Active Users:791 Time:01/04/2026 02:39:40 PM
You covered a bunch of different things, and completely misrepresentted what I wrote HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 28/12/2012 10:28:24 PM
I was referring to homemade explosives, your reading problem is flaring up again, and contrasting the eficacy of explosives vs bullets in killing, not federal regulations regarding obtaining a licesnnse to handle explosives. Besides, why would someone planning to illegally blow something(one) up care abuot the legality of having the explosives? That is illogical.

I would never put explosives in my coffee mug, there would be no room for the coffee.

High gun ownership=low crime. Thanks for proving my point. Now try finding what I asked you to find, a place where LOW gun ownership leads to LESS violent crime.

You want those restrictions in the US, fine. Good luck. Change the Constitution FIRST.



*******
For the sake of clarity, please note that I have NOT argued FOR unrestricted gun posession, just that restrictions were not Constitutional, and that most of the arguments used by people in favor of restrictions and bans are stupid.
Reply to message
When guns are a big national issue, how do reporters & pundits not know facts about them? - 21/12/2012 05:33:14 PM 1857 Views
You don't hunt by walking into a classroom and shooting 20 deer - 21/12/2012 05:56:16 PM 1260 Views
You're actually not right on that one - 21/12/2012 07:49:53 PM 1225 Views
That wasn't the point I was making - 21/12/2012 09:49:40 PM 1132 Views
You should probably clarify it then - 21/12/2012 10:47:26 PM 1310 Views
His post was perfectly clear. Yours seemed like a response to an entirely different post. - 21/12/2012 10:53:39 PM 1477 Views
Explain that remark, it is not obvious to me *NM* - 21/12/2012 11:00:10 PM 694 Views
I think - 21/12/2012 11:13:34 PM 1127 Views
Thats' easy, there is simply no such thing as a 'hunting rifle' - 21/12/2012 11:17:41 PM 1156 Views
I'd say the expert gunsmith - 21/12/2012 11:28:02 PM 1208 Views
I thought I was being perfectly clear. - 21/12/2012 10:57:35 PM 1170 Views
Re: I thought I was being perfectly clear. - 21/12/2012 11:25:04 PM 1192 Views
Oh I wasn't commenting on the standard of people here - 21/12/2012 11:29:36 PM 1169 Views
you're largely correct, which is why we need stronger laws on ownership not guns per se - 21/12/2012 09:39:14 PM 1127 Views
I can't think of a better reason than self defense - 21/12/2012 10:33:26 PM 1196 Views
He is right about Australia - 21/12/2012 10:46:27 PM 1125 Views
No kidding - 21/12/2012 10:59:28 PM 1107 Views
If you knew all that - 21/12/2012 11:02:38 PM 1189 Views
I think you are on the right track, but to the wrong destination; "lethal weapon" is redundant. - 21/12/2012 11:05:29 PM 1126 Views
My read is that the 2nd Amendment not only allows, but mandates, cop-killer bullets. - 22/12/2012 12:45:04 AM 1217 Views
Does the Second Amendment protect the rights of felons and the mentally incompetent to have guns? - 22/12/2012 02:35:16 AM 1380 Views
Some semi-autos are easily modified for full auto fire, making the distinction one w/o a difference. - 21/12/2012 10:53:59 PM 1226 Views
Correction: virtually all semi-automatics are easily convertable - 21/12/2012 11:23:35 PM 1159 Views
How many of the people I was complaining about would know that? - 22/12/2012 12:48:59 AM 1144 Views
Some, possibly? I am ever the optimist - 22/12/2012 12:58:36 AM 1107 Views
I have seen nothing on turning a semi-auto BAR into a fully automatic one. - 22/12/2012 01:11:12 AM 1109 Views
What's a BAR? In any event, link a diagram and I'll let you know - 22/12/2012 01:26:31 AM 1081 Views
Confusingly, there are two: The BAR you and I think of, and the "Browning BAR," a current semi-auto - 22/12/2012 01:07:30 PM 1281 Views
Department of Redundancy Department gets to name a lot of stuff, like "Milky Way Galaxy" - 22/12/2012 05:01:45 PM 1370 Views
It only bothers me when people who know better speak of "the Glieseian solar system." - 26/12/2012 05:33:34 PM 1226 Views
Both terms are pretty stuck now - 26/12/2012 10:48:38 PM 1302 Views
You realize that encourages rather than discourages my opposition to the usage, right? - 27/12/2012 01:23:15 AM 1064 Views
Well I can't say it surprises - 27/12/2012 04:29:06 AM 1030 Views
No one expects the Online Inquisition! - 27/12/2012 05:20:44 PM 1067 Views
I've enjoyed most reboots - 28/12/2012 01:06:05 AM 1000 Views
Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands. - 22/12/2012 03:02:18 AM 1071 Views
Re: Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands. - 22/12/2012 04:12:30 AM 1118 Views
umm... - 22/12/2012 12:41:31 PM 1017 Views
1997 North Hollywood Shootout - 22/12/2012 04:07:39 AM 1204 Views
typical NRA bullshit response - 22/12/2012 04:53:40 AM 1140 Views
typical Moondog bullshit response - 23/12/2012 01:06:12 PM 1134 Views
of course! there is no connection between having a gun and shooting someone. got it - 23/12/2012 02:33:18 PM 1034 Views
There is no corelation between decidng to kill someone and what tool you use. - 26/12/2012 03:11:08 PM 1080 Views
By that logic no one needs a gun for self-defense; a coffee mug is perfectly adequate. - 26/12/2012 09:06:51 PM 1146 Views
I can kill you with my coffee mug... RESPECT THE MUG but I wouldn't, I might spill the coffee. - 27/12/2012 04:08:52 PM 1015 Views
So you are saying you do not need a gun then? I will keep mine anyway, thanks. - 28/12/2012 04:19:03 PM 1125 Views
You covered a bunch of different things, and completely misrepresentted what I wrote - 28/12/2012 10:28:24 PM 1151 Views
Laws against murder failed to prevent that, too; clearly they are ineffective and should be repealed - 22/12/2012 06:02:24 AM 1284 Views
Such laws were never intended for prevention, they define actions that will be punished. *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:57:57 PM 681 Views
So do laws against getting a gun without screening, training and certification. - 23/12/2012 02:01:32 PM 1119 Views
Then CHANGE the Constitution, don't ignore it. *NM* - 26/12/2012 03:12:11 PM 605 Views
I am not suggesting either changing or ignoring the Constitution. - 26/12/2012 04:01:02 PM 1183 Views
Yes you are. - 26/12/2012 08:06:01 PM 1014 Views
Learn logic, and stop needlessly trying to teach me grammar. - 26/12/2012 08:55:25 PM 1168 Views
Lear to read, and I won't have to - 27/12/2012 04:28:59 PM 1238 Views
You are wrong. - 22/12/2012 12:14:40 PM 1129 Views
That explains much; I read somewhere Brits are averse to it. - 22/12/2012 01:17:15 PM 1114 Views
We're also averse to being wrong. - 22/12/2012 02:53:49 PM 1154 Views
So you say... - 22/12/2012 03:32:16 PM 1094 Views
guns r stpid *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:39:30 AM 773 Views
What bemuses me about this thing with Adam Lanza, is that his mother had 5 registered guns - 23/12/2012 07:10:26 AM 1149 Views
She was asleep with him in the house. - 23/12/2012 02:24:47 PM 1168 Views
LOOK, look, there is another one... - 26/12/2012 03:13:45 PM 1101 Views
I find the absolutist ant/pro-gun positions equally dangerous and absurd. - 26/12/2012 04:20:37 PM 1100 Views
So we should just *kinda* ignore the Constitution *this* time... But what about NEXT time... - 26/12/2012 08:08:12 PM 1104 Views
No, we should enact gun regulation the Constitution explicitly empowers. - 26/12/2012 09:02:12 PM 1100 Views
Which would be... NONE. *NM* - 27/12/2012 04:31:53 PM 654 Views
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state...." - 28/12/2012 05:14:49 PM 1092 Views
*see previous grammar lesson* *NM* - 28/12/2012 10:31:43 PM 606 Views
The instant it becomes relevant, I shall. - 28/12/2012 11:45:01 PM 1267 Views
Your point being? - 27/12/2012 10:47:29 AM 1068 Views
As a father, I would rather kill my own child than have him kill 26 other people. - 27/12/2012 04:35:02 PM 1033 Views
Facts are irrelevant when FUD is the order of the day. - 24/12/2012 04:34:18 PM 1077 Views
It irritates me too. *NM* - 01/01/2013 01:55:05 PM 638 Views

Reply to Message