Active Users:1211 Time:22/11/2024 08:33:44 PM
Florida state law does not and did not prohibit statewide recounts. Joel Send a noteboard - 16/12/2012 01:45:52 PM
SCOTUS ruled that Florida had to follow their own laws, that existed at the time of the election, not change them on the fly.

It only required that the results be certified by a specific date, and the SCOTUS stepped in to declare no recount could be completed by that date. Scalias vote with the majority asserting he and his fellows are clairvoyant and precognitive does not exactly support his supposed belief in limited SCOTUS power.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
SCOTUS Justice Antonin Scalia is brilliant, just brilliant - - 11/12/2012 05:09:19 AM 985 Views
WTF does "I don’t care what their intent was. I care what it was that they intended" mean? - 11/12/2012 09:03:23 PM 552 Views
Yeah I read that twice to see if that was right *NM* - 11/12/2012 09:36:55 PM 268 Views
Part of me pities Scalias decline, because he could once nimbly and convincly argue black is white. - 12/12/2012 07:09:56 PM 525 Views
Re: your post. - 12/12/2012 07:18:18 PM 499 Views
You are quite right; I never noticed that until now. - 12/12/2012 07:29:08 PM 600 Views
Not quite - 12/12/2012 08:16:27 PM 616 Views
Poes Law. - 16/12/2012 01:42:55 PM 522 Views
More like disapeared in a puff of Florida's own law that they were trying to ignore. - 12/12/2012 08:13:13 PM 518 Views
actually..... - 12/12/2012 08:32:58 PM 602 Views
Re: actually..... - 12/12/2012 09:39:01 PM 508 Views
Florida state law does not and did not prohibit statewide recounts. - 16/12/2012 01:45:52 PM 519 Views
Your whole rant lacks any logic - 12/12/2012 03:46:34 PM 559 Views
+1 - logic is not his strong suit. *NM* - 12/12/2012 04:21:09 PM 221 Views
His comment references the authors (NOT words) intent in both negative and affirmative. - 12/12/2012 06:45:02 PM 517 Views
Rebuttal - 12/12/2012 07:58:41 PM 556 Views
Only nominally. - 16/12/2012 03:54:38 PM 516 Views
I was stumped by his phrasing as well - 12/12/2012 09:31:53 PM 423 Views
The SCotUS is no place for raging homophobes. - 13/12/2012 04:48:30 AM 654 Views
Sorry you don't like it, but what he said is true. - 13/12/2012 03:11:42 PM 573 Views
Lol. Homophobia is synonymous w/ homonegativism. It's not meant to convey a true phobia *NM* - 13/12/2012 03:28:01 PM 332 Views
So then what we need is a definition of homophobia? - 13/12/2012 09:56:15 PM 599 Views
Re: So then what we need is a definition of homophobia? - 13/12/2012 11:16:46 PM 545 Views
-phobe : Greek -phobos, adj. derivative of phóbos fear, panic - 13/12/2012 11:32:14 PM 561 Views
Do you have a similar problem with "xenophobia?" Because it's exactly the same thing. - 14/12/2012 01:30:24 AM 486 Views
xenophobia is the fear of the alien... WTF are you trying to say? - 14/12/2012 03:03:09 AM 549 Views
No. You are patently, objectively incorrect. - 14/12/2012 08:39:00 AM 478 Views
An aside. - 14/12/2012 01:21:32 PM 556 Views
Don't believe me, ask a Greek it is after all THEIR word. I gave you some extra capitals, happy now? *NM* - 14/12/2012 02:56:09 PM 335 Views
stop being obtuse - 14/12/2012 05:10:41 PM 531 Views
Hmmmm lets see, people misuse a word, perverting its meaning... - 14/12/2012 07:29:11 PM 496 Views
Double post. *NM* - 14/12/2012 10:14:50 PM 237 Views
that's glory for you! - 14/12/2012 10:44:30 PM 564 Views
So very conflicted, in so many ways.... - 16/12/2012 04:14:08 PM 657 Views

Reply to Message