Active Users:1117 Time:23/11/2024 12:49:14 AM
As long as it is equitable imlad Send a noteboard - 20/10/2012 05:55:57 PM
I have no issue with men and women each having multiple husbands and wives, as long as all partners are adults and willing participants.

This means that if a woman wants multiple husbands (OR wives) and the other partners are fine with that, then I'm okay with it.

Like the Willow family on Caprica. That is a fine situation by me. A household of several men and women, all married to each other, all working together to raise all the children. How is that bad?

Where polygamy runs into problems is when it is only the men who can have multiple spouses, and those spouses aren't always adults when they marry, and don't always have a say in the marriage. THAT I will object to.

Of course, I would object to a system where only the women could have multiple spouses as well.

Like I said, if it is equitable, then it is fine by me.

Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
Reply to message
For all you supporters of Gay Marriage: What about polygamy? - 20/10/2012 12:02:06 AM 1368 Views
Legal rights. - 20/10/2012 12:14:10 AM 776 Views
It almost sounds like you are saying... - 20/10/2012 12:31:40 AM 745 Views
That is what I'm saying it. - 20/10/2012 01:07:50 AM 727 Views
Technically, privileges, not rights. - 20/10/2012 04:16:45 AM 731 Views
Sure - 20/10/2012 12:35:53 AM 658 Views
All for it... For adults over the age of 18. *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:18:04 AM 390 Views
What about it? - 20/10/2012 01:21:17 AM 735 Views
+1 *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:51:25 AM 424 Views
+2 *NM* - 20/10/2012 11:18:39 AM 375 Views
should be legal, would be nice for poly people. should include polygyny and polyandry. *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:29:05 AM 376 Views
poly people? - 20/10/2012 12:44:01 PM 701 Views
Government needs to stop legislating morality. So yes *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:36:37 AM 368 Views
That's a huge chunk of what government does. - 20/10/2012 04:35:45 PM 705 Views
That's not what I'm saying - 21/10/2012 03:21:08 AM 721 Views
So you're opposed to abortion and gun control then? Welcome aboard! - 21/10/2012 06:14:14 AM 670 Views
Why do you keep talking about gay marriage and polygamy in the same sentence.. - 20/10/2012 03:58:26 AM 747 Views
Get a grip. Your response is just what I tried to avoid. - 20/10/2012 04:33:40 AM 666 Views
The more fool you. - 21/10/2012 05:55:30 AM 759 Views
Ha! Point. *NM* - 20/10/2012 05:40:34 AM 566 Views
Marriage is always a choice, whatever the motive(s.) - 22/10/2012 04:00:40 PM 691 Views
I got no opinion on it. - 20/10/2012 12:51:43 PM 788 Views
The idea of a group marriage makes me uncomfortable - 20/10/2012 04:19:48 PM 669 Views
As long as it is equitable - 20/10/2012 05:55:57 PM 662 Views
The state shouldn't even recognize marriage beyond name changes anyway - 21/10/2012 03:52:40 AM 733 Views
Indeed - 21/10/2012 06:04:41 AM 791 Views
I don't give a damn what you call it. That's your business. - 21/10/2012 06:17:40 AM 1066 Views
And so? - 21/10/2012 07:05:08 AM 698 Views
Re: And so? - 21/10/2012 04:10:19 PM 864 Views
Legal contracts must be open to all consenting adults, or none. - 22/10/2012 03:11:55 PM 745 Views
You are correct, yet your reasoning is flawed. - 23/10/2012 03:20:25 PM 671 Views
Again, the Equal Protection Clause has far less force on private entities than on government. - 23/10/2012 03:52:06 PM 604 Views
Much less force, yes. - 23/10/2012 04:15:03 PM 613 Views
The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business." - 23/10/2012 04:43:25 PM 685 Views
+1 *NM* - 23/10/2012 07:36:46 PM 309 Views
No the analogy is not exact, nor legally the same... - 23/10/2012 07:33:25 PM 579 Views
Analogy is not equality, only similarity. - 24/10/2012 04:37:29 PM 778 Views
We aren't asking for something better or different. - 23/10/2012 04:27:04 PM 673 Views
yeah, it is very circular. - 23/10/2012 07:44:33 PM 704 Views

Reply to Message