What's a BAR? In any event, link a diagram and I'll let you know
Isaac Send a noteboard - 22/12/2012 01:26:31 AM
If you're talking about a Browning M1918, the only BAR that comes to mind, there is a reason I said 'virtually all' and pre-WWII attempts at semi or auto were pretty craptacular at best.
If you've seen the specs on whatever the hell it is you know them better than I, I've memorized most US/NATO stuff and the real popular ones, but there are thousands and thousands of variations. Some would be impossible, or at least practically impossible, to modify. For most, it's literally something you could do with a file in ten minutes. But the principles are more or less the same between guns, it still varies between guns.
but there seems to be a world of difference between military-to-civilian conversions and exclusively, originally, civilian designs. Be careful, now; I am sure the last thing you want to do is lend credence to the anti-gun lobbys claims ALL semi-automatics can be made fully automatic after a couple minutes filing down the firing pin.
Big civilian differences tend to be barrel twist and powder, and of course ammo type. Also the lobbyist don't interest me, anymore than their old ass-hattery about the importance of hunting. They can suck my $%#@, truth is truth. No, not all can be converted that easy of course, and some not all, but its all about the specific design.
As I try to explain to people from time to time, a semi-automatic is an improvement on a fully automatic weapon. Semi = better than = Full Auto
Not that I had looked until about an hour ago, but what I have found so far says it is impossible. Not saying you are wrong; you know the specs far better than I,
If you've seen the specs on whatever the hell it is you know them better than I, I've memorized most US/NATO stuff and the real popular ones, but there are thousands and thousands of variations. Some would be impossible, or at least practically impossible, to modify. For most, it's literally something you could do with a file in ten minutes. But the principles are more or less the same between guns, it still varies between guns.
but there seems to be a world of difference between military-to-civilian conversions and exclusively, originally, civilian designs. Be careful, now; I am sure the last thing you want to do is lend credence to the anti-gun lobbys claims ALL semi-automatics can be made fully automatic after a couple minutes filing down the firing pin.
Big civilian differences tend to be barrel twist and powder, and of course ammo type. Also the lobbyist don't interest me, anymore than their old ass-hattery about the importance of hunting. They can suck my $%#@, truth is truth. No, not all can be converted that easy of course, and some not all, but its all about the specific design.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
When guns are a big national issue, how do reporters & pundits not know facts about them?
- 21/12/2012 05:33:14 PM
1639 Views
You don't hunt by walking into a classroom and shooting 20 deer
- 21/12/2012 05:56:16 PM
1063 Views
You're actually not right on that one
- 21/12/2012 07:49:53 PM
996 Views
That wasn't the point I was making
- 21/12/2012 09:49:40 PM
933 Views
You should probably clarify it then
- 21/12/2012 10:47:26 PM
1092 Views
His post was perfectly clear. Yours seemed like a response to an entirely different post.
- 21/12/2012 10:53:39 PM
1254 Views
Explain that remark, it is not obvious to me *NM*
- 21/12/2012 11:00:10 PM
559 Views
I think
- 21/12/2012 11:13:34 PM
927 Views
Thats' easy, there is simply no such thing as a 'hunting rifle'
- 21/12/2012 11:17:41 PM
932 Views
I'd say the expert gunsmith
- 21/12/2012 11:28:02 PM
993 Views
I'm also an expert at math and physics, should I be more forgiving about those too?
- 22/12/2012 12:38:45 AM
935 Views
Re: I'm also an expert at math and physics, should I be more forgiving about those too?
- 22/12/2012 01:00:18 AM
959 Views
Well I appreciate your calling it pedantic when you aren't an expert, thanks for correcting me
- 22/12/2012 01:15:08 AM
1008 Views
Re: Well I appreciate your calling it pedantic when you aren't an expert, thanks for correcting me
- 22/12/2012 09:35:38 AM
1116 Views
I thought I was being perfectly clear.
- 21/12/2012 10:57:35 PM
954 Views
A bit of an aside, but I was reading that the gun used in the attack can be bought in Canada too.
- 21/12/2012 06:14:01 PM
959 Views
you're largely correct, which is why we need stronger laws on ownership not guns per se
- 21/12/2012 09:39:14 PM
909 Views
I can't think of a better reason than self defense
- 21/12/2012 10:33:26 PM
976 Views
He is right about Australia
- 21/12/2012 10:46:27 PM
940 Views
No kidding 
- 21/12/2012 10:59:28 PM
928 Views
- 21/12/2012 10:59:28 PM
928 Views
If you knew all that
- 21/12/2012 11:02:38 PM
976 Views
Because I used wiki of course
- 21/12/2012 11:21:25 PM
1003 Views
He said ""self defense" is not a valid excuse to own a lethal weapon"
- 21/12/2012 11:34:59 PM
878 Views
Yes,which is un-cited, but I did prove it's a valid excuse to use one, so...
- 22/12/2012 12:36:19 AM
1000 Views
The difference between allowing someone to defend themselves with a gun they have
- 22/12/2012 01:09:40 AM
929 Views
Which you apparently think they shouldn't be able to obtain? Catch-22 comes to mind.
- 22/12/2012 01:17:25 AM
940 Views
Re: Which you apparently think they shouldn't be able to obtain? Catch-22 comes to mind.
- 22/12/2012 09:51:51 AM
1018 Views
A wood chipper isn't a gun, and evidence without proof isn't evidence
- 22/12/2012 06:10:34 PM
935 Views
If only you'd asked him for a citation rather than just saying you thought he was wrong eh? *NM*
- 23/12/2012 12:29:30 AM
672 Views
I think you are on the right track, but to the wrong destination; "lethal weapon" is redundant.
- 21/12/2012 11:05:29 PM
932 Views
My read is that the 2nd Amendment not only allows, but mandates, cop-killer bullets.
- 22/12/2012 12:45:04 AM
987 Views
Does the Second Amendment protect the rights of felons and the mentally incompetent to have guns?
- 22/12/2012 02:35:16 AM
1159 Views
Court rulings have determined that your Constitutional Rights can be restricted for felony/insanity *NM*
- 23/12/2012 12:59:31 PM
592 Views
Activist judges should not make law.
- 23/12/2012 02:04:42 PM
956 Views
- 23/12/2012 02:04:42 PM
956 Views
I agree, but the courts have already ruled that way so we are stuck. *NM*
- 26/12/2012 03:03:35 PM
559 Views
Then I guess we need the courts to rule gun owners need screening, training and licensing.
- 26/12/2012 03:46:05 PM
947 Views
No, if you want to restrict the 2nd (or any other amendment) amend the Constitution
- 26/12/2012 07:56:19 PM
915 Views
I do not want to restrict the Second Amendment, only enact the regulations it explictly allows.
- 26/12/2012 08:50:09 PM
992 Views
I disagree with your interpretation. The simple EXISTANCE of the BoR makes it binding on the states
- 27/12/2012 03:46:17 PM
940 Views
"Congress shall make no law..." restricts the STATES? How, exactly?
- 28/12/2012 03:03:19 PM
911 Views
The 2nd amendment does not mention Congress in any way. There is that reading issue again.
- 28/12/2012 10:02:41 PM
858 Views
You said, "the Bill of Rights," not "the Second Amendment."
- 28/12/2012 11:10:00 PM
917 Views
Copy-N-Paste, get over it. we are specifically discussing the 2nd amendment, not everything.
- 29/12/2012 02:24:30 PM
851 Views
Some semi-autos are easily modified for full auto fire, making the distinction one w/o a difference.
- 21/12/2012 10:53:59 PM
1018 Views
Correction: virtually all semi-automatics are easily convertable
- 21/12/2012 11:23:35 PM
954 Views
I have seen nothing on turning a semi-auto BAR into a fully automatic one.
- 22/12/2012 01:11:12 AM
870 Views
What's a BAR? In any event, link a diagram and I'll let you know
- 22/12/2012 01:26:31 AM
867 Views
Confusingly, there are two: The BAR you and I think of, and the "Browning BAR," a current semi-auto
- 22/12/2012 01:07:30 PM
1009 Views
Department of Redundancy Department gets to name a lot of stuff, like "Milky Way Galaxy"
- 22/12/2012 05:01:45 PM
1146 Views
It only bothers me when people who know better speak of "the Glieseian solar system." 
- 26/12/2012 05:33:34 PM
1028 Views
- 26/12/2012 05:33:34 PM
1028 Views
Both terms are pretty stuck now
- 26/12/2012 10:48:38 PM
1090 Views
You realize that encourages rather than discourages my opposition to the usage, right?
- 27/12/2012 01:23:15 AM
853 Views
- 27/12/2012 01:23:15 AM
853 Views
Well I can't say it surprises
- 27/12/2012 04:29:06 AM
826 Views
Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands.
- 22/12/2012 03:02:18 AM
865 Views
Re: Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands.
- 22/12/2012 04:12:30 AM
929 Views
Yes people can always still kill each other, humans are very ingenuitive
- 22/12/2012 04:42:04 AM
908 Views
I took a driving exam when I was 16, and have never been tested since, nor will I ever be.
- 23/12/2012 01:17:05 PM
1061 Views
Never is a long time; just renewing a license requires retaking the eye exam most places.
- 23/12/2012 02:16:54 PM
965 Views
Rather hard to do an eye exam online or through the mail.
- 26/12/2012 03:08:06 PM
1043 Views
Yes, it is, which is why I have always had to go by DPS for a new license.
- 26/12/2012 03:50:04 PM
893 Views
Tennessee and Florida pass them out like candy. For several years TN offered a no ID license
- 26/12/2012 08:02:39 PM
893 Views
I still find it odd they require no eye test, that either allows the blind drivers licenses.
- 26/12/2012 08:58:57 PM
925 Views
Oh yeah, we have wandered off course *shrug*
- 27/12/2012 03:55:55 PM
1031 Views
Voter registration while getting a drivers license is distinct from the ease of licensing.
- 28/12/2012 03:35:34 PM
1007 Views
Re: Voter registration while getting a drivers license is distinct from the ease of licensing.
- 28/12/2012 10:14:32 PM
793 Views
If you can prove someone voted illegally, call the ACLU and claim your $1000.
- 28/12/2012 11:18:38 PM
950 Views
puhleeze.... election fraud is a fact. Pick a state, ANY state, ANY election...
- 29/12/2012 02:41:40 PM
922 Views
Clip size is meaningless, semi-autos and even revolvers can be reloaded VERY quickly. *NM*
- 23/12/2012 01:20:59 PM
557 Views
1997 North Hollywood Shootout
- 22/12/2012 04:07:39 AM
1015 Views
typical NRA bullshit response
- 22/12/2012 04:53:40 AM
952 Views
typical Moondog bullshit response
- 23/12/2012 01:06:12 PM
961 Views
of course! there is no connection between having a gun and shooting someone. got it 
- 23/12/2012 02:33:18 PM
840 Views
- 23/12/2012 02:33:18 PM
840 Views
There is no corelation between decidng to kill someone and what tool you use.
- 26/12/2012 03:11:08 PM
905 Views
By that logic no one needs a gun for self-defense; a coffee mug is perfectly adequate.
- 26/12/2012 09:06:51 PM
953 Views
I can kill you with my coffee mug... RESPECT THE MUG but I wouldn't, I might spill the coffee.
- 27/12/2012 04:08:52 PM
812 Views
So you are saying you do not need a gun then? I will keep mine anyway, thanks.
- 28/12/2012 04:19:03 PM
906 Views
- 28/12/2012 04:19:03 PM
906 Views
You covered a bunch of different things, and completely misrepresentted what I wrote
- 28/12/2012 10:28:24 PM
945 Views
Home made explosives are pretty much always illegal; I did not want to overlook legal ones.
- 28/12/2012 11:44:19 PM
1127 Views
Re: Home made explosives are pretty much always illegal; I did not want to overlook legal ones.
- 29/12/2012 03:31:01 PM
879 Views
Laws against murder failed to prevent that, too; clearly they are ineffective and should be repealed
- 22/12/2012 06:02:24 AM
1061 Views
Such laws were never intended for prevention, they define actions that will be punished. *NM*
- 23/12/2012 12:57:57 PM
595 Views
So do laws against getting a gun without screening, training and certification.
- 23/12/2012 02:01:32 PM
884 Views
Then CHANGE the Constitution, don't ignore it. *NM*
- 26/12/2012 03:12:11 PM
513 Views
I am not suggesting either changing or ignoring the Constitution.
- 26/12/2012 04:01:02 PM
993 Views
Yes you are.
- 26/12/2012 08:06:01 PM
805 Views
Learn logic, and stop needlessly trying to teach me grammar.
- 26/12/2012 08:55:25 PM
959 Views
Lear to read, and I won't have to
- 27/12/2012 04:28:59 PM
1006 Views
Ironically, you misspelled "learn."
- 28/12/2012 05:15:17 PM
1242 Views
- 28/12/2012 05:15:17 PM
1242 Views
I know, I thought about going back and fixing the typo, but thought it was funny so I left it. 
*NM*
- 28/12/2012 10:34:06 PM
553 Views
*NM*
- 28/12/2012 10:34:06 PM
553 Views
2 commas or 4 makes no difference one is a 12D the other is a sentance.
- 28/12/2012 10:55:31 PM
891 Views
It makes a huge difference when (incorrectly) claiming to know the text.
- 28/12/2012 11:31:51 PM
1197 Views
and by REGULATED, the authors meeant "able to use it effectively"
- 29/12/2012 03:47:57 PM
957 Views
You are wrong.
- 22/12/2012 12:14:40 PM
963 Views
That explains much; I read somewhere Brits are averse to it.
- 22/12/2012 01:17:15 PM
903 Views
What bemuses me about this thing with Adam Lanza, is that his mother had 5 registered guns
- 23/12/2012 07:10:26 AM
963 Views
She also had many knives, and blunt objecs around the house. Tools are only as good as the user
- 23/12/2012 01:10:58 PM
969 Views
So clearly she wasn't prepared enough... btw, do we know she was sleeping?
- 27/12/2012 10:52:03 AM
900 Views
That she 1) was in bed, 2) had guns for self-defense and 3) was shot 4 times strongly suggests sleep
- 28/12/2012 11:49:20 PM
999 Views
She was asleep with him in the house.
- 23/12/2012 02:24:47 PM
976 Views
LOOK, look, there is another one...
- 26/12/2012 03:13:45 PM
895 Views
I find the absolutist ant/pro-gun positions equally dangerous and absurd.
- 26/12/2012 04:20:37 PM
893 Views
So we should just *kinda* ignore the Constitution *this* time... But what about NEXT time...
- 26/12/2012 08:08:12 PM
866 Views
No, we should enact gun regulation the Constitution explicitly empowers.
- 26/12/2012 09:02:12 PM
874 Views
Which would be... NONE. *NM*
- 27/12/2012 04:31:53 PM
555 Views
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state...."
- 28/12/2012 05:14:49 PM
869 Views
Your point being?
- 27/12/2012 10:47:29 AM
856 Views
I am certain it would have been better, though not good, if she had been awake and shot him.
- 27/12/2012 02:16:13 PM
973 Views
So the situation of Nancy and Adam shooting at each other
- 28/12/2012 07:44:12 AM
980 Views
No, I believe they were both mentally incompetent to have guns; that does not mean EVERYONE is.
- 28/12/2012 02:19:51 PM
907 Views
As a father, I would rather kill my own child than have him kill 26 other people.
- 27/12/2012 04:35:02 PM
813 Views
And as a father, you are somehow clairvoyant?
- 28/12/2012 07:43:08 AM
874 Views
Nice flippant unthinking reply, you and moondog should get together. *NM*
- 28/12/2012 04:55:14 PM
569 Views
How is my reply flippant? Your statement was unthinking, not mine.
- 29/12/2012 06:59:04 AM
902 Views
YOU asked if it would have been better for her to kill her own child instead, I answered.
- 29/12/2012 03:52:02 PM
935 Views
I asked if a shoot out between mother and son had been better, not whether she should have killed
- 29/12/2012 08:54:09 PM
859 Views
You make no sense.
- 31/12/2012 06:07:50 PM
940 Views
I make no sense to you because you probably just don't understand my point.
- 01/01/2013 08:09:11 AM
1007 Views
Maybe the heat death of the univers occurs before you finally have a cohearant thought
- 01/01/2013 07:34:31 PM
923 Views
You do realize that resorting to personal attacks reveal an inability to make sound arguments? *NM*
- 02/01/2013 06:01:33 PM
630 Views
That is not an ad hominem attack, and your prior post was not very logically coherent
- 02/01/2013 08:59:16 PM
1001 Views
Instead of actually showing why my arguments would be incoherent or why I'm immature, he just said
- 05/01/2013 02:02:23 AM
1003 Views