If a doctor with a turkey baster or a needle injected eggs into a women's womb without her consent he couldn't be charged with rape only bodily assault?
I am inclined to agree with your rationale though. I am no lawyer, of course, but understand rapes legal definition to include sex. I also believe it (and bodily assault) is a crime of violence. If you managed to impregnate a woman as the Father did—with NO physical contact (sexual or otherwise)—I believe you would be off the hook. Getting that pound of fetal flesh without spilling a drop of virgin maternal blood, however, is rather difficult by mortal means.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
every time a republican candidate mentions rape, i think of the following video
25/10/2012 05:58:16 PM
- 822 Views
that's hilarious and evokes a "what the shit?" much like all those gop jackasses.
25/10/2012 08:03:24 PM
- 497 Views
The sole difference between Western and Mideast fundamentalists is the god blamed for intolerance
26/10/2012 01:29:54 AM
- 480 Views
I am SO GOING to get flamed for asking this
25/10/2012 08:45:21 PM
- 507 Views

No, because God did not have sex with Mary.
25/10/2012 09:23:12 PM
- 618 Views
Following that logic
25/10/2012 09:25:11 PM
- 502 Views
Think of it in terms of The Merchant of Venice.
25/10/2012 10:28:42 PM
- 478 Views
Closer than Roland, but still off.
25/10/2012 09:51:12 PM
- 501 Views
However parsed, since Marys supposed sinlessness is through Christs conception, it is retroactive
25/10/2012 10:10:48 PM
- 485 Views
The point I am horrible job making is this
25/10/2012 10:12:53 PM
- 509 Views
The biblical narrative states an act of CONCEPTION without an act of SEX.
25/10/2012 10:37:48 PM
- 471 Views
New GOP Congressmen daily refute the GOPs pretended support of rape exceptions to abortion bans.
25/10/2012 10:07:21 PM
- 728 Views
This is not a source I generally resort to, but let me quote John Cornyn:
25/10/2012 11:11:04 PM
- 484 Views
I think he is an idiot for saying it
25/10/2012 11:53:01 PM
- 498 Views
Calling y Gods will calls x Gods will, because y depends on x.
26/10/2012 12:14:27 AM
- 597 Views
I'm really not going to debate theodicy with you, especially since I'm not even a believer.
26/10/2012 12:24:57 AM
- 486 Views
Choice forms a critical distinction there; small wonder Cornyn and Mourdock missed it.
26/10/2012 12:48:18 AM
- 553 Views