Despite our words, our actions dictate wanting an end to any semblance of peace, security, safety and health of our nation. Allowing people to carry concealed firearms is outright inviting firearm misuse. It has been clear the last decade that our country is slipping away from being able to call itself civilized but laws like these really hammer the reality home.
I personally am for strict gun laws. I think handguns should be banned from all but law enforcement and military. They serve as nothing but human slayers. Someone outside of those capacities simply doesn't need one. Protection? Get a shot gun or rifle. Those serve a dual purpose, you can hunt. But, I am also not so delusional as most Americans and I fully understand that I could perhaps be wrong. Though I can argue against handguns all day long. What I can not understand is how concealing a firearm is in anyway safe or ideal?
Let me take another scenario of a similar situation/issue. The acceptable practice (and laws essentially uphold this at this point) is that you can't do anything to physically stop shoplifters. You have to have without a doubt evidence to even convict them at this point and if you touch them or anything you're in general open to lawsuits and so on and so forth. So the acceptable practice is annoying the fuck out of potential shoplifters. Offer good service. Talk to them. And if you're positive but have no proof, essentially watch them and make it none. In short, do everything you can to DETER them from stealing. Don't sneak around and watch them then hope to catch them AFTER something happens. Keep it from happening.
My point in illustrating this is concealing the weapon does nothing but foster fear of one's fellow citizens instead of DETERRING violence. The only way it DETERS violence is in everyone fearing that everyone else has a firearm they can't see. That is/would be/will be a dangerous and frightening society to live in. If you were allowed to carry but did so openly it would be far more effective in DETERRING violence. I realize even in this argument there are conundrums that can negate the logic but there are conundrums in every side or argument associated with gun laws. For me, I personally would like to think that we as a nation and society have become civilized enough that we don't have to fear our fellow citizens, that at the end of the day we are intelligent enough (and we currently are far, far from it in this short bus riding nation) to see that concealing firearms only fosters fear in our fellow citizens.
P.S.- I left out things about our constitutional rights, so I'll address my thought on that. Concealing weapons a. isn't part of it b. handguns serve no purpose for it. If anyone truly thinks that having handguns and concealing handguns in this day and age (with the weapons and capabilities our military has) protects you against your own country then you're as delusional as someone thinking that if a squirrel fucks a salmon they'd make a baby turducken.
I personally am for strict gun laws. I think handguns should be banned from all but law enforcement and military. They serve as nothing but human slayers. Someone outside of those capacities simply doesn't need one. Protection? Get a shot gun or rifle. Those serve a dual purpose, you can hunt. But, I am also not so delusional as most Americans and I fully understand that I could perhaps be wrong. Though I can argue against handguns all day long. What I can not understand is how concealing a firearm is in anyway safe or ideal?
Let me take another scenario of a similar situation/issue. The acceptable practice (and laws essentially uphold this at this point) is that you can't do anything to physically stop shoplifters. You have to have without a doubt evidence to even convict them at this point and if you touch them or anything you're in general open to lawsuits and so on and so forth. So the acceptable practice is annoying the fuck out of potential shoplifters. Offer good service. Talk to them. And if you're positive but have no proof, essentially watch them and make it none. In short, do everything you can to DETER them from stealing. Don't sneak around and watch them then hope to catch them AFTER something happens. Keep it from happening.
My point in illustrating this is concealing the weapon does nothing but foster fear of one's fellow citizens instead of DETERRING violence. The only way it DETERS violence is in everyone fearing that everyone else has a firearm they can't see. That is/would be/will be a dangerous and frightening society to live in. If you were allowed to carry but did so openly it would be far more effective in DETERRING violence. I realize even in this argument there are conundrums that can negate the logic but there are conundrums in every side or argument associated with gun laws. For me, I personally would like to think that we as a nation and society have become civilized enough that we don't have to fear our fellow citizens, that at the end of the day we are intelligent enough (and we currently are far, far from it in this short bus riding nation) to see that concealing firearms only fosters fear in our fellow citizens.
P.S.- I left out things about our constitutional rights, so I'll address my thought on that. Concealing weapons a. isn't part of it b. handguns serve no purpose for it. If anyone truly thinks that having handguns and concealing handguns in this day and age (with the weapons and capabilities our military has) protects you against your own country then you're as delusional as someone thinking that if a squirrel fucks a salmon they'd make a baby turducken.
But all of that was spot-on and true. I'm always glad to see the occasional American actually noticing how messed up their weapon situation is, especially when it comes to what kind of civilized society we want to live in.
*MySmiley*
You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling.
Just a reminder everyone
20/12/2012 02:28:25 AM
- 652 Views
Didn't know that, glad to hear it
20/12/2012 03:16:26 AM
- 499 Views
You see in my case it wouldn't be murder though
20/12/2012 03:24:31 AM
- 555 Views
Well, if I absorb your meaning that parallels what I call 'Expedited Divorce Proceedings'
20/12/2012 06:00:11 AM
- 396 Views
I prefer to call them "Non-parental, Post-100th Trimester Abortions." *NM*
21/12/2012 06:44:06 AM
- 224 Views
Re: I prefer to call them "Non-parental, Post-100th Trimester Abortions."
21/12/2012 11:27:43 PM
- 398 Views
People wouldn't have known any of that anyways
20/12/2012 05:25:26 AM
- 616 Views
Re: People wouldn't have known any of that anyways
21/12/2012 01:20:12 PM
- 565 Views
Re: People wouldn't have known any of that anyways
21/12/2012 05:43:57 PM
- 399 Views
Re: People wouldn't have known any of that anyways
21/12/2012 09:15:49 PM
- 544 Views
But I've read your other posts and there is dissonance in them
21/12/2012 10:21:15 PM
- 521 Views
Re: But I've read your other posts and there is dissonance in them
24/12/2012 04:13:59 AM
- 551 Views
I always respect someone who admits to being philosophically inconsistent
24/12/2012 04:35:02 AM
- 663 Views
The gun law situation here in the U.S. is an outright joke.
21/12/2012 01:15:50 PM
- 546 Views
We may not ever agree on films...
21/12/2012 11:37:01 PM
- 592 Views
sorry you're having a bad day but you sound like *exactly* the person who should be barred from guns
21/12/2012 02:52:36 PM
- 431 Views
Wikipedia says it is not legal in DC, and IL must write a law dealing with it.
22/12/2012 12:13:45 AM
- 547 Views