Active Users:1119 Time:22/11/2024 02:01:00 PM
Yes, but . . . Handel Send a noteboard - 29/09/2009 10:28:43 PM

Your last sentence is what negates the rest of it. The Church is Christ established, not man established, so the Church is the body ruled by Christ, not the body ruled by Rome.

While the Roman Catholic Church is certainly not the only one to call itself, as a body, the "One True Church," it's frankly not their call to make.

The protestants did not leave the church. They remained, always, in communion with the body of Jesus Christ. Anything else is temporal politics.


The Church Christ established is "built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets Jesus Christ himself being the chief cornerstone" Eph 2:20. Christ gave the keys to the apostles--men chosen by God to lead and govern the Church on earth. Without leadership Christianity would have gone from Jewish cult to misguided social club in short order. Without the Apostles and their successors, the difficult questions about doctrine and praxis could not have been answered authoritatively. Does Rome "rule the Church"? Not in the same sense as Christ rules the Church, but Rome does govern the largest body of Christians in the world, as the Eastern patriarchates govern their autocephalous churches.

The Church Catholic (not specifically the Roman Catholic Church) is found where the faith once delivered to the saints is taught and practiced by the faithful, that faith "which has been believed everywhere, always and by all. That is truly and properly 'Catholic.'"

Protestantism rejected much of the faith, neglected it, while Rome has added to it in some instances; but Rome still holds and safeguards the Catholic faith that was rejected by the continental reformers, and modern Evangelical groups are even further removed from the Reformed traditions of Luther and Calvin.

A disclaimer: I am not Roman Catholic or Eastern Orthodox. I am a traditional Anglican (i.e. Catholic without Roman additions or Protestant subtractions) with Orthodox (Western Rite) sympathies. Also, this post may not make much sense because I am feeling a bit floopy.

Articles on Classic Anglicanism
Reply to message
How do different churches practice ecumenism? - 26/09/2009 05:39:54 PM 773 Views
Do your own homework. - 26/09/2009 05:49:35 PM 490 Views
In general, they don't. - 26/09/2009 09:07:54 PM 559 Views
Re: In general, they don't. - 26/09/2009 10:15:23 PM 515 Views
It's all translated... - 27/09/2009 07:12:18 AM 434 Views
Benedict's Point - 28/09/2009 07:52:39 PM 539 Views
It's a bad point. - 29/09/2009 08:53:24 PM 390 Views
Yes, but . . . - 29/09/2009 10:28:43 PM 674 Views
This is a common misconception concerning the Protestants... - 30/09/2009 02:42:23 PM 409 Views
Re: This is a common misconception concerning the Protestants... - 30/09/2009 08:42:19 PM 561 Views
More excellent articles. - 30/09/2009 08:47:19 PM 545 Views
Heh, "defective" - 27/09/2009 07:12:56 PM 423 Views
Re: How do different churches practice ecumenism? - 26/09/2009 06:32:12 PM 454 Views
In the United Methodist Church... - 27/09/2009 03:04:58 AM 432 Views
With AK-47s and hand grenades. *NM* - 27/09/2009 03:41:48 AM 162 Views
I've got to join one of those denominations... - 27/09/2009 03:43:30 PM 450 Views
Doesn't Fred Phelps worship the unexploded nuclear bomb? - 28/09/2009 02:49:55 AM 415 Views
Close enough - 28/09/2009 10:40:56 AM 478 Views
Ecumenism is stupid and pointless. - 28/09/2009 12:45:59 PM 488 Views

Reply to Message