Active Users:1259 Time:01/11/2025 01:33:48 AM
You covered a bunch of different things, and completely misrepresentted what I wrote HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 28/12/2012 10:28:24 PM
I was referring to homemade explosives, your reading problem is flaring up again, and contrasting the eficacy of explosives vs bullets in killing, not federal regulations regarding obtaining a licesnnse to handle explosives. Besides, why would someone planning to illegally blow something(one) up care abuot the legality of having the explosives? That is illogical.

I would never put explosives in my coffee mug, there would be no room for the coffee.

High gun ownership=low crime. Thanks for proving my point. Now try finding what I asked you to find, a place where LOW gun ownership leads to LESS violent crime.

You want those restrictions in the US, fine. Good luck. Change the Constitution FIRST.



*******
For the sake of clarity, please note that I have NOT argued FOR unrestricted gun posession, just that restrictions were not Constitutional, and that most of the arguments used by people in favor of restrictions and bans are stupid.
Reply to message
When guns are a big national issue, how do reporters & pundits not know facts about them? - 21/12/2012 05:33:14 PM 1758 Views
You don't hunt by walking into a classroom and shooting 20 deer - 21/12/2012 05:56:16 PM 1178 Views
You're actually not right on that one - 21/12/2012 07:49:53 PM 1123 Views
That wasn't the point I was making - 21/12/2012 09:49:40 PM 1049 Views
You should probably clarify it then - 21/12/2012 10:47:26 PM 1221 Views
His post was perfectly clear. Yours seemed like a response to an entirely different post. - 21/12/2012 10:53:39 PM 1388 Views
Explain that remark, it is not obvious to me *NM* - 21/12/2012 11:00:10 PM 621 Views
I think - 21/12/2012 11:13:34 PM 1046 Views
Thats' easy, there is simply no such thing as a 'hunting rifle' - 21/12/2012 11:17:41 PM 1052 Views
I'd say the expert gunsmith - 21/12/2012 11:28:02 PM 1119 Views
I thought I was being perfectly clear. - 21/12/2012 10:57:35 PM 1077 Views
Re: I thought I was being perfectly clear. - 21/12/2012 11:25:04 PM 1114 Views
Oh I wasn't commenting on the standard of people here - 21/12/2012 11:29:36 PM 1074 Views
you're largely correct, which is why we need stronger laws on ownership not guns per se - 21/12/2012 09:39:14 PM 1038 Views
I can't think of a better reason than self defense - 21/12/2012 10:33:26 PM 1100 Views
He is right about Australia - 21/12/2012 10:46:27 PM 1044 Views
No kidding - 21/12/2012 10:59:28 PM 1037 Views
If you knew all that - 21/12/2012 11:02:38 PM 1112 Views
I think you are on the right track, but to the wrong destination; "lethal weapon" is redundant. - 21/12/2012 11:05:29 PM 1048 Views
My read is that the 2nd Amendment not only allows, but mandates, cop-killer bullets. - 22/12/2012 12:45:04 AM 1127 Views
Does the Second Amendment protect the rights of felons and the mentally incompetent to have guns? - 22/12/2012 02:35:16 AM 1277 Views
Some semi-autos are easily modified for full auto fire, making the distinction one w/o a difference. - 21/12/2012 10:53:59 PM 1138 Views
Correction: virtually all semi-automatics are easily convertable - 21/12/2012 11:23:35 PM 1074 Views
How many of the people I was complaining about would know that? - 22/12/2012 12:48:59 AM 1044 Views
Some, possibly? I am ever the optimist - 22/12/2012 12:58:36 AM 1026 Views
I have seen nothing on turning a semi-auto BAR into a fully automatic one. - 22/12/2012 01:11:12 AM 1007 Views
What's a BAR? In any event, link a diagram and I'll let you know - 22/12/2012 01:26:31 AM 984 Views
Confusingly, there are two: The BAR you and I think of, and the "Browning BAR," a current semi-auto - 22/12/2012 01:07:30 PM 1160 Views
Department of Redundancy Department gets to name a lot of stuff, like "Milky Way Galaxy" - 22/12/2012 05:01:45 PM 1264 Views
It only bothers me when people who know better speak of "the Glieseian solar system." - 26/12/2012 05:33:34 PM 1134 Views
Both terms are pretty stuck now - 26/12/2012 10:48:38 PM 1213 Views
You realize that encourages rather than discourages my opposition to the usage, right? - 27/12/2012 01:23:15 AM 965 Views
Well I can't say it surprises - 27/12/2012 04:29:06 AM 942 Views
No one expects the Online Inquisition! - 27/12/2012 05:20:44 PM 976 Views
I've enjoyed most reboots - 28/12/2012 01:06:05 AM 901 Views
Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands. - 22/12/2012 03:02:18 AM 984 Views
Re: Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands. - 22/12/2012 04:12:30 AM 1039 Views
umm... - 22/12/2012 12:41:31 PM 931 Views
1997 North Hollywood Shootout - 22/12/2012 04:07:39 AM 1127 Views
typical NRA bullshit response - 22/12/2012 04:53:40 AM 1058 Views
typical Moondog bullshit response - 23/12/2012 01:06:12 PM 1062 Views
of course! there is no connection between having a gun and shooting someone. got it - 23/12/2012 02:33:18 PM 954 Views
There is no corelation between decidng to kill someone and what tool you use. - 26/12/2012 03:11:08 PM 1004 Views
By that logic no one needs a gun for self-defense; a coffee mug is perfectly adequate. - 26/12/2012 09:06:51 PM 1060 Views
I can kill you with my coffee mug... RESPECT THE MUG but I wouldn't, I might spill the coffee. - 27/12/2012 04:08:52 PM 927 Views
So you are saying you do not need a gun then? I will keep mine anyway, thanks. - 28/12/2012 04:19:03 PM 1020 Views
You covered a bunch of different things, and completely misrepresentted what I wrote - 28/12/2012 10:28:24 PM 1067 Views
Laws against murder failed to prevent that, too; clearly they are ineffective and should be repealed - 22/12/2012 06:02:24 AM 1185 Views
Such laws were never intended for prevention, they define actions that will be punished. *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:57:57 PM 640 Views
So do laws against getting a gun without screening, training and certification. - 23/12/2012 02:01:32 PM 1007 Views
Then CHANGE the Constitution, don't ignore it. *NM* - 26/12/2012 03:12:11 PM 559 Views
I am not suggesting either changing or ignoring the Constitution. - 26/12/2012 04:01:02 PM 1108 Views
Yes you are. - 26/12/2012 08:06:01 PM 934 Views
Learn logic, and stop needlessly trying to teach me grammar. - 26/12/2012 08:55:25 PM 1078 Views
Lear to read, and I won't have to - 27/12/2012 04:28:59 PM 1133 Views
You are wrong. - 22/12/2012 12:14:40 PM 1056 Views
That explains much; I read somewhere Brits are averse to it. - 22/12/2012 01:17:15 PM 1026 Views
We're also averse to being wrong. - 22/12/2012 02:53:49 PM 1066 Views
So you say... - 22/12/2012 03:32:16 PM 1001 Views
guns r stpid *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:39:30 AM 725 Views
What bemuses me about this thing with Adam Lanza, is that his mother had 5 registered guns - 23/12/2012 07:10:26 AM 1068 Views
She was asleep with him in the house. - 23/12/2012 02:24:47 PM 1093 Views
LOOK, look, there is another one... - 26/12/2012 03:13:45 PM 1010 Views
I find the absolutist ant/pro-gun positions equally dangerous and absurd. - 26/12/2012 04:20:37 PM 1015 Views
So we should just *kinda* ignore the Constitution *this* time... But what about NEXT time... - 26/12/2012 08:08:12 PM 1001 Views
No, we should enact gun regulation the Constitution explicitly empowers. - 26/12/2012 09:02:12 PM 1003 Views
Which would be... NONE. *NM* - 27/12/2012 04:31:53 PM 601 Views
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state...." - 28/12/2012 05:14:49 PM 1004 Views
*see previous grammar lesson* *NM* - 28/12/2012 10:31:43 PM 563 Views
The instant it becomes relevant, I shall. - 28/12/2012 11:45:01 PM 1186 Views
Your point being? - 27/12/2012 10:47:29 AM 983 Views
As a father, I would rather kill my own child than have him kill 26 other people. - 27/12/2012 04:35:02 PM 931 Views
Facts are irrelevant when FUD is the order of the day. - 24/12/2012 04:34:18 PM 973 Views
It irritates me too. *NM* - 01/01/2013 01:55:05 PM 596 Views

Reply to Message