There is a big middle ground on social issues, and almost none on social programs.
Joel Send a noteboard - 26/10/2012 11:23:00 PM
Gary Johnson will probably pull more vote than the others combined, and he already had multiple debates to prove his worth, other than a truly excellent one-liner about dogs and job growth he doesn't have much to field.
As for their debating skills, I didn't hear quite the pauses and stutters that I heard in the televised debates *shrugs*
Low tension format? Seriously thought what would these people have to debate? I'm nominally libertarian so I'm sympathetic to that POV but I can't imagine what a Libertarian would have to say to a Green or what the point is of a debate between them watched by audiences that are principally one or the other, there's effectively no middle ground for a swing
A lot of common foreign policy ground, too. I would much prefer a Green vs. Libertarian election, even though the latter would probably stomp the former.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
And now, the third parties have had their own debate (link provided)
- 24/10/2012 04:43:54 AM
641 Views
Frankly the B-team doesn't debate well
- 24/10/2012 05:32:12 AM
402 Views
And yet issues that concern me were discussed here and not in the Obama/Romney/Biden/Ryan debates
- 24/10/2012 05:35:29 AM
410 Views
Well, if it works for you
- 24/10/2012 06:56:15 AM
336 Views
There is a big middle ground on social issues, and almost none on social programs.
- 26/10/2012 11:23:00 PM
382 Views
I thought they needed better organizers, and a better questioner than that lady. *NM*
- 24/10/2012 07:46:40 AM
346 Views
They should have this group debate as a team vs. Obama/Romney/Biden/Ryan
- 27/10/2012 01:29:16 AM
331 Views