Active Users:2569 Time:22/01/2025 05:28:11 PM
Re: Which you apparently think they shouldn't be able to obtain? Catch-22 comes to mind. TheCrownless Send a noteboard - 22/12/2012 09:51:51 AM
I'd like to see someone present a citation that in that country it isn't, which is frankly utterly irrelevant but still, right now it is just an assertion. I have shown, and will be glad to quote, that under their laws it's entirely allowed to use own in self-defense... which would seem more important.

for a legitimate reason and allowing people to buy guns for the purpose of self defence are very different things. If you really disagree with that then I honestly do not know what to say.


Oh, I see the difference, but I haven't seen anyone prove by citation that Australia doesn't allow that, my point it saying its okay to defend yourself with X is acknowledging its legitimacy for acquisition, I really couldn't care whether or not Australia's law are contradictory or paradoxical on the matter.


If you want to look up Australia's gun laws it's there on the internet, if you're going to come in and call someone (incorrectly) wrong then you should bring the contradictory evidence, except you won't find any and I suspect you know that and it's a stalling tactic.

You're being silly, people are allowed to use reasonable force to defend themselves. If you live in a warehouse with a wood chipper it's reasonable to push someone in it for self defence if thats the only way to keep yourself safe. It isn't reasonable to install one in your living room for the sole purpose of catching burglars.

It's a perfectly logical stance, even if you disagree with it, but then that's twice in the same thread you've done that so I suspect I'm wasting my time discussing the issue.
Come to the dark side, We have candy!

I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
Reply to message
When guns are a big national issue, how do reporters & pundits not know facts about them? - 21/12/2012 05:33:14 PM 1584 Views
You don't hunt by walking into a classroom and shooting 20 deer - 21/12/2012 05:56:16 PM 1020 Views
You're actually not right on that one - 21/12/2012 07:49:53 PM 953 Views
That wasn't the point I was making - 21/12/2012 09:49:40 PM 893 Views
You should probably clarify it then - 21/12/2012 10:47:26 PM 1052 Views
His post was perfectly clear. Yours seemed like a response to an entirely different post. - 21/12/2012 10:53:39 PM 1203 Views
Explain that remark, it is not obvious to me *NM* - 21/12/2012 11:00:10 PM 540 Views
I think - 21/12/2012 11:13:34 PM 881 Views
Thats' easy, there is simply no such thing as a 'hunting rifle' - 21/12/2012 11:17:41 PM 890 Views
I'd say the expert gunsmith - 21/12/2012 11:28:02 PM 942 Views
I thought I was being perfectly clear. - 21/12/2012 10:57:35 PM 906 Views
Re: I thought I was being perfectly clear. - 21/12/2012 11:25:04 PM 955 Views
Oh I wasn't commenting on the standard of people here - 21/12/2012 11:29:36 PM 876 Views
you're largely correct, which is why we need stronger laws on ownership not guns per se - 21/12/2012 09:39:14 PM 866 Views
I can't think of a better reason than self defense - 21/12/2012 10:33:26 PM 929 Views
He is right about Australia - 21/12/2012 10:46:27 PM 898 Views
No kidding - 21/12/2012 10:59:28 PM 883 Views
If you knew all that - 21/12/2012 11:02:38 PM 919 Views
Because I used wiki of course - 21/12/2012 11:21:25 PM 957 Views
He said ""self defense" is not a valid excuse to own a lethal weapon" - 21/12/2012 11:34:59 PM 836 Views
Yes,which is un-cited, but I did prove it's a valid excuse to use one, so... - 22/12/2012 12:36:19 AM 954 Views
The difference between allowing someone to defend themselves with a gun they have - 22/12/2012 01:09:40 AM 879 Views
Which you apparently think they shouldn't be able to obtain? Catch-22 comes to mind. - 22/12/2012 01:17:25 AM 910 Views
Re: Which you apparently think they shouldn't be able to obtain? Catch-22 comes to mind. - 22/12/2012 09:51:51 AM 942 Views
A wood chipper isn't a gun, and evidence without proof isn't evidence - 22/12/2012 06:10:34 PM 888 Views
If only you'd asked him for a citation rather than just saying you thought he was wrong eh? *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:29:30 AM 653 Views
Same thing, don't split hairs *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:43:44 AM 615 Views
I think you are on the right track, but to the wrong destination; "lethal weapon" is redundant. - 21/12/2012 11:05:29 PM 886 Views
My read is that the 2nd Amendment not only allows, but mandates, cop-killer bullets. - 22/12/2012 12:45:04 AM 935 Views
Does the Second Amendment protect the rights of felons and the mentally incompetent to have guns? - 22/12/2012 02:35:16 AM 1104 Views
Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands. - 22/12/2012 03:02:18 AM 825 Views
Re: Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands. - 22/12/2012 04:12:30 AM 886 Views
umm... - 22/12/2012 12:41:31 PM 793 Views
1997 North Hollywood Shootout - 22/12/2012 04:07:39 AM 963 Views
Laws against murder failed to prevent that, too; clearly they are ineffective and should be repealed - 22/12/2012 06:02:24 AM 1013 Views
Such laws were never intended for prevention, they define actions that will be punished. *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:57:57 PM 576 Views
So do laws against getting a gun without screening, training and certification. - 23/12/2012 02:01:32 PM 839 Views
Then CHANGE the Constitution, don't ignore it. *NM* - 26/12/2012 03:12:11 PM 503 Views
I am not suggesting either changing or ignoring the Constitution. - 26/12/2012 04:01:02 PM 943 Views
Yes you are. - 26/12/2012 08:06:01 PM 749 Views
Learn logic, and stop needlessly trying to teach me grammar. - 26/12/2012 08:55:25 PM 912 Views
Lear to read, and I won't have to - 27/12/2012 04:28:59 PM 965 Views
You are wrong. - 22/12/2012 12:14:40 PM 913 Views
That explains much; I read somewhere Brits are averse to it. - 22/12/2012 01:17:15 PM 851 Views
We're also averse to being wrong. - 22/12/2012 02:53:49 PM 919 Views
So you say... - 22/12/2012 03:32:16 PM 838 Views
guns r stpid *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:39:30 AM 593 Views
What bemuses me about this thing with Adam Lanza, is that his mother had 5 registered guns - 23/12/2012 07:10:26 AM 918 Views
She was asleep with him in the house. - 23/12/2012 02:24:47 PM 911 Views
LOOK, look, there is another one... - 26/12/2012 03:13:45 PM 853 Views
I find the absolutist ant/pro-gun positions equally dangerous and absurd. - 26/12/2012 04:20:37 PM 827 Views
So we should just *kinda* ignore the Constitution *this* time... But what about NEXT time... - 26/12/2012 08:08:12 PM 813 Views
No, we should enact gun regulation the Constitution explicitly empowers. - 26/12/2012 09:02:12 PM 827 Views
Which would be... NONE. *NM* - 27/12/2012 04:31:53 PM 515 Views
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state...." - 28/12/2012 05:14:49 PM 825 Views
*see previous grammar lesson* *NM* - 28/12/2012 10:31:43 PM 498 Views
The instant it becomes relevant, I shall. - 28/12/2012 11:45:01 PM 1022 Views
Your point being? - 27/12/2012 10:47:29 AM 806 Views
Facts are irrelevant when FUD is the order of the day. - 24/12/2012 04:34:18 PM 818 Views
It irritates me too. *NM* - 01/01/2013 01:55:05 PM 518 Views

Reply to Message