Active Users:1119 Time:14/11/2024 06:18:19 AM
There are some statements, yes - Edit 1

Before modification by Avendesora at 30/09/2009 05:03:37 PM

but do we have any reason to believe it is true.


That he didn't know her actual age? Angelica Huston made a statement on it and she was present that night. It's also a pretty standard defense in cases like this.

We do know for a fact that he is a fugutive from justice who skipped out on his bail. That alone is a good enough reason to bring him back.


After 30 years? Why? To prove a point?

And what point would that be? That someone who has posed no threat to anyone (as evidenced by many many years of living a very stand up life since all this) needs to be dragged through the mud because some now dead judge decided to welch on an agreement and send him running scared?

I dunno- all that cost for that? Seems like a ridiculous waste to me.

Return to message