10:47:26 PM
- 1036 Views
His post was perfectly clear. Yours seemed like a response to an entirely different post.
21/12/2012 10:53:39 PM
- 1190 Views
Explain that remark, it is not obvious to me *NM*
21/12/2012 11:00:10 PM
- 537 Views
I think
21/12/2012 11:13:34 PM
- 872 Views
Thats' easy, there is simply no such thing as a 'hunting rifle'
21/12/2012 11:17:41 PM
- 874 Views
I'd say the expert gunsmith
21/12/2012 11:28:02 PM
- 924 Views
I'm also an expert at math and physics, should I be more forgiving about those too?
22/12/2012 12:38:45 AM
- 870 Views
Re: I'm also an expert at math and physics, should I be more forgiving about those too?
22/12/2012 01:00:18 AM
- 895 Views
Well I appreciate your calling it pedantic when you aren't an expert, thanks for correcting me
22/12/2012 01:15:08 AM
- 949 Views
Re: Well I appreciate your calling it pedantic when you aren't an expert, thanks for correcting me
22/12/2012 09:35:38 AM
- 1082 Views
I thought I was being perfectly clear.
21/12/2012 10:57:35 PM
- 891 Views
A bit of an aside, but I was reading that the gun used in the attack can be bought in Canada too.
21/12/2012 06:14:01 PM
- 892 Views
you're largely correct, which is why we need stronger laws on ownership not guns per se
21/12/2012 09:39:14 PM
- 849 Views
I can't think of a better reason than self defense
21/12/2012 10:33:26 PM
- 914 Views
He is right about Australia
21/12/2012 10:46:27 PM
- 886 Views
No kidding
21/12/2012 10:59:28 PM
- 869 Views
If you knew all that
21/12/2012 11:02:38 PM
- 901 Views
Because I used wiki of course
21/12/2012 11:21:25 PM
- 943 Views
He said ""self defense" is not a valid excuse to own a lethal weapon"
21/12/2012 11:34:59 PM
- 821 Views
Yes,which is un-cited, but I did prove it's a valid excuse to use one, so...
22/12/2012 12:36:19 AM
- 940 Views
The difference between allowing someone to defend themselves with a gun they have
22/12/2012 01:09:40 AM
- 860 Views
Which you apparently think they shouldn't be able to obtain? Catch-22 comes to mind.
22/12/2012 01:17:25 AM
- 905 Views
Re: Which you apparently think they shouldn't be able to obtain? Catch-22 comes to mind.
22/12/2012 09:51:51 AM
- 931 Views
A wood chipper isn't a gun, and evidence without proof isn't evidence
22/12/2012 06:10:34 PM
- 873 Views
If only you'd asked him for a citation rather than just saying you thought he was wrong eh? *NM*
23/12/2012 12:29:30 AM
- 648 Views
I think you are on the right track, but to the wrong destination; "lethal weapon" is redundant.
21/12/2012 11:05:29 PM
- 876 Views
My read is that the 2nd Amendment not only allows, but mandates, cop-killer bullets.
22/12/2012 12:45:04 AM
- 923 Views
Does the Second Amendment protect the rights of felons and the mentally incompetent to have guns?
22/12/2012 02:35:16 AM
- 1091 Views
Court rulings have determined that your Constitutional Rights can be restricted for felony/insanity *NM*
23/12/2012 12:59:31 PM
- 568 Views
Activist judges should not make law.
23/12/2012 02:04:42 PM
- 899 Views
I agree, but the courts have already ruled that way so we are stuck. *NM*
26/12/2012 03:03:35 PM
- 533 Views
Then I guess we need the courts to rule gun owners need screening, training and licensing.
26/12/2012 03:46:05 PM
- 886 Views
No, if you want to restrict the 2nd (or any other amendment) amend the Constitution
26/12/2012 07:56:19 PM
- 858 Views
I do not want to restrict the Second Amendment, only enact the regulations it explictly allows.
26/12/2012 08:50:09 PM
- 928 Views
I disagree with your interpretation. The simple EXISTANCE of the BoR makes it binding on the states
27/12/2012 03:46:17 PM
- 885 Views
"Congress shall make no law..." restricts the STATES? How, exactly?
28/12/2012 03:03:19 PM
- 848 Views
The 2nd amendment does not mention Congress in any way. There is that reading issue again.
28/12/2012 10:02:41 PM
- 797 Views
You said, "the Bill of Rights," not "the Second Amendment."
28/12/2012 11:10:00 PM
- 885 Views
Copy-N-Paste, get over it. we are specifically discussing the 2nd amendment, not everything.
29/12/2012 02:24:30 PM
- 783 Views
Some semi-autos are easily modified for full auto fire, making the distinction one w/o a difference.
21/12/2012 10:53:59 PM
- 957 Views
Correction: virtually all semi-automatics are easily convertable
21/12/2012 11:23:35 PM
- 898 Views
I have seen nothing on turning a semi-auto BAR into a fully automatic one.
22/12/2012 01:11:12 AM
- 816 Views
What's a BAR? In any event, link a diagram and I'll let you know
22/12/2012 01:26:31 AM
- 806 Views
Confusingly, there are two: The BAR you and I think of, and the "Browning BAR," a current semi-auto
22/12/2012 01:07:30 PM
- 930 Views
Department of Redundancy Department gets to name a lot of stuff, like "Milky Way Galaxy"
22/12/2012 05:01:45 PM
- 1085 Views
It only bothers me when people who know better speak of "the Glieseian solar system."
26/12/2012 05:33:34 PM
- 968 Views
Both terms are pretty stuck now
26/12/2012 10:48:38 PM
- 1032 Views
You realize that encourages rather than discourages my opposition to the usage, right?
27/12/2012 01:23:15 AM
- 812 Views
Well I can't say it surprises
27/12/2012 04:29:06 AM
- 752 Views
Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands.
22/12/2012 03:02:18 AM
- 813 Views
Re: Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands.
22/12/2012 04:12:30 AM
- 868 Views
Yes people can always still kill each other, humans are very ingenuitive
22/12/2012 04:42:04 AM
- 843 Views
I took a driving exam when I was 16, and have never been tested since, nor will I ever be.
23/12/2012 01:17:05 PM
- 995 Views
Never is a long time; just renewing a license requires retaking the eye exam most places.
23/12/2012 02:16:54 PM
- 906 Views
Rather hard to do an eye exam online or through the mail.
26/12/2012 03:08:06 PM
- 990 Views
Yes, it is, which is why I have always had to go by DPS for a new license.
26/12/2012 03:50:04 PM
- 822 Views
Tennessee and Florida pass them out like candy. For several years TN offered a no ID license
26/12/2012 08:02:39 PM
- 828 Views
I still find it odd they require no eye test, that either allows the blind drivers licenses.
26/12/2012 08:58:57 PM
- 872 Views
Oh yeah, we have wandered off course *shrug*
27/12/2012 03:55:55 PM
- 973 Views
Voter registration while getting a drivers license is distinct from the ease of licensing.
28/12/2012 03:35:34 PM
- 946 Views
Re: Voter registration while getting a drivers license is distinct from the ease of licensing.
28/12/2012 10:14:32 PM
- 741 Views
If you can prove someone voted illegally, call the ACLU and claim your $1000.
28/12/2012 11:18:38 PM
- 897 Views
puhleeze.... election fraud is a fact. Pick a state, ANY state, ANY election...
29/12/2012 02:41:40 PM
- 858 Views
Clip size is meaningless, semi-autos and even revolvers can be reloaded VERY quickly. *NM*
23/12/2012 01:20:59 PM
- 531 Views
1997 North Hollywood Shootout
22/12/2012 04:07:39 AM
- 948 Views
typical NRA bullshit response
22/12/2012 04:53:40 AM
- 891 Views
typical Moondog bullshit response
23/12/2012 01:06:12 PM
- 895 Views
of course! there is no connection between having a gun and shooting someone. got it
23/12/2012 02:33:18 PM
- 780 Views
There is no corelation between decidng to kill someone and what tool you use.
26/12/2012 03:11:08 PM
- 847 Views
By that logic no one needs a gun for self-defense; a coffee mug is perfectly adequate.
26/12/2012 09:06:51 PM
- 890 Views
I can kill you with my coffee mug... RESPECT THE MUG but I wouldn't, I might spill the coffee.
27/12/2012 04:08:52 PM
- 751 Views
So you are saying you do not need a gun then? I will keep mine anyway, thanks.
28/12/2012 04:19:03 PM
- 841 Views
You covered a bunch of different things, and completely misrepresentted what I wrote
28/12/2012 10:28:24 PM
- 885 Views
Home made explosives are pretty much always illegal; I did not want to overlook legal ones.
28/12/2012 11:44:19 PM
- 1073 Views
Re: Home made explosives are pretty much always illegal; I did not want to overlook legal ones.
29/12/2012 03:31:01 PM
- 822 Views
Laws against murder failed to prevent that, too; clearly they are ineffective and should be repealed
22/12/2012 06:02:24 AM
- 1000 Views
Such laws were never intended for prevention, they define actions that will be punished. *NM*
23/12/2012 12:57:57 PM
- 569 Views
So do laws against getting a gun without screening, training and certification.
23/12/2012 02:01:32 PM
- 825 Views
Then CHANGE the Constitution, don't ignore it. *NM*
26/12/2012 03:12:11 PM
- 501 Views
I am not suggesting either changing or ignoring the Constitution.
26/12/2012 04:01:02 PM
- 932 Views
Yes you are.
26/12/2012 08:06:01 PM
- 738 Views
Learn logic, and stop needlessly trying to teach me grammar.
26/12/2012 08:55:25 PM
- 898 Views
Lear to read, and I won't have to
27/12/2012 04:28:59 PM
- 954 Views
Ironically, you misspelled "learn."
28/12/2012 05:15:17 PM
- 1182 Views
I know, I thought about going back and fixing the typo, but thought it was funny so I left it. *NM*
28/12/2012 10:34:06 PM
- 531 Views
2 commas or 4 makes no difference one is a 12D the other is a sentance.
28/12/2012 10:55:31 PM
- 833 Views
It makes a huge difference when (incorrectly) claiming to know the text.
28/12/2012 11:31:51 PM
- 1136 Views
and by REGULATED, the authors meeant "able to use it effectively"
29/12/2012 03:47:57 PM
- 891 Views
You are wrong.
22/12/2012 12:14:40 PM
- 903 Views
That explains much; I read somewhere Brits are averse to it.
22/12/2012 01:17:15 PM
- 834 Views
What bemuses me about this thing with Adam Lanza, is that his mother had 5 registered guns
23/12/2012 07:10:26 AM
- 915 Views
She also had many knives, and blunt objecs around the house. Tools are only as good as the user
23/12/2012 01:10:58 PM
- 919 Views
So clearly she wasn't prepared enough... btw, do we know she was sleeping?
27/12/2012 10:52:03 AM
- 852 Views
That she 1) was in bed, 2) had guns for self-defense and 3) was shot 4 times strongly suggests sleep
28/12/2012 11:49:20 PM
- 931 Views
She was asleep with him in the house.
23/12/2012 02:24:47 PM
- 898 Views
LOOK, look, there is another one...
26/12/2012 03:13:45 PM
- 837 Views
I find the absolutist ant/pro-gun positions equally dangerous and absurd.
26/12/2012 04:20:37 PM
- 815 Views
So we should just *kinda* ignore the Constitution *this* time... But what about NEXT time...
26/12/2012 08:08:12 PM
- 800 Views
No, we should enact gun regulation the Constitution explicitly empowers.
26/12/2012 09:02:12 PM
- 814 Views
Which would be... NONE. *NM*
27/12/2012 04:31:53 PM
- 508 Views
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state...."
28/12/2012 05:14:49 PM
- 812 Views
Your point being?
27/12/2012 10:47:29 AM
- 795 Views
I am certain it would have been better, though not good, if she had been awake and shot him.
27/12/2012 02:16:13 PM
- 918 Views
So the situation of Nancy and Adam shooting at each other
28/12/2012 07:44:12 AM
- 925 Views
No, I believe they were both mentally incompetent to have guns; that does not mean EVERYONE is.
28/12/2012 02:19:51 PM
- 843 Views
How do you know Nancy Lanza was mentally incompetent?
29/12/2012 07:06:40 AM
- 849 Views
As a father, I would rather kill my own child than have him kill 26 other people.
27/12/2012 04:35:02 PM
- 759 Views
And as a father, you are somehow clairvoyant?
28/12/2012 07:43:08 AM
- 809 Views
Nice flippant unthinking reply, you and moondog should get together. *NM*
28/12/2012 04:55:14 PM
- 547 Views
How is my reply flippant? Your statement was unthinking, not mine.
29/12/2012 06:59:04 AM
- 845 Views
YOU asked if it would have been better for her to kill her own child instead, I answered.
29/12/2012 03:52:02 PM
- 863 Views
I asked if a shoot out between mother and son had been better, not whether she should have killed
29/12/2012 08:54:09 PM
- 792 Views
You make no sense.
31/12/2012 06:07:50 PM
- 867 Views
I make no sense to you because you probably just don't understand my point.
01/01/2013 08:09:11 AM
- 944 Views
Maybe the heat death of the univers occurs before you finally have a cohearant thought
01/01/2013 07:34:31 PM
- 858 Views
You do realize that resorting to personal attacks reveal an inability to make sound arguments? *NM*
02/01/2013 06:01:33 PM
- 604 Views
That is not an ad hominem attack, and your prior post was not very logically coherent
02/01/2013 08:59:16 PM
- 940 Views
Instead of actually showing why my arguments would be incoherent or why I'm immature, he just said
05/01/2013 02:02:23 AM
- 939 Views