Active Users:1123 Time:22/11/2024 09:25:24 AM
The difference between allowing someone to defend themselves with a gun they have TheCrownless Send a noteboard - 22/12/2012 01:09:40 AM
I'd like to see someone present a citation that in that country it isn't, which is frankly utterly irrelevant but still, right now it is just an assertion. I have shown, and will be glad to quote, that under their laws it's entirely allowed to use own in self-defense... which would seem more important.


for a legitimate reason and allowing people to buy guns for the purpose of self defence are very different things. If you really disagree with that then I honestly do not know what to say.
Come to the dark side, We have candy!

I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
Reply to message
When guns are a big national issue, how do reporters & pundits not know facts about them? - 21/12/2012 05:33:14 PM 1538 Views
You don't hunt by walking into a classroom and shooting 20 deer - 21/12/2012 05:56:16 PM 991 Views
You're actually not right on that one - 21/12/2012 07:49:53 PM 919 Views
That wasn't the point I was making - 21/12/2012 09:49:40 PM 865 Views
You should probably clarify it then - 21/12/2012 10:47:26 PM 1021 Views
His post was perfectly clear. Yours seemed like a response to an entirely different post. - 21/12/2012 10:53:39 PM 1176 Views
Explain that remark, it is not obvious to me *NM* - 21/12/2012 11:00:10 PM 529 Views
I think - 21/12/2012 11:13:34 PM 851 Views
Thats' easy, there is simply no such thing as a 'hunting rifle' - 21/12/2012 11:17:41 PM 860 Views
I'd say the expert gunsmith - 21/12/2012 11:28:02 PM 905 Views
I thought I was being perfectly clear. - 21/12/2012 10:57:35 PM 870 Views
Re: I thought I was being perfectly clear. - 21/12/2012 11:25:04 PM 921 Views
Oh I wasn't commenting on the standard of people here - 21/12/2012 11:29:36 PM 841 Views
you're largely correct, which is why we need stronger laws on ownership not guns per se - 21/12/2012 09:39:14 PM 830 Views
I can't think of a better reason than self defense - 21/12/2012 10:33:26 PM 889 Views
He is right about Australia - 21/12/2012 10:46:27 PM 868 Views
No kidding - 21/12/2012 10:59:28 PM 854 Views
If you knew all that - 21/12/2012 11:02:38 PM 879 Views
Because I used wiki of course - 21/12/2012 11:21:25 PM 927 Views
He said ""self defense" is not a valid excuse to own a lethal weapon" - 21/12/2012 11:34:59 PM 801 Views
Yes,which is un-cited, but I did prove it's a valid excuse to use one, so... - 22/12/2012 12:36:19 AM 928 Views
The difference between allowing someone to defend themselves with a gun they have - 22/12/2012 01:09:40 AM 843 Views
I think you are on the right track, but to the wrong destination; "lethal weapon" is redundant. - 21/12/2012 11:05:29 PM 862 Views
My read is that the 2nd Amendment not only allows, but mandates, cop-killer bullets. - 22/12/2012 12:45:04 AM 902 Views
Does the Second Amendment protect the rights of felons and the mentally incompetent to have guns? - 22/12/2012 02:35:16 AM 1067 Views
Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands. - 22/12/2012 03:02:18 AM 794 Views
Re: Yes the media is using terms incorrectly but the point still stands. - 22/12/2012 04:12:30 AM 852 Views
umm... - 22/12/2012 12:41:31 PM 767 Views
1997 North Hollywood Shootout - 22/12/2012 04:07:39 AM 930 Views
Laws against murder failed to prevent that, too; clearly they are ineffective and should be repealed - 22/12/2012 06:02:24 AM 985 Views
Such laws were never intended for prevention, they define actions that will be punished. *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:57:57 PM 560 Views
So do laws against getting a gun without screening, training and certification. - 23/12/2012 02:01:32 PM 806 Views
Then CHANGE the Constitution, don't ignore it. *NM* - 26/12/2012 03:12:11 PM 494 Views
I am not suggesting either changing or ignoring the Constitution. - 26/12/2012 04:01:02 PM 913 Views
Yes you are. - 26/12/2012 08:06:01 PM 714 Views
Learn logic, and stop needlessly trying to teach me grammar. - 26/12/2012 08:55:25 PM 877 Views
Lear to read, and I won't have to - 27/12/2012 04:28:59 PM 940 Views
You are wrong. - 22/12/2012 12:14:40 PM 889 Views
That explains much; I read somewhere Brits are averse to it. - 22/12/2012 01:17:15 PM 812 Views
We're also averse to being wrong. - 22/12/2012 02:53:49 PM 891 Views
So you say... - 22/12/2012 03:32:16 PM 811 Views
guns r stpid *NM* - 23/12/2012 12:39:30 AM 581 Views
What bemuses me about this thing with Adam Lanza, is that his mother had 5 registered guns - 23/12/2012 07:10:26 AM 908 Views
She was asleep with him in the house. - 23/12/2012 02:24:47 PM 881 Views
LOOK, look, there is another one... - 26/12/2012 03:13:45 PM 820 Views
I find the absolutist ant/pro-gun positions equally dangerous and absurd. - 26/12/2012 04:20:37 PM 795 Views
So we should just *kinda* ignore the Constitution *this* time... But what about NEXT time... - 26/12/2012 08:08:12 PM 782 Views
No, we should enact gun regulation the Constitution explicitly empowers. - 26/12/2012 09:02:12 PM 796 Views
Which would be... NONE. *NM* - 27/12/2012 04:31:53 PM 499 Views
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state...." - 28/12/2012 05:14:49 PM 789 Views
*see previous grammar lesson* *NM* - 28/12/2012 10:31:43 PM 483 Views
The instant it becomes relevant, I shall. - 28/12/2012 11:45:01 PM 984 Views
Your point being? - 27/12/2012 10:47:29 AM 779 Views
Facts are irrelevant when FUD is the order of the day. - 24/12/2012 04:34:18 PM 786 Views
It irritates me too. *NM* - 01/01/2013 01:55:05 PM 503 Views

Reply to Message