Active Users:1125 Time:22/11/2024 03:05:29 PM
amazing imlad Send a noteboard - 28/10/2012 05:04:21 AM
Not to say there isn't some interesting discussion on this thread, but I do find it amazing that this thread seems to be mostly men discussing decisions about a woman's body.

That's what started this whole damned mess, ESPECIALLY since all of those texts were not only written by men, but by men with no concept of science or biology, and the fact that they were men who typically did not think of women as being anywhere near their equals.

Even if divinely inspired, God's message still has to flow through the mind and body of those men before it reaches the paper leaving it open to corruption by the mind of the vessel, and that alone makes anything they wrote dealing with women suspect in my mind.

I do credit you guys on your knowledge of the texts (and all that Greek!), but my personal belief is that with the "written word of God" shit gets lost or changed in translation, and I'm not talking human languages; I'm talking about how God's message is translated from inspiration to text on the page.

So what a bunch of men 2000 years ago claim some specifically MALE deity says about women and birth and all that is meaningless in a society that should have evolved out of the Dark Ages created by those same patriarch's disdain of rational thought and humanism, which led to said Dark Ages.
Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
Reply to message
God Distances Self From Christian Right - 26/10/2012 01:56:18 PM 1218 Views
Do you really think God would condone abortion? *NM* - 26/10/2012 03:28:25 PM 356 Views
Depends on when a fetus is a being, which the GOP contends is "at the moment of fertilization." - 26/10/2012 03:57:44 PM 549 Views
Actually, I don't see any place in the Bible where God is.... - 26/10/2012 04:00:19 PM 722 Views
Where did I say one word about God accommodating our sin? - 26/10/2012 05:55:52 PM 584 Views
You're technically right, Joel, but... - 26/10/2012 07:32:10 PM 592 Views
Almost may count in hand grenades, but definitely not in canon. - 26/10/2012 10:28:57 PM 632 Views
That's a dangerous stance to take as a Christian - 27/10/2012 01:11:14 AM 567 Views
I agree it is good reading; that does not make it binding. - 27/10/2012 01:37:20 AM 582 Views
Jesus that Greek sounds weird to my ears. - 27/10/2012 03:43:40 AM 678 Views
It's really just simplified Attic. - 27/10/2012 06:11:48 AM 563 Views
Condemn women to die? What a strange way to look at this. - 26/10/2012 07:17:16 PM 636 Views
women *did* die before abortion was legalized, there should be no dispute of this aspect - 26/10/2012 07:27:28 PM 641 Views
Very good point, but that was not (at least soley) what I meant, no. - 26/10/2012 11:12:32 PM 561 Views
If something should be illegal in its own right, it is nonsense to legalize it because criminals - 26/10/2012 11:40:41 PM 585 Views
If banning it saves no lives but inevitably takes more, the ban is counterproductive. - 27/10/2012 12:48:51 AM 609 Views
That is absolutely absurd. It saves the lives of all... - 27/10/2012 12:59:16 AM 624 Views
you're still missing the point that abortions will still be performed if it were illegal - 27/10/2012 01:02:57 AM 526 Views
I'm not missing the point, you are. - 27/10/2012 01:21:39 AM 684 Views
People who want abortions badly enough to have one will, whether or not law makes it "convenient." - 27/10/2012 02:58:52 AM 527 Views
You're stuck. - 27/10/2012 07:07:36 AM 648 Views
not entirely - 27/10/2012 03:23:07 PM 650 Views
Give me facts, not supposition. - 27/10/2012 04:10:57 PM 595 Views
Perfect example of media sensationalism - 26/10/2012 04:13:41 PM 628 Views
I agree with your larger point and am not trying to be argumentative - 26/10/2012 04:29:23 PM 603 Views
THAT is the whole problem with his comment. - 26/10/2012 05:59:40 PM 527 Views
Or it could mean.... - 26/10/2012 11:50:53 PM 583 Views
Re: Or it could mean.... - 27/10/2012 12:14:31 AM 564 Views
I agree - 26/10/2012 07:27:21 PM 618 Views
It's always a slippery slope, talking about what God did and did not intend. - 27/10/2012 12:06:22 AM 583 Views
Yes - 27/10/2012 02:20:46 AM 602 Views
I suppose it is splitting hairs. - 27/10/2012 04:32:43 PM 569 Views
Pregnancy cannot be separated from its cause. - 26/10/2012 05:51:28 PM 574 Views
Re: Pregnancy cannot be separated from its cause. - 27/10/2012 01:17:04 AM 574 Views
Who said anything about denying them funds? - 27/10/2012 01:54:39 AM 600 Views
God intends everything. - 27/10/2012 04:40:58 PM 659 Views
"Intends" is a big word. - 27/10/2012 09:23:13 PM 604 Views
Re: "Intends" is a big word. - 29/10/2012 04:56:49 PM 547 Views
I am familiar with the Problem of Evil. - 29/10/2012 06:41:13 PM 558 Views
Absolutely agree. *NM* - 26/10/2012 11:47:04 PM 310 Views
It is sad that this is getting more press than the Bengazi scandal *NM* - 26/10/2012 05:58:22 PM 312 Views
It is sad partisanship trumps policy for so many. - 26/10/2012 10:52:34 PM 506 Views
The comment that sparked this was moronic even to the vast majority of religious conservatives. *NM* - 26/10/2012 09:42:51 PM 331 Views
Yet its author remains the only Senate nominee for whom Romney is running ads. - 26/10/2012 10:53:37 PM 547 Views
Is the senator's comment more disgusting to you than the President's vote against the - 26/10/2012 11:54:55 PM 557 Views
how does one vote against a bill which passed by unanimous consent? - 27/10/2012 12:11:37 AM 560 Views
As a state senator in 2001 in illinois he was the sole opponent to the aforementioned bill. *NM* - 27/10/2012 12:14:08 AM 329 Views
[citation needed] - 27/10/2012 12:15:41 AM 512 Views
It was an illinois state bill. *NM* - 27/10/2012 12:23:12 AM 315 Views
yes, i finally found *something* regarding a state bill which he did oppose - 27/10/2012 12:34:40 AM 552 Views
It is not hard to find, really. - 27/10/2012 02:40:06 AM 520 Views
Links: - 27/10/2012 12:51:12 AM 579 Views
Double post. *NM* - 27/10/2012 12:18:42 AM 310 Views
amazing - 28/10/2012 05:04:21 AM 664 Views

Reply to Message