Active Users:744 Time:24/12/2024 12:50:48 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Oh. I must've missed that. Legolas Send a noteboard - 07/11/2012 10:03:28 PM
She's off - I think it was announced a while ago but got buried under the election stuff. Three years to carefully get ready for her bid for the White House (I'd imagine being Secretary of State would be a hindrance when trying to find the time to campaign in the primaries then election?)

But as you note, it might not be a bad thing... yeah, would be essentially impossible to campaign while being Secretary of State. Which is making me wonder what it says about the office of President that that one CAN be combined with campaigning... :P
Reply to message
My own thoughts on the election results Tom - 07/11/2012 06:12:26 PM 1173 Views
I feel bad nossy - 07/11/2012 06:51:03 PM 761 Views
Well said. The Shrike - 07/11/2012 06:56:36 PM 862 Views
Romney might have been a good president TheCrownless - 07/11/2012 07:10:14 PM 780 Views
it's hard to say romney would have been better when he took every side of every issue moondog - 07/11/2012 07:10:25 PM 805 Views
Do you think Republicans got the message, or will it take one more unnecessary defeat? *NM* Burr - 07/11/2012 07:11:50 PM 337 Views
Good points all. Somehow I don't really think they'll take them to heart any time soon, though... Legolas - 07/11/2012 08:00:56 PM 825 Views
Re: Hillary. Nate - 07/11/2012 08:13:25 PM 726 Views
A lot of people seem to think she will. Legolas - 07/11/2012 08:26:57 PM 800 Views
Biden hinted he was thinking about running. But he looks older, so that might benefit her. Burr - 07/11/2012 09:18:49 PM 753 Views
I maintain that Mark Warner will get the nod next time around Jragghen - 07/11/2012 09:57:21 PM 709 Views
Um snoopcester - 07/11/2012 09:50:08 PM 736 Views
Oh. I must've missed that. Legolas - 07/11/2012 10:03:28 PM 723 Views
Well there has been a slightly more important US politics story for the media to cover of late snoopcester - 07/11/2012 10:18:28 PM 743 Views
Snowe? Seriously? Chris Christie is far more likely. Tom - 07/11/2012 09:52:25 PM 727 Views
Chris Christie *was* far more likely. I expect his party to eat him alive after Sandy. Jragghen - 07/11/2012 09:59:17 PM 893 Views
Yes, but Christie gained the respect of a lot of moderates for that. Ghavrel - 07/11/2012 10:20:08 PM 732 Views
Moderates don't vote in the primaries *NM* Jragghen - 07/11/2012 10:21:50 PM 405 Views
Enough of them vote to ensure a Christie victory in a GOP primary. Ghavrel - 08/11/2012 05:09:24 AM 707 Views
It should help him snoopcester - 07/11/2012 10:22:34 PM 678 Views
I doubt it. Tom - 08/11/2012 03:20:54 PM 710 Views
did you see jon stewart's take on the rove meltdown? moondog - 08/11/2012 05:51:53 PM 728 Views
Re: I doubt it. TaskmasterJack - 09/11/2012 03:22:23 AM 767 Views
Has been seen as not entirely Republican for quite a while, I think. Legolas - 07/11/2012 10:08:15 PM 719 Views
Re: Hillary. unstuckman - 08/11/2012 02:46:57 AM 1165 Views
Dems went through this a generation ago when Reagan branded extremists and made "liberal" a slur Joel - 11/11/2012 06:10:00 PM 927 Views
Very interesting post, Tom. Macharius - 08/11/2012 06:13:24 PM 827 Views
It will be interesting whether the GOPs financiers convince its primary voters you are right. Joel - 11/11/2012 05:07:43 PM 859 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes